Precision Boost 2

Exact per-core turbo timings for the new processors will be determined by AMD’s voltage-frequency scaling functionality through Precision Boost 2. This feature, which we covered extensively in our Ryzen 7 2700X review, relies on available power and current to determine frequency, rather than a discrete look-up-table for voltage and frequency based on loading. Depending on the system default capabilities, the frequency and voltage will dynamically shift in order to use more of the power budget available at any point in the processor loading.

The idea is that the processor can use more of the power budget available to it than a fixed look up table that has to be consistent between all SKUs that are stamped with that number.

Precision Boost 2 also works in conjunction with XFR2 (eXtreme Frequency Range) which reacts to additional thermal headroom. If there is additional thermal budget, driven by a top-line cooler, then the processor is enabled to use more power up to the thermal limit and get additional frequency. AMD claims that a good cooler in a low ambient situation can compute >10% better in selected tests as a result of XFR2.

Ultimately this makes testing Threadripper 2 somewhat difficult. With a turbo table, performance is fixed between the different performance characteristics of each bit of silicon, making power the only differentiator. With PB2 and XF2, no two processors will perform the same. AMD has also hit a bit of a snag with these features, choosing to launch Threadripper 2 during the middle of a heatwave in Europe. Europe is famed for its lack of air conditioning everywhere, and when the ambient temperature is going above 30ºC, this will limit additional performance gains. It means that a review from a Nordic publication might see better results than one from the tropics, quite substantially.

Luckily for us we tested most of our benchmarks while in an air conditioned hotel thanks to Intel’s Data-Centric Innovation Summit which was the week before launch.

Precision Boost Overdrive

The new processors also support a feature called Precision Boost Overdrive, which looks at three key areas for power, thermal design current, and electrical design current. If any of these three areas has additional headroom, then the system will attempt to raise both the frequency and the voltage for increased performance. PBO is a mix of ‘standard’ overclocking, giving an all core boost, but gives a single core frequency uplift along with the support to still keep Precision Boost trying to raise frequency in middle-sized workloads, which is typically lost with a standard overclock. PBO also allows for idle power saving with a standard performance. PBO is enabled through Ryzen Master.

The three key areas are defined by AMD as follows:

  • Package (CPU) Power, or PPT: Allowed socket power consumption permitted across the voltage rails supplying the socket
  • Thermal Design Current, or TDC: The maximum current that can be delivered by the motherboard voltage regulator after warming to a steady-state temperature
  • Electrical Design Current, or EDC: The maximum current that can be delivered by the motherboard voltage regulator in a peak/spike condition

By extending these limits, PBO gives rise for PB2 to have more headroom, letting PB2 push the system harder and further. PBO is quoted by AMD as supplying up to +16% performance beyond the standard.

AMD also clarifies that PBO is pushing the processor beyond the rated specifications and is an overclock: and thus any damage incurred will not be protected by warranty

StoreMI

Also available with the new Ryzen Threadripper 2 processors is StoreMI, AMD’s solution to caching by offering configurable tiered storage for users that want to mix DRAM, SSD, and HDD storage into a single unified platform. The software implementation dynamically adjusts data between up to 2GB of DRAM, up to 256 GB of SSD (NVMe or SATA), and a spinning hard drive to afford the best reading and writing experience when there isn’t enough fast storage.

AMD initially offered this software as a $20 add-on to the Ryzen APU platform, then it became free (up to a 256GB SSD) for the Ryzen 2000-series processors. That offer now extends to Threadripper. AMD’s best case scenario is citing a 90% improvement in loading times.

Core to Core to Core: Design Trade Offs Feed Me: Infinity Fabric Requires More Power
Comments Locked

171 Comments

View All Comments

  • sjoukew - Thursday, August 16, 2018 - link

    There is also an article which shows the difference in performance on windows vs linux for the Threadripper processors. It is amazing to see. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&...
  • ishould - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    TLDR; Unless you have a very specific need for 32 cores/2990WX, the 2950x is faster and cheaper than the former, even during tasks that traditionally scale well with cores. This is looking to be a good differentiator between Zen+ EPYC and 2990WX. Definitely looking forward to Zen+ EPYC tests!
  • Silma - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    "... it makes perfect sense for a narrow set of workloads where it toasts the competition."

    Can you please list those workloads?

    When would it make sense to purchase a Threadripper PC vs many 'normal processors' PCs for tasks that you can easily handle in parallel?
  • Aephe - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    For example people like me who use their computers for 3D rendering for one. (again: those Corona scores!) The more cores (and Ghz) + ram, the better!
  • jospoortvliet - Saturday, August 18, 2018 - link

    And linux/Unix use, like C++ or Rust developer. Or heavy vm user. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&...
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    I'm so glad the competition is back! its been stagnant for years now (at about 4 cores) with Intel dominating the market. For home labs/servers, this is great news! more cores for less without having to go the Xeon ES routes. :)
  • j1ceasar@yahoo.com - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    Can some one tell me who needs these, i don't as a normal consumer
  • cheshirster - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    "tell me who needs these"
    As a normal customer you don't need to know this.
  • Gothmoth - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    sorry but this handbrake numbers look wrong. no other website i have visited has seen such big differences.
  • twtech - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    I really would like to see some code compile benchmarks. Next to rendering and other graphic content related tasks, compiling code in large codebases is probably the 2nd most common use-case someone would consider buying a processor like this for, and it seems like there is a dearth of coverage for it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now