Xe-LP GPU Performance: Deus Ex Mankind Divided

Deus Ex is a franchise with a wide level of popularity. Despite the Deus Ex: Mankind Divided (DEMD) version being released in 2016, it has often been heralded as a game that taxes the CPU. It uses the Dawn Engine to create a very complex first-person action game with science-fiction based weapons and interfaces. The game combines first-person, stealth, and role-playing elements, with the game set in Prague, dealing with themes of transhumanism, conspiracy theories, and a cyberpunk future. The game allows the player to select their own path (stealth, gun-toting maniac) and offers multiple solutions to its puzzles.

DEMD has an in-game benchmark, an on-rails look around an environment showcasing some of the game’s most stunning effects, such as lighting, texturing, and others. Even in 2020, it’s still an impressive graphical showcase when everything is jumped up to the max.

Deus Ex Mankind Divided: 600p Minimum QualityDeus Ex Mankind Divided: 1080p Maximum Quality

At the minimum settings, all of the integrated graphics are easily playable, with AMD winning at 15 W but the 28 W Tiger Lake goes a bit above that, within reaching distance of the desktop APU. At a more regular 1080p Maximum, the 20 FPS is perhaps a bit too slow for regular gameplay.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Civilization VI Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XIV
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • JayNor - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I noted from Intel's Thunderbolt 3 documents that the ports are bidirectional and can, for example, support pcie send while receiving display port on the same cable.

    Is it possible, for example, to use an external GPU card with one cable to display output on your laptop's display?
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    I understand that you can, but it drops performance significantly.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Oof, those GPU benchmarks are painful. It's become clear that their predictions were all based on LPDDR5
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Yes the GPU results are somewhat disappointing, but there is only so much you can do when sharing bandwidth to RAM with the CPU cores and everything else. Of course, there is also significant latency to contend with when you don't have GDDR5/6 available to the graphics processor.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Absolutely - it's become pretty clear that's why AMD decided to go with 8 CUs on Renoir. I wasn't expecting anything huge from Xe on TGL, but Intel were pushing it as a big win and really it's just not - at least, not in this form. A ~20% bandwidth boost might well translate into big gains on later devices.
  • JayNor - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    false, they used lpddr4x for the benchmarks.
  • Spunjji - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    I think perhaps you misread what I said. Intel were previously showing numbers suggesting a huge leap in performance for their Xe iGPU which isn't borne out by the testing done here. I'm suggesting that it's because Intel were quoting numbers based on an LPDDR5 implementation. They could have just been lying, though. You seem to be suggesting the latter?
  • undervolted_dc - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Ok but why there are no power consumption of the ryzen ? I see a 28w tiger lake which have a peak of 50+ and an average of 35 and another "28w" tiger lake which instaed have a peak of 50+ and an average of 38w..,
    is the 4800u in thermal throttling because the tiger lake is better cooled ? this "reference" and the lack of real power usage comparision is "strange" to me... we started from the intel benchmarks.. and now we hare here ... where will be in 1 more months when the tiger lake will be in stores with also it's prices.. will be still comparable to the 4800u? ( and I'm also sure that asus will not cover air intake for the tiger lake one to be able to sell them against the 4800u given the higher prices they have to ask .. )
    and where we will be then when zen3/cezanne will be revealed ? you will see the zen3 ipc and freq gain in 1 month.. ( maybe even before tiger lake approach stores ) .. I see no Baskin here..
  • undervolted_dc - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Also ram is unfair for this comparison:
    intel LPDDR4X-4266
    vs amd DDR4-3200

    but again.. at the end of the day the only thing that matter is the price/performance/power-usage balance for laptop, and here I see only performance comparison..(in unknown thermal/power condition for tests) and with no words about price..

    we see here a coming-soon quad core intel with a power usage higher than 1 year old 8 core amd which is also faster in full speed tests ( not in gpu , but it's the old navi chip )

    yes, single core bench the intel win.. but their high freq single core are 20% higher freq than AMD ones, are 20% faster, and eat 50% more power , are ~1 year newer , and probably will costs 50% more.. so who is the real winner?
  • undervolted_dc - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    a mere 4500u with lpddr4x show an average +17% improvements in benchmarks..

    https://optocrypto.com/amd-ryzen-4000-adding-suppo...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now