Originally planned to enter mass production in the second half of 2016, Intel’s 10 nm process technology is still barely used by the company today. Currently the process is used to produce just a handful of CPUs, ahead of an expected ramp to high-volume manufacturing (HVM) only later in 2019. Without a doubt, Intel suffered delays on its 10 nm process by several years, significantly impacting the company's product lineup and its business.

Now, as it turns out, Intel’s 10 nm may be a short-living node as the company’s 7 nm tech is on-track for introduction in accordance with its original schedule.

For a number of times Intel said that it set too aggressive scaling/transistor density targets for its 10 nm fabrication process, which is why its development ran into problems. Intel’s 10 nm manufacturing tech relies exclusively on deep ultraviolet lithography (DUVL) with lasers operating on a 193 nm wavelength. To enable the fine feature sizes that Intel set out to achieve on 10 nm, the process had to make heavy usage of mutli-patterning. According to Intel, a problem of the process was precisely its heavy usage of multipatterning (quad-patterning to be more exact).

By contrast, Intel’s 7 nm production tech will use extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL) with laser wavelength of 13.5 nm for select layers, reducing use of multipatterning for certain metal layers and therefore simplifying production and shortening cycle times. As it appears, the 7 nm fabrication process had been in development separately from the 10 nm tech and by a different team. As a result, its development is well underway and is projected to enter HVM in accordance with Intel’s unannounced roadmap, the company says.

Murthy Renduchintala, chief engineering officer and president of technology, systems architecture and client group at Intel is quoted to have said at the Nasdaq's 39th Investor Conference:

“7 nm for us is a separate team and largely a separate effort. We are quite pleased with our progress on 7 nm. In fact, very pleased with our progress on 7 nm. I think that we have taken a lot of lessons out of the 10 nm experience as we defined that and defined a different optimization point between transistor density, power and performance and schedule predictability. […] So, we are very, very focused on getting 7 nm out according to our original internal plans.”

The Intel exec reaffirmed the company plans to start HVM production of client CPUs using its 10 nm process technology in 2019, with datacenter products following on a bit later. That said, Intel is clearly not skipping any of its already announced 10 nm products, but implies that its 7 nm products may hit the market earlier than we might expect today (i.e., four years after the 10 nm).

“One thing I will say is that as you look at 7 nm, for us this is really now a point in time where we will get EUV back into the manufacturing matrix, and therefore, I think, that will give us a degree of back to the traditional Moore’s Law cadence that we were really talking about,”

“[With 7 nm] we are going back to more like a 2X scaling factor […] and then really moving forward with that goal.”

Intel has never disclosed characteristics of its 7 nm fabrication tech, but a major reduction of multi-patterning usage as well as a more traditional 2X scaling goal vs. 10 nm indicates a more extensive usage of EUVL.

According to ASML, one EUV layer requires one EUV step-and-scan system for every ~45,000 wafer starts per month. Therefore, if Intel plans to use EUVL extensively for 10 to 20 layers, it will require approximately 20 to 40 EUVL scanners for a fab with a 100,000 wafer starts per month capacity. Considering that Intel is not the only company with plans to use EUVL in the 2020s, getting the number of EUVL scanners it might need for HVM at multiple fabs may be a challenge.

Meanwhile, so far Intel has announced plans for only one 7 nm fab: the Fab 42 in Arizona. In addition, the company is going to have some 7 nm-capable capacity at its D1 facility used for development and trials (among other things).

Related Reading:

Sources: Intel, SeekingAlpha

POST A COMMENT

79 Comments

View All Comments

  • UkeNeverSeme - Thursday, December 06, 2018 - link

    Hrmm this seems like those rumors about 10nm being canceled weren't entirely off after all. Also they will need to more than just catch up in process technology to beat AMD, since they're behind on architecture as well. Intel needs chiplets AS WELL as to get back on track with their process to beat AMD. Otherwise they will be stuck being "better for gamers", and since the money is in the data centre.... well that will suck. Reply
  • HStewart - Thursday, December 06, 2018 - link

    I think Intel will disclose more information on Dec 11th. It should be interesting. Reply
  • RobinsonUK - Thursday, December 06, 2018 - link

    Is Intel a big Anandtech advertiser or something? Why would you post this blatant attempt to spread uncertainty? Publishing Intel press releases now? Put "sponsored" at the top. You state Intel is "on track" but then don't say when they estimate its arrival. This leads me to believe they haven't got the first clue, which means it's going to be years. Reply
  • stephenbrooks - Thursday, December 06, 2018 - link

    They are using EUV for --> 10-20 layers. <-- This is what I find most interesting about this announcement: they plan to do what appears to be a full conversion to EUV where other companies have proposed only converting a few of the smallest layers. Reply
  • Valantar - Friday, December 07, 2018 - link

    A question: is ASML the _only_ company making step-and-scan machines for high-end chip production? If so, why on earth have they been allowed to monopolize this market, and why hasn't anyone stepped up to compete with them? I get that making machines like this is ridiculously complicated, but if the main reason is "ASML holds all the patents", it's about time that the relevant trade regulation body steps in and creates some room for competition in this space. It's clearly needed. Reply
  • jjj - Friday, December 07, 2018 - link

    lol spinning non-news into good news.
    There was never an assumption that 7nm is delayed, that Intel doesn't practically skip first gen 10nm.
    7nm is 2021 soonest , nothing new, nothing unexpected and they likely get some delays to push it to 2022 soonest. The big question is if they use FF or GAA as other might leave FF behind by then.
    Reply
  • pogostick - Friday, December 07, 2018 - link

    These comments.... I can't believe after all of these years how many people still take Intel talking points at face value. Reply
  • Opencg - Sunday, December 09, 2018 - link

    Rumor that 10nm is completely scrapped continues to gain traction Reply
  • eastcoast_pete - Monday, December 10, 2018 - link

    I actually hope that Intel does get their EUV going with good yields - open and honest competition is good for all of us.
    I also have my own theory why Intel is so behind its own schedule with 10 nm and following: you see, as Intel moves almost at light speed, their clocks run slower due to time dilation (: At least, that's one excuse they haven't tried, yet.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now