Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • generalako - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    The only one being an apologist here is you CityBlue. In all your rage about Anandtech not testing with mitigations in place, you failed to every take up the fact that Anandtech has also tested the Intel setup with lower RAM speeds than the AMD one. Which is, to use your own words, "hard to take seriously...for not testing with a level, real-world playing field". Changing RAM speed is a simple push of the button on XMP, and both easily support time (not to mention that x570 motherboards isn't something the overwhelming majority of people, for obvious reasons, will buy). Remember, this was a traditional complaint from many users back when Zen 1 came out, and was tested by various vendors out there (like Gamersnexus) with lower RAM speeds and Intel counterparts.
  • CityBlue - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    @generalako as I said in a previous comment, this article and it's benchmarking is so fundamentally flawed that I'm not willing to invest the time to read the article (I mean, seriously - what's the point?) so forgive me for not mentioning other errors/omissions that may have favoured AMD but two wrongs do not make a right, and especially not when the mitigation omission is so egregious.
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    CityBlue, you're spot-on. +1.
  • GreenReaper - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    This is true for the HEDT X-series motherboard as well. 1.40 is from March 2018. There have been three updates since then, including two new instances of microcode, the last from 6 June 2019:
    https://www.asrock.com/MB/Intel/X299%20OC%20Formul...

    This does *not* apply in quite the same way for the GIGABYTE X170 ECC Extreme used for the 7th- and 6th-gen Intel CPUs... but only because it hasn't been updated *by Gigabyte* since the very first patches for Meltdown and Spectre at the start of 2018:
    https://www.gigabyte.com/uk/Motherboard/GA-X170-EX...
  • MLSCrow - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Some of those benchmark results with the i9-7920X are very fishy. In some cases, out-performing Intel CPU's with more advanced cores that have 2/3rd the cores, yet, it somehow manages to score 550% better? Please explain.
  • madseven7 - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Seems like Anandtech is becoming PCPerspective.
  • GreenReaper - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    Well, it *is* an X-series. Perhaps it has a bit more cache? Or AVX-512 support with more modules? But I also see it's using a BIOS from March 2018 - not the latest from June 6 with microcode allowing MDS mitigations to be used by the OS (see my comment in the previous page).
  • mattkiss - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    There are multiple errors in the "X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody" section. Check the second paragraph and "AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison" table that follows it.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    Could you please be more specific? I'm thumbing through the specs right now, and I'm not seeing an issue.
  • Maxiking - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link

    So any plans to cover the huge fraud and misleading AMD marketing about frequency and the boost frequency? The majority of 3900x have such poor silicon quality they can't reach 4.6 GHz on a single core.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now