Section by Andrei Frumusanu

CPU MT Performance: SPEC 2006, SPEC 2017

We’ve noted the earlier discussions of Intel’s TDP handling and how Tiger Lake has 15W and 28W operating modes, and where this comes into play the most is in multi-threaded scenarios where the platform is generally power envelope limited, having to otherwise clock down.

We’re showcasing the MT performance in SPEC for both the Tiger Lake modes, comparing it to both the 15W Ice Lake and AMD Renoir chips. As a note, the 15W Ice Lake platform had a sustained power draw of 18W which makes things not quite as apples-to-apples. Also as a reminder, the Intel systems have 4 cores and are running 8 thread instances, while the AMD system has 8 cores and is running 16 threads.

SPECint2017 Rate-N Estimated Scores

At first glance, the Tiger Lake system performs quite well versus its predecessor, but that’s mostly only in the 28W mode. At 15W, the generational boost, while it is there, isn’t that significant. This might point out that efficiency isn’t all that much better this generation.

AMD’s platform scales incredibly well in execution-bound workloads as it fully takes advantage of double the core count. In more memory-heavy workloads, the Zen2 cores here seem to be lacking sufficient resources and scale below the performance of Intel’s 4-core designs in some workloads.

SPECfp2017 Rate-N Estimated Scores

In the floating-point results, it’s again a matter of TDP headroom as well as memory performance scalability. In the 15W results, the Tiger Lake chip posts rather small improvements over its Ice Lake counterpart, whilst in the 28W mode the gains are more considerable and even manages to outperform the AMD system more often than not.

SPEC2017 Rate-N Estimated Total

In the overall scores, the verdict on Tiger Lake is dependent on how you evaluate Intel’s performance gains. At an (semi)equal-TDP level between Tiger Lake and Ice Lake, the improvements in performance are 17%. Intel does reach a larger 51% generational performance boost in its 28W configuration, but at that point we’re talking about quite different cooling solutions inside of a laptop, no longer making this a valid apples-to-apples comparison.

We haven’t had opportunity to test out higher TDP -HS model of Renoir yet, but with the 15W 4800U already mostly tied with the 28W i7-1185G7, we would expect it to notably outperform the Tiger Lake chip.

Overall, Tiger Lake seems to be offering roughly 20% better performance per watt over its predecessor, with increased performance beyond that coming at a cost of higher power consumption.

CPU ST Performance: SPEC 2006, SPEC 2017 CPU Performance: Office and Web
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • Drumsticks - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    This comment seems disingenuous. In the power consumption article, even AMD is boosting up to nearly 40W. It looks like Tiger Lake will be more power efficient than Renoir in lightly threaded workloads, and Renoir would be more efficient in heavily threaded ones that can use the entire SoC.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Renoir boosts up to about 35W across 8 cores. Tiger Lake boosts to 50W across 4. That's a 42% difference. Even if Renoir actually hit 40W, that'd still be a 25% increase in power draw while boosting.
  • JayNor - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I usually have my laptop plugged in... don't really care how long the battery lasts then. Seems like the ability to choose higher performance is a nice feature.
  • ikjadoon - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Did we look at the same charts? Area under the curve, my friend. In extreme usages for thin-and-light laptops,

    15 W Renoir: 2842 seconds for 62660 joules
    15 W Ice Lake: 4733 seconds for 82344 joules
    15 W Tiger Lake: 4311 seconds for 64854 joules

    If we're looking at multi-threaded power consumption, Renoir & TGL should be close with a small lead for Renoir.

    Instantaneous power draw is higher for Tiger Lake, but that 43 W is for mere seconds and not indicative of actually how high it boosts for the entire period.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    We did, I just hadn't had time to take the numbers in fully - and you're absolutely right.
  • RedOnlyFan - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Lol 1st read the article before commenting. Take your fanboy stuff to wccftech you will fit in perfectly.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Whatever you say, buddy 🤷
  • Alistair - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    So it is just Ice Lake again without any major improvements outside the integrated GPU people don't care about. Get double the cores for less money with Renoir.
  • Alistair - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    This isn't 2019 anymore... we went from 4 to 8 cores for the same price and each core is +20 percent with AMD in the last 6 months.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Bingo.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now