HPE DLBS TensorRT: ResNet50 and ImageNet

The other unique aspect of HPE DLBS is the feature of a benchmark for TensorRT, NVIDIA's inference optimizing engine. In recent years, NVIDIA has pushed to integrate it with new DL features like INT8/DP4A and tensor core 16-bit accumulator mode for inferencing.

Using a Caffe model, TensorRT adjusts the model as needed for inferencing at a given precision.

DL Inference: DLBS TensorRT- ResNet50 and ImageNet Throughput

In total, we ran batch sizes 64, 512, and 1024 for Titan X (Maxwell) and Titan Xp, and batch sizes 128, 256, and 640 for Titan V; the results were within 1 - 5% of the other batch sizes, so we've not included them in the graph.

The high INT8 performance of Titan Xp somewhat corroborates with the GEMM/convolution performance; both workloads seem to be utilizing DP4A. Meanwhile, it's not clear how Titan V implements DP4A. all we know is that it is supported by the Volta instruction set. And Volta does has those separate INT32 units.

HPE DLBS Caffe2: ResNet50 and ImageNet DAWNBench: Image Classification (CIFAR10)
Comments Locked

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • krazyfrog - Saturday, July 7, 2018 - link

    I don't think so.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/12170/nvidia-titan-...
  • mode_13h - Saturday, July 7, 2018 - link

    Yeah, I mean why else do you think they built the DGX Station?

    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/dgx-stati...

    They claim "AI", but I'm sure it was just an excuse they told their investors.
  • keg504 - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link

    "With Volta, there has little detail of anything other than GV100 exists..." (First page)
    What is this sentence supposed to be saying?
  • Nate Oh - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link

    Apologies, was a brain fart :)

    I've reworked the sentence, but the gist is: GV100 is the only Volta silicon that we know of (outside of an upcoming Drive iGPU)
  • junky77 - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link

    Thanks

    Any thoughts about Google TPUv2 in comparison?
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link

    TPUv2 is only 45 TFLOPS/chip. They initially grabbed a lot of attention with a 180 TFLOPS figure, but that turned out to be per-board.

    I'm not sure if they said how many TFLOPS/w.
  • SirPerro - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    TPUv3 was announced in May with 8x the performance of TPUv2 for a total of a 1 PF per pod
  • tuxRoller - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link

    Since utilization is, apparently, an issue with these workloads, I'm interested in seeing how radically different architectures, such as tpu2+ and the just announced ibm ai accelerator (https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors... which looks like a monster.
  • MDD1963 - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    4 ordinary people will buy this....by mistake, thinking it is a gamer. :)
  • philehidiot - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link

    "With DL researchers and academics successfully using CUDA to train neural network models faster, it was only a matter of time before NVIDIA released their cuDNN library of optimized deep learning primitives, of which there was ample precedent with the HPC-focused BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines) and corresponding cuBLAS. So cuDNN abstracted away the need for researchers to create and optimize CUDA code for DL performance. As for AMD’s equivalent to cuDNN, MIOpen was only released last year under the ROCm umbrella, though currently is only publicly enabled in Caffe."

    Whatever drugs you're on that allow this to make any sense, I need some. Being a layman, I was hoping maybe 1/5th of this might make sense. I'm going back to the porn. </headache>

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now