ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate Conclusion

The ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate’s focus is primarily on performance users with plenty of premium and high-end features to satisfy gamers too. This ATX sized flagship model from ASRock does have a lot of bells and whistles, but not the kind you would expect with the usual red and black themed gaming targeted model. Instead this is one that has one eye on trying to look as if it has style, whilst still appealing to what I like to call 'the RGB generation'.

The performance was generally average and consistent with previous testing, with the biggest positive showing come through system POST times and within our Handbrake video conversion benchmark. Everything else appeared to be consistent, with the exception of some rather questionable results garnered in our Ashes of the Singularity and Total War game testing; the same kind of results we found in our GIGABYTE X470 Gaming 7 Wi-Fi review. It’s not quite as bad as the figures yielded in gaming may suggest, and could perhaps be attributed to firmware infancy. DPC latency testing did prove rather positive and the audio performance displayed in our RMAA testing achieved the expected results. ASRock’s decision to omit any form of EMI shielding and any noticeable audio PCB separation may not give the impression audio is one of their key areas, but these features can sometimes be overemphasized by manufacturers as being a vastly superior when good quality component choice and circuitry play a more important role on overall performance.

The power delivery of the motherboard is overkill for most users. This likely contributed to our overclocking performance, with our Ryzen 7 1700 sample hitting 4.0 GHz, going beyond the 3.9 GHz mark we've been able to achieve on most boards. The X470 Taichi Ultimate displays a good showing on the overclocking front and it would be easy to see why an extreme overclocker may opt to go for this board over other offerings. The board also has an external clock generator for allowing adjustments to the baseclock frequency. An additional 4-pin 12 V CPU power input in addition to the standard 8-pin is also desirable as it allows the CPU to pull additional power at maximum load and frequencies when required.


The ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate paired with the Cooler Master Master Liquid ML240R AIO RGB Cooler

For $300, the inclusion of an Aquantia AQC107 10Gb/s LAN port in addition to a secondary Gigabit LAN port powered by the Intel I211-AT controller adds an element of premium quality to what could be mistaken for its little brother, the X470 Taichi; aside from slight aesthetic adjustments to the heatsinks and covers. Another premium feature included are the Realtek ALC 1220 audio codec which can be configured through the included useful, yet primitive and basic looking Realtek HD Audio Manager.

While the ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate has everything a top board should, it’s essentially the regular X470 Taichi with 10G Ethernet and on-board power and reset switches, which on the regular X470 Taichi, the circuitry can actually still be seen so it does feel like these two boards share the same PCB, but with minor differences and inclusions. Does the extra $70 signify the cost between the two boards? If the user is wanting to utilize the 10G LAN port then the price can be justified, but if that's not the case, the $70 saved on the regular X470 Taichi could allow for more budget to be allocated elsewhere, such as system memory which does scale pretty well with the Zen architecture, or a higher capacity SSD. 

The ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate has a beautifully unique look with oodles of Polychrome RGB capabilities for a glorified light show and has decent performance to back it up. However if the Aquantia 10G LAN isn't a feature that's going to be taken advantage of, the $70 cheaper, going for the ASRock X470 Taichi could well and truly be the difference between opting for the better Ryzen 7 2700 ($299) over the Ryzen 5 2600X ($229) .

Other AnandTech Ryzen Coverage

Ryzen Overclocking
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • AdrianB1 - Friday, August 3, 2018 - link

    The implementation can be very different, if only 1 or 2 PCIe 2.0 lanes are linked to the chip the performance is not a known quantity. We know the max speed of the chipset, we don't know how it was implemented on this expensive motherboard.Would you bet your money on a good implementation?
  • Amoro - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Why is there such a noticeable performance delta? Is that B350 Tomahawk doing some weird overclocking?
  • 4everalone - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    That's a whole lot of work you guys did and I don't mean to discount it in anyway. But it makes me wonder, isn't the point of going for x470 instead of the x370 to take better advantage of what the new processors have to offer? So why go through this full blown review using an older processor? Was the 2700x unavailable at the time you started with this?
  • 29a - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    They used an odd assortment of games too.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    games need to be fully scriptable via commandline for automated data collection, which eliminates a number of otherwise popular games. The gamelist itself is updated about once/year (looks like still v2017), but needs to keep a decent fraction of last years list to allow some comparison between new and old reviews.
  • Ratman6161 - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    I suspect the reason is that if they used a 2xxx CPU to test the x470 and B450 boards then they would have to re-test all the x370 and B350 boards in order to make all the tests comparable.
  • pixelstuff - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    I'm glad to see another motherboard with a 10G NIC, but I'd really like to the new 2.5G protocol start showing up on everything. Surely that can work in situations where the 10G would be to hot.
  • JlHADJOE - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Dude, you can't just put "Aquantia 10GbE on Ryzen" in the headline and do zero network testing. This review is a total bait and switch!
  • Flappergast - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Please explain why this new top Board is doing 47.8 FPS while the old budget board msi b350 is doing 52.5 FPS in Ashes?
  • WasHopingForAnHonestReview - Friday, August 3, 2018 - link

    This concerns me. That alone is keeping me from buying one.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now