Floating Point

The key highlight improvement for floating point performance is full AVX2 support. AMD has increased the execution unit width from 128-bit to 256-bit, allowing for single-cycle AVX2 calculations, rather than cracking the calculation into two instructions and two cycles. This is enhanced by giving 256-bit loads and stores, so the FMA units can be continuously fed. AMD states that due to its energy aware scheduling, there is no predefined frequency drop when using AVX2 instructions (however frequency may be reduced dependent on temperature and voltage requirements, but that’s automatic regardless of instructions used)

In the floating point unit, the queues accept up to four micro-ops per cycle from the dispatch unit which feed into a 160-entry physical register file. This moves into four execution units, which can be fed with 256b data in the load and store mechanism.

Other tweaks have been made to the FMA units than beyond doubling the size – AMD states that they have increased raw performance in memory allocations, for repetitive physics calculations, and certain audio processing techniques.

Another key update is decreasing the FP multiplication latency from 4 cycles to 3 cycles. That is quite a significant improvement. AMD has stated that it is keeping a lot of the detail under wraps, as it wants to present it at Hot Chips is August. We’ll be running a full instruction analysis for our reviews on July 7th.

Decode Integer Units, Load and Store
Comments Locked

216 Comments

View All Comments

  • Thunder 57 - Sunday, June 16, 2019 - link

    It appears they traded half the L1 instruction cache to double the uop cache. They doubled the associativity to keep the same hit rate but it will hold fewer instructions. However, the micro-op cache holds already decoded instructions and if there is a hit there it saves a few stages in the pipeline for decoding, which saves power and increases performance.
  • phoenix_rizzen - Tuesday, June 11, 2019 - link

    From the article:
    "Zen 2 will offer greater than a >1.25x performance gain at the same power,"

    I don't think that means what you meant. :) 1.25x gain would be 225% or over 2x the performance. I think you meant either:

    "Zen 2 will offer greater than a 25% performance gain at the same power,"

    or maybe:

    "Zen 2 will offer greater than 125% performance at the same power,"

    or possibly:

    "Zen 2 will offer greater than 1.25x performance at the same power,"
  • phoenix_rizzen - Tuesday, June 11, 2019 - link

    From the article:
    "With Matisse staying in the AM4 socket, and Rome in the EPYC socket,"

    The server socket name is SP3, not EPYC, so this should read:

    "With Matisse staying in the AM4 socket, and Rome in the SP3 socket,"
  • phoenix_rizzen - Tuesday, June 11, 2019 - link

    From the article:
    "This also becomes somewhat complicated for single core chiplet and dual core chiplet processors,"

    core is superfluous here. The chiplets are up to 8-core. You probably mean "single chiplet and dual chiplet processors".
  • scineram - Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - link

    No, becausethere is no single chiplet. It is the core chiplet that is either 1 or 2 in number.
  • phoenix_rizzen - Tuesday, June 11, 2019 - link

    From the article:
    "all of this also needs to be taken into consideration as provide the optimal path for signaling"

    "as" should be "to"
  • thesavvymage - Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - link

    A 1.25x gain is the exact same as a 25% performance gain, it doesnt meant 225% as you stated
  • dsplover - Tuesday, June 11, 2019 - link

    So in other words Anadtech no longer receives engineering samples but tells us what everyone else is saying.
    Still love coming here as reviews are good, but boy oh boy yuze guys sure slipped down the ladder.

    Bring back Anand Shimpli.
  • Korguz - Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - link

    the do still get engineering samples... but usually cpus...

    not likely.. hes working for apple now....
  • coburn_c - Wednesday, June 12, 2019 - link

    What the heck is UEFI CPPC2?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now