The Intel Core i9-9900KS Review: The 5 GHz Consumer Special
by Dr. Ian Cutress on October 31, 2019 10:45 AM ESTGaming: F1 2018
Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained; otherwise, we should see any newer versions of Codemasters' EGO engine find its way into F1. Graphically demanding in its own right, F1 2018 keeps a useful racing-type graphics workload in our benchmarks.
We use the in-game benchmark, set to run on the Montreal track in the wet, driving as Lewis Hamilton from last place on the grid. Data is taken over a one-lap race.
All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.
| AnandTech | IGP | Low | Medium | High |
| Average FPS |  |
 |
 |
 |
| 95th Percentile |  |
 |
 |
 |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
235 Comments
View All Comments
amnesia0287 - Saturday, November 16, 2019 - link
Can’t tell if playing stupid or srs.The IPC advantage is 10%, the clock speed advantage is >10%.
Intel chips all the cores are able to boost to the same levels. AMD chips now have varying spec cores and only the best 1-2 hit the advertised speeds and only when there are only a few threads running. If you are doing heavy multitasking, most of the AMD cores will be dramatically slower than those of the 9900ks.
That said the AMD chips still have a number of other advantages such as more pci bandwidth and no tiny DMI bottleneck. Lower cost, lower power use and generally more cores.
Right now it really comes down to what you plan to use it for. There is little doubt AMD is in a better spot right now, but it remains to be seen if they can hold it past 2021 as intel transitions to 7nm and MCM.
Korguz - Saturday, November 16, 2019 - link
" The IPC advantage is 10%, the clock speed advantage is >10%." and WHY do you think intel has the lead, even barely, in some cases. because of the clock speed advantage. Intel's cpus NEED this advantage just to keep the performance they have. think about it, a LOWER clocked chip over all is performing about the same,( depending on usage ) and in some cases better, then the higher clocked equivalents clock these chips the same, and i bet the story would be quite different. " Intel chips all the cores are able to boost to the same levels " at quite a bit more power usage too." 2021 as intel transitions to 7nm and MCM. " more like IF intel can transition to 7nm by then, look how long it has taken them to get to 10nm..
shaolin95 - Monday, November 11, 2019 - link
*cough, cough* butthurt AMD fanboy detected *cough, cough*Qasar - Monday, November 11, 2019 - link
how so ??? seems there are more intel fans but hurt lately...peevee - Friday, November 1, 2019 - link
:)Funny, I had exactly the same thought.
But honestly, for many real world uses (games etc) 4 cores at even faster frequency would be even better. Physically separated on the die as far as possible (in the corners) by huge amount of shared L3.
I guess 5GHz base/6GHz turbo is not out of the question within the same TDP with liquid cooling.
eva02langley - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link
A joke of a CPU. How can this cost more than a 3900x?eva02langley - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link
Not to mention that with the price gouging, you are almost near the MSRP of the 3950x.prophet001 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link
People want this for clock speed.12 slow cores aren't helpful if you need a few fast ones.
eva02langley - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link
AHAHAHA... okay, we have a blind fanboy here. Do you know anything about IPC? This CPU get destroyed in EVERYTHING except old games running outdated engines at 1080p. SO unless you buy this with a 2080 TI and a 240Hz 1080p monitor, you are not going to benefit from it.Basically, with a budget, the 9900KS is a waste of money, period. The money you save buying a 3700x and investing in your GPU will give you some serious gaming performances increase.
xenol - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link
Honestly anything more than a midrange CPU and GPU is a waste of money for most people.