Xe-LP GPU Performance: Deus Ex Mankind Divided

Deus Ex is a franchise with a wide level of popularity. Despite the Deus Ex: Mankind Divided (DEMD) version being released in 2016, it has often been heralded as a game that taxes the CPU. It uses the Dawn Engine to create a very complex first-person action game with science-fiction based weapons and interfaces. The game combines first-person, stealth, and role-playing elements, with the game set in Prague, dealing with themes of transhumanism, conspiracy theories, and a cyberpunk future. The game allows the player to select their own path (stealth, gun-toting maniac) and offers multiple solutions to its puzzles.

DEMD has an in-game benchmark, an on-rails look around an environment showcasing some of the game’s most stunning effects, such as lighting, texturing, and others. Even in 2020, it’s still an impressive graphical showcase when everything is jumped up to the max.

Deus Ex Mankind Divided: 600p Minimum QualityDeus Ex Mankind Divided: 1080p Maximum Quality

At the minimum settings, all of the integrated graphics are easily playable, with AMD winning at 15 W but the 28 W Tiger Lake goes a bit above that, within reaching distance of the desktop APU. At a more regular 1080p Maximum, the 20 FPS is perhaps a bit too slow for regular gameplay.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Civilization VI Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XIV
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • IanCutress - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    ... Did you actually read the review.
  • DannyH246 - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Ian - as you are fully aware its a reference unit supplied by Intel with various restrictions applied I.e no battery tests allowed.

    As you are also fully aware battery Performance is super important when it comes to this form factor of device.

    As such this ‘review’ serves no purpose apart from to try and influence people buying laptops to hold off buying AMD and wait for ‘Intels new super chip‘. I.e the same message they have been pumping out the last 2years+. Look what we’ve got coming blah blah blah.

    So as I said - wake me up when there’s actual hardware available and we can have a proper test.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I want to see retail products as well, but we at least get an understanding of processor and graphics performance. Battery life will vary greatly from one laptop to another anyway given configurable TDP, screen resolution and size, battery capacity, and a bunch of other factors. In addition to that, the limitations in testing were disclosed at the beginning of the article so readers were advised had they any sort of reading comprehension.

    While there are some fair complaints to make about AT (where's the edit button?!), I don't think there is any sort of bias influencing the results of this article.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Some people just want things to complain about 🤷
  • IanCutress - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    You're coming at it from the product point of view. We're coming at it from a semiconductor point of view. That's why we have details about the core, the cache, and raw performance on standardised metrics. Performance is one piece of the puzzle, I agree, for end products. But getting a chance to test one example of performance 6+ weeks before retail availability is something I've been pushing Intel and AMD to offer for years. Qualcomm already does with their Snapdragon reference designs. Intel and AMD are slowly getting on board.
  • PixyMisa - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    The standout point of Tiger Lake is single-threaded performance, and that's unlikely to change much on production hardware. From that perspective this preview is great.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    If you can't draw some obvious conclusions about likely battery life from the power charts, then maybe this isn't the site for you?

    The eventual products will all have different battery lifr based on individual implementations anyway, so testing a single unit and trying to extrapolate to others really wouldn't get you very far. This is a solid preview that sets us up to at least expect better efficiency from TGL.
  • GeoffreyA - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Surprised, but quite impressed with Tiger Lake. Good job, Intel.
  • bernstein - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    a bit confused about the conclusion...

    looking at the tests i mostly see amd's 4880u being much faster than intel's 15W part... and for current task also a bit better efficiency wise (due to being faster). so it seems the 4800u is the better part.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Depends on your workload, basically. Same goes for GPU performance. Seems like a genuinely competitive situation for the first time in a long time!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now