Last year, Microsemi released a new generation of 12Gbps SAS controller chips, then incorporated them into a variety of SAS/SATA host bus adapter (HBA) and RAID cards under their Adaptec brand. Now, their SmartRAID family of advanced RAID cards is getting two new models that bring new features to the product line.

First up is the SmartRAID 3162-8i, which decodes to indicate a card with 8 internal ports and a 2GB DRAM cache with power loss protection. This is the first Adaptec RAID card to feature a fully-integrated power loss protection scheme including supercapacitors on the card itself. Previous SmartRAID cards such as the 3152-8i have all required an external supercapacitor module to be mounted in another expansion slot or elsewhere in the server. Putting supercapacitors on the half-height half-length card makes it fairly crowded and has the potential to restrict air flow across the controller, so Microsemi has upgraded many components on the card with industrial-grade parts rated for higher temperatures. This has also allowed Microsemi to spec the card for 150 linear feet per minute (LFM) of airflow instead of the 200 LFM required by the 3152-8i and similar cards.

The second new product is the SmartRAID 3162-8i/e, which uses the same hardware as above but is the first SmartRAID card to enable the encryption capabilities of the SmartROC 3100 controller chip. This controller-based encryption offers an alternative to using self-encrypting drives (SEDs) or software encryption on the host CPU. Microsemi brands this encryption system as maxCrypto, and touts its combination of the minimal performance overhead of SEDs with the flexibility of software encryption to support things like a mix of encrypted and unencrypted volumes, and re-keying or re-encrypting existing data in-place.

The encryption keys are derived using a master passphrase that generates a master key stored on the controller card. Each encrypted RAID volume created on the controller gets a separate volume encryption key generated by the master key. In the event that the RAID card dies, a replacement card can be swapped in and can reconstruct all the volume keys using the original master passphrase. The cipher used us AES256 in XTS mode.

The new cards are in volume production now.

Source: Microsemi

POST A COMMENT

6 Comments

View All Comments

  • JoeyJoJo123 - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    Maybe just me, but I don't particularly feel that hardware RAID cards are in a good spot these days. Ideally you have PC hardware running software (an OS that supports ZFS filesystem, such as FreeNAS), and instead of RAID cards, you'd use JBOD cards (so that the OS can communicate directly with the HDDs, and so that you can interface many many more HDDs than you'd normally have direct SATA ports for).

    I'm sure there's still a big market for hardware RAID cards, but I imagine with how many more features you get through things like ZFS that hardware RAID may fall off in the future.
    Reply
  • npz - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    Probably more useful in Windows than *nix.

    Direct ReFS is only available in Enterprise, Server and Pro for Workstation licenses and Storage Spaces on top of NTFS has bad performance and is still kinda iffy on reliability. ReFS itself from earlier tests had some issues, but I don't know if that has improved.

    There might some use for hardware encryption on a loaded system even on *nix though. But on dedicated storage servers that's not running very high compute workloads over lots of disks, I don't see the advantage.
    Reply
  • npz - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    Actually I'm thinking that while a ZFS in PC/FreeBSD/FreeNAS replaces this for a dedicate server (but not in a workstation), on Linux it still could get rid of headaches, performance and reliability issues with layers of mdadm, LVM, encryption layer, then choices of ext4 or BTRFS or BTRFS on top of ext4 (because raid5/6 isn't stable yet) Reply
  • npz - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    edit: meant BTRFS on top of mdadm and/or stacked with encryption layers for encryption rather than direct BTRFS Reply
  • Kraszmyl - Thursday, July 26, 2018 - link

    ZFS is annoyingly resource hungry and still can't easily modify raids, along with other issues.

    That said ZFS does have a very attractive price of free, so it's hard to complain about its short comings. So it's a pick what you need for the job like most things in enterprise.
    Reply
  • iAPX - Tuesday, July 31, 2018 - link

    This is a clean little controller to be able to pack a lot of hard-drive into a workstation or a personal VM server. It would be interesting to know it's support of SATA hard drives (some "enterprise" controllers did work with them but at a costly performance price). Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now