YouTube Streaming

Our HTPC testing with respect to YouTube has been restricted to playback of a 1080p music video using the native HTML5 player in Firefox. However, the shift to 4K and the necessity to evaluate HDR support have made us choose Mystery Box's Peru 8K HDR 60FPS video as our test sample moving forward.

The TCL 55P607's Roku platform has a YouTube app. Our sample stream played back the 4Kp60 HDR version encoded in VP9 Profile 2 along with AAC audio.

4K YouTube HDR on the TCL 55P607

The NVIDIA SATV also has a YouTube app. However, accessing the sample clip resulted in the fetching of the 4Kp60 VP9 version without HDR. Further research revealed that the Tegra K1 X1 SoC in the SATV does not support VP9 Profile 2. Google's refusal to use HEVC for the HDR videos on YouTube mean that SATV owners can forget about HDR in YouTube streams.

4K YouTube on the NVIDIA SHIELD Android TV

On the PC front, the KBL-U systems support VP9 Profile 2 decoding. Using the recommended browser (Microsoft Edge) allows us to play back the HDR stream after putting the desktop in HDR mode.

4K YouTube HDR on the ASRock Beebox-S 7200U using Microsoft Edge

The Zotac EN1080K, however, does not have VP9 Profile 2 hardware decoding. Our sample clip played back the 4Kp60 VP9 version without HDR even with the desktop set to HDR mode and streaming HDR videos enabled.

4K YouTube on the Zotac ZBOX MAGNUS EN1080K using Microsoft Edge

We also tracked the power consumption (using a Ubiquiti Networks mPower Pro) of the various playback devices while streaming the YouTube sample clip.

YouTube Streaming - Power Consumption

The Roku power numbers also include the display itself. So, it is not really fair to compare it against that of the other players. Disregarding the Roku data, we find that the ASRock Beebox-S 7200U is the most power-efficient of the lot with respect to YouTube streaming. If the display power consumption were to be considered in addition, it is likely that the Roku would emerge as the winner.

HDR Support Netflix Streaming
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • soper8 - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    I would also agree that some AV forums have a more robust inventory of options but if sites like Anandtech others don't bring more into the fold of HTPC the community had less opportunity to grow.

    On the term "budget" used in the article: I think there some perspective on what could be spent on a HTPC setup vs the relative low cost of this setup.

    My setup...

    Server:
    HP DL380 Gen 7 8 core 128gb ram
    40TB+ RAID6 storage (72 TB raw)
    Runs Windows 2012 R2 with Emby, Plex, Kodi backends
    Provides iSCSI drive support for client recording

    "TV" clients
    1 Intel NUC 5ppyh
    1 Zotac CI325
    1 home built i5 4560T mini itx
    1 home built i7 2600k atx
    all have 8gb ram, 250ish SSD, Windows 7 or 8.1
    last two have blue ray and amd discrete video
    (I haven't jumped to 4k so I will have to swap out video cards on those two.)

    Streamers
    Microsoft wireless video adapters on all screens (supports windows, mac, and android)

    TV tuners
    Centon infinity 6 for cable card
    HDHomerun Prime OTA

    My point to basic/budget is all in the eye of the beholder and I haven't even listed tvs, amplifiers, tuners, etc.
  • we - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    Retailers in the UK advertize the RRP of the Denon AVR-X2400H as £499, and it is easily obtainable at various retailers for £399, which is budget territory. How is it possible that the same product has a RRP of $999 in the US (according to the article)??
  • we - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    My mistake (ist a X3400H, not X2400H). Apologies.
  • thestryker - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    I do think that this article does fulfill the goal of explaining the current state of htpc and giving options. I'd like to think people are capable of reading the conclusion setting forth several option, but given a lot of the comments that doesn't seem to be the case.

    No matter how average the playback may be not mentioning the xbox one s/x as playback options is a missed opportunity as they're both cheaper than htpc for uhd blu-ray.

    For many years I've had a pc connected to my tv for playback, but now I've switched to using the plex tv app on the tv and xbox one s for blu-ray playback. The draconian approach to drm drove me away from the htpc and I don't see that changing. Most good 4k tvs have netflix/amazon built in and many have hulu support. There's really not much to be gained by using a htpc anymore unless you have very specific needs.
  • darckhart - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    I think this article was fine; it provides a starting point. HTPC crowd is far too opinionated to ever have consensus on "budget" and certain requirements (whether video or audio) preclude "budget." To do a comprehensive selection and review would be ridiculous. This article was, if you have a TV that supports X, and you want audio that supports Y, and you want to have a PC in there, here's a rough setup and the limits of it.

    That being said, this article convinced me that the htpc space for video is definitely not "it just works" and it seems like they're making it difficult because no one cares to play well with each other. This leaves the consumer having to juggle every piece of equipment and make sure they're updated for this or that.
  • Golgatha777 - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    Even dedicated AV equipment is getting really bad as of late. Does it support Dolby Atmos and Vision, is it HDCP 2.2 compliant, what about when HDMI 2.1 comes around, does it support all HDR standards, will it have a firmware update for any of the aforementioned and at what date, etc.?
  • Kevin G - Wednesday, December 27, 2017 - link

    The HTCP market is in a bit of shock as 'standards' have been rather fluid of late, something you never want a true standard to be.

    HDMI and HDCP are the two big factors as to why things have been so dynamic. The transition from HDMI 1.4 to HDMI 2.0 went rather well from a high level stand point and everything nowadays has going to pure HDMI 2.0 (there are still a few pieces of electronics that mix HDMI 2.0 and HDMI 1.4 ports). The complicating factor is that HDCP versions haven't been tied down to HDMI versions. So a HDMI 1.4 port could support HDCP 1.4 or HDCP 2.0. Similarly HDMI 2.0 can have either HDCP 2.0 or HDCP 2.2 support. Right now the coming HDMI 2.1 equipment is based around HDCP 2.2 but I fathom there will soon be a new version of HDCP announced for 8K content making the first wave of HDMI 2.1 gear useless outside of a glorified PC displays.

    On the PC side of things, that requires OS updates to support the new versions of copy protections and hardware to enable it too. There appears to be active disdain by media companies to actually permit 4K disc playback on PC's, hence why it has such a long chain of requirements.
  • Reflex - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    Ganesh -

    There is literally no way you could have wrote this that would have satisfied even half the home theater crowd. That entire space is full of opinions. I didn't really agree with your decisions either, but I don't have to because you aren't really telling anyone what to buy, you are documenting what you built and providing it for others who may wish to have a good starting point. And that is all you needed to do.

    My own setup was recently rebuilt. I finally ditched the receiver concept and went with a soundbar.

    LG OLED65B7A: $2049 via Amazon as a certified refurb (Beach Camera is reboxing non-refurbs to avoid the MSRP)
    Samsung HW-K950 Sound Bar (open box special from an Amazon reseller, $760)
    Awake Lion 5 port HDMI2/HDCP2.2 switch ($50)

    Connected to that I have a FireTV, Xbox One S, a SteamLink (wish they'd do a 4k version) and a few older devices as well. It all works, including HDR and Dolby Atmos from devices that support it. By watching for open box or refurb marked items I saved around a grand from the price and this should last me for a long time. I do not miss the receiver, the sound bar I chose is the top rated in the space and has actual back channels and separate sub, it is fantastic with Atmos content. Plus my wiring is much simpler.

    TV: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B074QQZ9VJ
    Soundbar: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01I0HW12O
    HDMI Switch: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06WV5YJ6H
    Legacy device Switch: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B072F6XJHL
    Network Switch: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01AX8XHRQ

    Total devices connected -

    Xbox One S
    Xbox 360
    Xbox
    Amazon FireTV2
    SteamLink (connected to a gaming PC somewhere where I don't have to hear it)
    Dreamcast
  • Golgatha777 - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    For my own setup:

    $200 - XBox One S - Use it for all optical media and streaming. Supports HDR10, bitstream output of Dolby Atmos, and HDMI 2.0 for 4k@60Hz. It handles all my optical disc and Internet streaming needs.

    $1000 (video card is $500 of it) - HTPC - has a GTX 1080, i7 3770k from an old build, and 16GB DDR3 memory. Plays back media files and ISO rips from a home server very nicely with 7.1 surround sound support built into the OS. I call this good enough for the convenience factor because setting up Dolby Atmos has proven to be a nightmare on Windows 10 so far.

    $1200 - My receiver is a Yamaha RXA-3060 9.2 channel hooked up in a 7.1.2 configuration with HDCP 2.2 and HDMI 2.0a on all ports. It also supports HDR10 and BT.2020 out of the box. For the money, I figure this is about as future proofed as I can get on a receiver. I can also turn the last dot 2 (7.1.(2)) into a 7.1 and stereo set of speakers for a 2nd zone on the back, outdoor patio.

    $1400 - LG 55EG9100 1080p TV - I'll worry about 4k discs once the powers that be sort out the standards for HDR, or all TVs start supporting both HDR10 and Dolby Vision (and the XBox One S gets Dolby Vision support); until then, so sale. For now, I'll buy a handful of 4k Bluray discs since I know I'll upgrade at some point, and I can enjoy the Dolby Atmos soundtracks now.
  • fallaha56 - Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - link

    Sorry but very poor advice here(!)

    A good AV receiver lasts more than 4(!) years and here you are recommending someone buy one just as it becomes obsolete

    HDMI 2.1 is future-proof for years, 2.0 is about to flop with HDR

    Did you also say that Denon were sponsoring this article?!?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now