HPE DLBS, Caffe2: ResNet50 and ImageNet

On that relevant note, we'll take a look at HPE Deep Learning Benchmark Suite, part of their Deep Learning Cookbook. With a different angle than usual DL benchmark suites, its wide-ranging test-running modularity lends itself to quickly diagnose issues or bottlenecks on hardware platforms, which would be useful for an organization like HPE. Focused mostly on NVIDIA GPUs running computer vision CNNs, the DLBS setup is Volta-aware and is essentially outputs throughput and time metrics only, with some advanced monitoring and visualization tools that are only somewhat user-friendly.

For our purposes, it allows us to corroborate the NVIDIA Caffe2 Docker benchmark, so we train and inference with a ResNet50 model on ImageNet. But as the models and implementations are different, these throughput numbers shouldn't be directly compared to NVIDIA's Caffe2 Docker test.

DL Training: DLBS Caffe2 - ResNet50 and ImageNet Throughput

During the training benchmarking, certain batch sizes for Titan V refused to run, but generally, we see the same trend as before, with FP16 and tensor cores providing higher throughput.

We see the same trends continue with inferencing. Unfortunately, the DLBS Caffe2 test does not seem to support INT8 inferencing.

DL Inference: DLBS Caffe2 - ResNet50 and ImageNet Throughput

NVIDIA Caffe2 Docker: ResNet50 and ImageNet HPE DLBS TensorRT: ResNet50 and ImageNet
Comments Locked

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    It's not that hard, really. They're just saying Nvidia made a library (cuDNN), so that different deep learning frameworks don't each have to hand-optimize code for things like its exotic tensor cores.

    For their part, AMD has a similar library they call MIOpen.
  • philehidiot - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    Why thank you. That now does help it make a little more sense. The maths does make sense but the computer science is generally beyond me.
  • aelizo - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    At that price point, I would have liked to see some comparison to 2xTinan Xp, or even some comparison to 3x1080Ti's.
    Last year I saw some comparison between this sets on pytorch:
    https://medium.com/@u39kun/titan-v-vs-1080-ti-head...
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    I'm suspicious that he's not actually using the tensor cores. The V100/GV100 also has double-rate fp16, like the P100/GP100 before it. So, a < 2x improvement from going to 16-bit suggests it might only be using the packed half-precision instructions, rather than the tensor cores.

    Either that or he's not using batching and is completely limited by memory bottlenecks.
  • aelizo - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    I suspect something similar, that is Why Nate could have done a great job with a similar comparison.
  • Nate Oh - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    Unfortunately, we only have 1 Titan Xp, which is actually on loan from TH. These class of devices are (usually) not sampled by NVIDIA so we could not have pursued what you suggest. We split custody of Titan V, and that alone was not an insignificant investment.

    Additionally, mGPU DL analysis introduces a whole new can of worms. As some may have noticed, I have not mentioned NCCL/MPI, NVLink, Volta mGPU enhancements, All Reduce, etc. It's definitely a topic for further investigation if the demand and resources match.
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, July 10, 2018 - link

    Multi-GPU scaling is getting somewhat esoteric, but perhaps a good topic for future articles.

    Would be cool to see the effect of NVLink, if you can get access to such a system in the cloud. Maybe Nvidia will give you some sort of "press" access to their cloud?
  • ballsystemlord - Saturday, July 7, 2018 - link

    Here are some spelling/grammar corrections. You write far fewer than most of the other authors at anandtech ( If Ian had written this I would have need 2 pages for all the corrections :) ). Good job!

    "And Volta does has those separate INT32 units."
    You mean "have".
    And Volta does have those separate INT32 units.

    "For our purposes, the tiny image dataset of CIFAR10 works fine as running a single-node on a dataset like ImageNet with non-professional hardware that could be old as Kepler"...
    Missing "as".
    For our purposes, the tiny image dataset of CIFAR10 works fine as running a single-node on a dataset like ImageNet with non-professional hardware that could be as old as Kepler...

    "Moving forward, we're hoping that MLPerf and similar efforts make good headway, so that we can tease out a bit more secrets from GPUs."
    Grammar error.
    Moving forward, we're hoping that MLPerf and similar efforts make good headway, so that we can tease out a bit more of the secrets from GPUs.
  • mode_13h - Saturday, July 7, 2018 - link

    Yeah, if that's the worst you found, no one would even *suspect* him for being a lolcat.
  • Vanguarde - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    I purchased this card to get better frames in Witcher 3 at 4K everything maxed out, heavily modded. Never dips below 60fps and usually near 80-100fps

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now