Gaming: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX12)

The latest instalment of the Tomb Raider franchise does less rising and lurks more in the shadows with Shadow of the Tomb Raider. As expected this action-adventure follows Lara Croft which is the main protagonist of the franchise as she muscles through the Mesoamerican and South American regions looking to stop a Mayan apocalyptic she herself unleashed. Shadow of the Tomb Raider is the direct sequel to the previous Rise of the Tomb Raider and was developed by Eidos Montreal and Crystal Dynamics and was published by Square Enix which hit shelves across multiple platforms in September 2018. This title effectively closes the Lara Croft Origins story and has received critical acclaims upon its release.

The integrated Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark is similar to that of the previous game Rise of the Tomb Raider, which we have used in our previous benchmarking suite. The newer Shadow of the Tomb Raider uses DirectX 11 and 12, with this particular title being touted as having one of the best implementations of DirectX 12 of any game released so far.

AnandTech CPU Gaming 2019 Game List
Game Genre Release Date API IGP Low Med High
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Action Sep
2018
DX12 720p
Low
1080p
Medium
1440p
High
4K
Highest
*Strange Brigade is run in DX12 and Vulkan modes

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

SoTR IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

Diving into Shadow of the Tomb Raider, we have another game that’s mostly GPU-bound at its 1080p settings. At 1080p Medium the 9900K is actually a step behind the 7900K – noisy results in their purest form – while at 720p Low it’s still technically behind the 9700K. Either way, once we turn down our settings low enough to remove the GPU bottleneck, its overall another typical showing for the new CFL-R processors. Intel’s latest and greatest is several percent ahead of its predecessors, but none of these games are in a position to really take advantage of the extra two cores. So instead it’s all about frequency and L3 caches.

Though this game (like so many others) does seem to reinforce the idea that the 9600K is the new 8700K. The 8700K is still ahead by a few frames at CPU-bound settings, but despite losing HT, the 9600K is still hanging in the fight for a noticeably lower price.

Gaming: Far Cry 5 Gaming: F1 2018
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • mkaibear - Sunday, October 28, 2018 - link

    Yes. Because MSRP is set by the manufacturer and the retail price is set by the retailer. And otherwise they'd have to update the article every single time a price changes.
  • Outlander_04 - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    So not value for money, definitely not value for money for gamers, and TWO HUNDRED AND TEN INSANE WATTS OF POWER DRAW.
    Funniest thing I have heard for a while now
  • Tkan2155 - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    No way im getting this 180 watts. 7nm will help to save energy. Amd need to take down intel. Lets do it together. I cannot stand intel anymore.
  • AutomaticTaco - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Revised power consumption. First motherboard was over-voltage.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen...

    Also, when Overclocked, and set to 1.075v for CPU the consumption actually dropped to 127W max.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen...
  • WannaBeOCer - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Can you post power consumption with MCE Off? The 9900K is a 4.3GHz processor not a 4.7GHz. MCE Auto on Asus boards boost the CPU to 4.7GHz on all 8 cores.
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, October 21, 2018 - link

    I remember there was much debate a year or so ago about that, but the whole issue seems to have faded away.
  • Synomenon - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Will the "Thermalright TRUE Spirit 120M BW Rev.A" with push / pull fans be enough to cool the 9900K?

    http://thermalright.com/product/true-spirit-120m-b...
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, October 21, 2018 - link

    At stock, maybe. Oc'd, almost certainly not.
  • daxpax - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    funny there's not 2700x included in benchmarks where AMD has advantage. clearly intel sponsored article
  • kaosou - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    I have a bit of a problem with the price you put on all the charts for ThreadRipper 1920X, at the time the article is posted, you can find TR 1920X at around USD 400, and the USD 799 price you put in the chart is very misleading.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now