Ummm don't trust much in AMD marketing slides. AMD draw less only because the all core setup is unable to run at high clock, they barely can go a little over 4Ghz all core. Intel all core setup can go near 5Ghz for a short period (or longer if cooling setup allow this).. So at he end there is not this high peformance watt advantage they are saying, expecially because they are stuck to CB and do not show others benches to support their numbers. Bet on other workloads Intel is better than AMD in efficence. The long story of benches......
If you can handle the heat Intel CPU can run very high my i9 7900x is running at 4.8ghz all coees albeit quite hot under load but still high frequency for all core with some offset for AVX 512. I believe that with direct die cooling results might be even better.
Right now the 3700X has near identical performance to a 9900K, they are within 5% of each other typically, and the 3700X draws 1/2 - 1/3 the power of the 9900K. This is when they are both running stock performance. That means that the Ryzen has far better efficiency than the Intel.
Intel is trust worthy? 9900K has 95W TDP, but out of box without any overclocking it runs 4.7GHz all core turbo drawing over anywhere from 150-190W depending on motherboard.
How many times you need to be told, Intel CPU runs turbo out of the box by default without any mess with BIOS? What's the point of having a TDP at a speed that your processor never runs at?
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
171 Comments
View All Comments
Teckk - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
What is the peak power consumption for Core i9-10940X and 3950X given their TDPs 165 and 105W?deil - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
360W and 130W respectively if we should look at how they treated TDP in the pastdeil - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
I was not far from the truth:https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Y2BXYaZKaWsuFSWW...
300 intel
and
180 AMD
Teckk - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
Wow ! :|Gondalf - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
Ummm don't trust much in AMD marketing slides.AMD draw less only because the all core setup is unable to run at high clock, they barely can go a little over 4Ghz all core. Intel all core setup can go near 5Ghz for a short period (or longer if cooling setup allow this)..
So at he end there is not this high peformance watt advantage they are saying, expecially because they are stuck to CB and do not show others benches to support their numbers.
Bet on other workloads Intel is better than AMD in efficence.
The long story of benches......
Eliadbu - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
If you can handle the heat Intel CPU can run very high my i9 7900x is running at 4.8ghz all coees albeit quite hot under load but still high frequency for all core with some offset for AVX 512. I believe that with direct die cooling results might be even better.schujj07 - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
Right now the 3700X has near identical performance to a 9900K, they are within 5% of each other typically, and the 3700X draws 1/2 - 1/3 the power of the 9900K. This is when they are both running stock performance. That means that the Ryzen has far better efficiency than the Intel.airdrifting - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
Intel is trust worthy? 9900K has 95W TDP, but out of box without any overclocking it runs 4.7GHz all core turbo drawing over anywhere from 150-190W depending on motherboard.eddman - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
How many times it needs to be pointed out; intel's TDP does not cover turbo, certainly not a sustained one.airdrifting - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link
How many times you need to be told, Intel CPU runs turbo out of the box by default without any mess with BIOS? What's the point of having a TDP at a speed that your processor never runs at?