ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace Conclusion

Looking throughout the entire X570 product stack, there's a small handful out of 35+ models that aren't targetting gamers, but the only one to target the workstation users is the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace. This sets it apart from the rest of the product stack and it's not just in the WS branding, but in its core feature set too. Firstly, it's the only X570 model to have three full-length PCIe 4.0 slots that run at a minimum of x8: x16, x8/x8, and x8/x8/x8. This is useful for users looking to run three NVIDIA graphics cards for various tasks such as gaming, rendering and virtual machines. Another important workstation related feature comes with the Realtek RTL8117 Gigabit NIC which allows users to hook it up with the ASUS Control Center Express application for virtual machine deployment, dedicated remote access through the Ethernet port, and even affords users the ability to install operating systems with PME, and PXE support. This is supplemented by an additional Ethernet port which is controlled by an Intel I211-AT Gigabit NIC.

Another notable inclusion a Realtek ALC1200S HD audio codec which comes geared with an EMI shield and PCB separation for a much better experience, and the out of the box DPC Latency performance wasn't too bad either. The power delivery on the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace consists of a 12+2 phase power delivery running in a 6+1 configuration with an ASP1405I PWM controller and 14 x IR3555 60 A power stages for the CPU teamed up in pairs, with 2 x IR3555 60 A power stages for the SoC section; also teamed up with aim on reducing transient response times in the phase switches for more efficiency, and ultimately better thermal performance. Touching more on the thermal performance in our new power delivery thermal analysis, the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace out of the boards we have tested so far proved to be exceptional with a recorded temperature of 52°C measured from our thermal probe. 

Touching on the overclocking performance and the WS X570-Ace once again proved its worth with consistent performance in our POV-Ray benchmark testing, and managed to push our testbed Ryzen 7 3700X processor to its limit of 4.3 GHz at 1.375 V. We did manage to get into Windows 10 with 4.4 GHz, but it required too much CPU VCore and as a result, was highly unstable and too warm for even our premium 240 mm AIO CPU cooler to handle. In terms of cooling, the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace has six 4-pin fan headers with two for CPU fans, one for an AIO water pump, and four for chassis fans. Performance in our CPU and gaming test suite is competitive and the only caveats came in POST time which is down to the initializing of the Realtek RTL8117 Gigabit NIC during POST; once this is turned off, we managed to reduce the booting time into Windows 10 by around 13 seconds; not an issue for workstation users, but certainly doesn't look attractive to users that are impatient.

Looking at the rear panel, ASUS includes four USB 3.1 G2 Type-A and a single USB 3.1 Type-C port, with a further two USB 3.1 G1 Type-A ports. This is certainly ample for a board of this calibre and users looking to add more can add four USB 2.0 ports via two headers, and an additional two USB 3.1 G1 Type-A ports across two headers. For users looking to use Ryzen APUs, there are two video outputs including an HDMI 1.4b, and a DisplayPort 1.2 output. The Realtek ALC1200 HD audio codec is 8-channel and as a result, offers users with five 3.5 mm audio jacks and S/PDIF optical output; there's also a front panel audio connector located next to the audio PCB.


The bottom full-length PCIe 4.0 slot on the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace operates at x8

It would be unfair to compare the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace motherboard to other models in the product stack due to its focus on workstation and professional use, but for $380, this model does offer everything needed to create a good looking system for gaming and workstation use and even without all the integrated RGB LEDs, this actually adds appeal to this model. The ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace ($380) is priced the same is its gaming-centric ROG X570 Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi ($380) model, and is slightly more expensive than the MSI MEG X570 Ace ($370) which we previously reviewed at launch. Aside from the full-length PCIe 4.0 x8 slot triple-header and remote access capabilities, the Pro WS X570-Ace is also unique as it's the only X570 model with a PCIe 3.0 x4 U.2 port onboard, and the two PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots operate at x4/x2, which does cap the performance of the second M.2 slot a little; this is most likely a PCIe lane limitation of running a full-length PCIe 4.0 x8 slot from the chipset in comparison to the regular x4 on all other X570 models.

The ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace goes in a different direction for users looking to build a dedicated workstation, but with Ryzen's Pro CPUs coming in at a much lower cost than AMD's own TR4/SP3 platform overall, it gives an element of value for users to grasp while being able to spend the budget saved on other areas such as VGA and storage.

For casual users, there are other models which offer more consumer-friendly features for a better price. But overall the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace is a good buy for users looking for a more professional feature set on the X570 chipset, for those interested in remote access and VMWare deployment, and triple full-length PCIe 4.0 x8 slot layout. 

AnandTech Ryzen 3000 CPU and X570 Motherboard Coverage

Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    It's a stylistic choice. It's difficult (pointless) to debate the merits of someone's feelings about how something looks since that sort of thing boils down to opinion and taste. No matter which direction you go, those preferences are not rooted so much in attainment of functionality. Where the frustration begins is within a fairly large segment of the potential market for high end consumer and prosumer computing equipment has no desire to purchase gamer-styled products that typically feature RGB lighting. That segmet's demand is unsatisfied because manufacturers are not catering to them for various reasons and therefore there will be some that speak out in the small hope that a company will acknowledge the unmet demand and sell a suitable product. There's nothing childish about what's happening. You're just seeing economic forces and personal tastes at work.
  • Canam Aldrin - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    No thunderbolt 3, no 10GbE. That really holds it back from being a serious workstation board. I couldn’t use it.
  • haukionkannel - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    Then msi creation could be suitable to you. Very well done IO section in that board. It seems to miss the ecc memory though... but if all that is needed the upcoming threatripper solutions could ansver that too!
  • Dug - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    I agree. When looking for a new system board, this wouldn't do.
    I checked their site and there is no mention of thunderbolt support anywhere.
  • hubick - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    I agree. And the second M.2 at only x2 is disappointing, as that basically ruins it for RAID 0/1.

    I like AMD for PCIe 4.0, but I want I/O, not x3 GPU, so I was looking at the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme, which has x16/x8/x4, ECC, 10GbE (Aquantia boo), triple x4 m.2, and 6 SATA ports (enough for a ZFS raidz2 array). I'll probably wait and go Rome or new Threadripper instead to get more lanes though.
  • mjz_5 - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    If you use the third m.2 slot it disables two Sata ports
  • hubick - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    Uhg, that sucks. Thanks for the tip though. In advance of a new system, I grabbed a couple Corsair MP600 I'm running in RAID 0 for my OS now, on PCIe 3.0 though, which is mainly what I'd want the first two slots for - but I'd really like a third to house a ZFS slog device. All the more reason to wait for Threadripper/Rome I guess.
  • mjz_5 - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    Wonder why they included a U.2 port. Would rather have another M.2 port or at least run the second one at full X4
  • haukionkannel - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    U2 is defacto in workstation environment. M2 is more towards the normal consumers.
  • DanNeely - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    To an extent I think it's like Sata-Express a few years ago; the multi-year lead time on board design means they need to guess what adoption will look like a few years in advance of selling the product.

    U.2 does have a presence in the highest end enterprise segment; but I suspect that if they knew it was going to be MIA in the prosumer market they probably would've switched its lanes with an onboard m.2.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now