Test Bed and Setup

As per our processor testing policy, we take a premium category motherboard suitable for the socket, and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the manufacturer's maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible.

It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
AMD 3000*1 R9 3900X
R7 3700X
MSI MEG X570
Ace
7C35v12

7C35v11*2
Wraith Prism G.Skill TridentZ
4x8 GB
DDR4-3200
CL16
16-16-16-36
AMD 2000 R7 2700X
R5 2600X
R5 2500X
ASRock X370
Gaming K4
P4.80 Wraith Max* G.Skill SniperX
2x8 GB
DDR4-2933
AMD 1000 R7 1800X ASRock X370
Gaming K4
P4.80 Wraith Max* G.Skill SniperX
2x8 GB
DDR4-2666
AMD TR4 TR 1920X ASUS ROG
X399 Zenith
0078 Enermax
Liqtech TR4
G.Skill FlareX
4x8GB
DDR4-2666
Intel 9th Gen i9-9900K
i7-9700K
i5-9600K
ASRock Z370
Gaming i7**
P1.70 TRUE
Copper
Crucial Ballistix
4x8GB
DDR4-2666
Intel 8th Gen i7-8086K
i7-8700K
i5-8600K
ASRock Z370
Gaming i7
P1.70 TRUE
Copper
Crucial Ballistix
4x8GB
DDR4-2666
Intel 7th Gen i7-7700K
i5-7600K
GIGABYTE X170
ECC Extreme
F21e Silverstone
AR10-115XS
G.Skill RipjawsV
2x16GB
DDR4-2400
Intel 6th Gen i7-6700K
i5-6600K
GIGABYTE X170
ECC Extreme
F21e Silverstone
AR10-115XS
G.Skill RipjawsV
2x16GB
DDR4-2133
Intel HEDT i9-7900X
i7-7820X
i7-7800X
ASRock X299
OC Formula
P1.40 TRUE
Copper
Crucial Ballistix
4x8GB
DDR4-2666
GPU Sapphire RX 460 2GB (CPU Tests)
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G (Gaming Tests)
PSU Corsair AX860i
Corsair AX1200i
SSD Crucial MX200 1TB

**Crucial MX300 1TB
OS Windows 10 x64 RS3 1709
Spectre and Meltdown Patched


**Windows 10 x64 1903
Spectre and Meltdown Patched
*1 Ryzen 3000 series has been tested in a different environment.

*2 Initial Review BIOS - Graphs results are marked with **
 

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this test bed specifically, but is used in other testing.

Hardware Providers
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
DDR4
Silverstone
Coolers
Silverstone
Fans

Security Mitigrations

The systems have applied the latest Spectre and Meltdown mitigation patches where applicable. Meanwhile we should note that while the ZombieLoad exploit was announced earlier this year as well, the patches for that have not been released yet. We'll be looking at those later on once they hit.

Article Testing Methodology Update (July 8th):

We ran our original review numbers with the latest available firmware for the MSI MEG X570 ACE motherboard last week (Version  7C35v11). On Saturday the 6th MSI had shared with us a notice about a new version coming out, which became available to download to us on Sunday the 7th, the launch day and date of publication of the review.

We’ve had more time to investigate the new firmware, and have discovered extremely large changes in the behaviour of the frequency boosting algorithm. The new firmware (Version 7C35v12) for the motherboard contains AMD’s new ComboPI1.0.0.3.a (AGESA) firmware.

We discovered the following direct measurable effects between the two firmware versions:

(Note: This is a custom test that uses a fine-grained looping timed fixed instruction chain to derive frequency; it showcases single-core frequency)

We notice a significant change in the CPU’s boosting behaviour, now boosting to higher frequencies, and particularly at a faster rate from idle, more correctly matching AMD’s described intended boost behaviour and latency.

We’re currently in the process of re-running all our suite numbers and updating the article where necessary to reflect the new frequency behaviour.

Article Testing Methodology Update (July 9th):

We've updated the article benchmark numbers on the Ryzen 9 3900X. We've seen 3-9% improvements in exclusive ST workloads. MT workloads have remained unchanged, Gaming had both benefits and negatives. We continue to work on getting updated 3700X numbers and filling out the missing pieces.

Original BIOS results are as of first publication are marked with ** in the graphs.

Article Testing Methodology Update (July 10th):

We've also updated our Ryzen 7 3700X results now. Ultimately our conclusions haven't changed, but AMD does narrow the gap a bit more. For a full summary of our findings, please check out this article.

Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903 SPEC2006 & 2017: Industry Standard - ST Performance & IPC
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • beginning - Thursday, July 11, 2019 - link

    I noticed that at the E3 2019 tech day, AMD recommended DDR4-3600 CL16 RAM. I see that 3200 MHz RAM has been used in the AMD testbench. I read the description about avoiding overclocking but 3600 MHz RAMs come with a factory clock of 3600 MHz, right? I know I am missing something. What am I missing?
  • sknaumov - Thursday, July 11, 2019 - link

    Do you plan to make some tests of these CPUs on older, cheaper and colder motherboards? It would be very interesting to see results of b450 chipset and whether it is possible to use DDR4-3600MHz with tight timings on these older boards. Or at least provide more info about what has more priority for memory speed and timings on AMD platform - CPU or chipset.
  • viperswhip - Thursday, July 11, 2019 - link

    I am going to wait to build a PC for a bit, however, I am super excited by this launch and disappointed by the video card launch. I expect to have an AMD chip since Intel has no answer for this, and we shall see on the video cards, but if I was building today I'd probably get a 2070 RTX super.
  • PProchnow - Friday, July 12, 2019 - link

    Here's is Jus' a good ol' boy trying out. No OC off stock Multi but 3333Mhz RAM
    #1
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13863634

    Rather a new rig and it is X470 up to the A.A BIOS and it is MSI Gaming Plus.
    OK link #2 is here and I stroked the DDR$ up top 3333Mhz. I also stroked the fan
    to stay sub 70C. Wild OCs will take water at least "in The Home" versus LiqN2 Lab.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13865361

    BTW where is the Bragging Thread? My MOBO is the MSI X470 Gaming Plus BIOS A.A makes Ryzen 9 go BTW.
    I have yet to up the MULTI in case you want to know. I wonder what good Ocers will get with the right stuff.

    Single-Core Performance
    Memory Score 6431
    Floating Point Score 5409
    Integer Score 5190
    Crypto Score 6888
    Single-Core Score 5589

    You underst and that RAM set at 1672 is 1/2 the common referred to speed. 3344Mhz is the common nomenclature.

    ***Single-Core Score ***Multi-Core Score
    5589 47755
    Geekbench 4.3.4 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)
    Result Information
    Upload Date July 12 2019 08:16 PM
    Views 2
    System Information
    System Information
    Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
    Model Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7B79
    Motherboard Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79)
    Memory 32768 MB DDR4 SDRAM 1672MHz
    Northbridge AMD Ryzen SOC 00
    Southbridge AMD X470 51
    BIOS American Megatrends Inc. A.A0
    Processor Information
    Name AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    Topology 1 Processor, 12 Cores, 24 Threads
    Identifier AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0
    Base Frequency 3.80 GHz
    Maximum Frequency 4.53 GHz
  • Maxiking - Tuesday, July 23, 2019 - link

    Why would anyone brag about something if

    You can't reach 5.0ghz +
    You can't reach even the boost frequency on a single core
    You can't beat consistently competitor's older 14nm cpu architecture which has been on the market since 2016...
    You can't beat RAM OC'ing records either because over 3733mhz IF gets actually downlocked and due tu that, "faster" ram performs worse unless you OC 7400mhz, which is not possible even with liquid nitrogen.
  • PProchnow - Friday, July 12, 2019 - link

    These are my scores with my Ryzen 9 3900X.
    #1
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13863634

    Rather a new rig and it is X470 up to the A.A BIOS and it is MSI Gaming Plus.
    OK link #2 is here and I stroked the DDR$ up top 3333Mhz. I also stroked the fan
    to stay sub 70C. Wild OCs will take water at least "in The Home" versus LiqN2 Lab.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13865361

    BTW where is the Bragging Thread? My MOBO is the MSI X470 Gaming Plus BIOS A.A makes Ryzen 9 go BTW.
    I have yet to up the MULTI in case you want to know. I wonder what good Ocers will get with the right stuff.

    Single-Core Performance
    Memory Score 6431
    Floating Point Score 5409
    Integer Score 5190
    Crypto Score 6888
    Single-Core Score 5589

    You underst and that RAM set at 1672 is 1/2 the common referred to speed. 3344Mhz is the common nomenclature.

    ***Single-Core Score ***Multi-Core Score
    5589 47755
    Geekbench 4.3.4 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)
    Result Information
    Upload Date July 12 2019 08:16 PM
    Views 2
    System Information
    System Information
    Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
    Model Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7B79
    Motherboard Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79)
    Memory 32768 MB DDR4 SDRAM 1672MHz
    Northbridge AMD Ryzen SOC 00
    Southbridge AMD X470 51
    BIOS American Megatrends Inc. A.A0
    Processor Information
    Name AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    Topology 1 Processor, 12 Cores, 24 Threads
    Identifier AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0
    Base Frequency 3.80 GHz
    Maximum Frequency 4.53 GHz

    Now you can cross ref with others.
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    Nice!
  • willis936 - Wednesday, July 17, 2019 - link

    The editor's choice awards are a bit strange to me. Zen 1 didn't receive one even though it was the largest CPU performance increase from a company this century. The i7-4950HQ received an editor's choice silver award even though it had little importance to the industry. And the 3700X, which offers comparable SP performance to competing intel products at a huge discount and smaller power budget gets the same editor's choice level as the i7-4950HQ?
  • willis936 - Wednesday, July 17, 2019 - link

    I know it was a different editor at the time, but the selective excitement is a bit of a bummer. eDRAM was exciting to see at the time and then nothing ever came of it. The enthusiasm of chiplets under the new editor comes through much less. That too is fine. However if the rating system is what it is then I don't think it's much to argue that chiplets are much more disruptive than eDRAM and is already making much larger waves.
  • Maxiking - Monday, July 22, 2019 - link

    AMD fraund getting finally the attention it deserves

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x03FyPQ3a3E

    check at 05m25s

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now