ASRock Rack EPYCD8-2T Conclusion

Professional grade motherboards are a completely different playing field when it comes to the consumer-focused models. The main differences aside from featuring much plainer and archaic aesthetics, come via the onboard controller set. This includes the use of BMC controllers to allow users to connect for vital maintenance and monitoring from distant locations. ASRock Rack has been around since 2013 and until 2018, it produced models for Intel. The first board created for AMD';s EPYC from ASRock Rack was the EPYCD8, with the primary difference between that and the EPYCD8-2T coming through its choice of primary networking controller. The newer EPYCD8-2T includes an Intel X550 Dual 10 G Ethernet controller which adds two ports on the rear. Everything else between both models remains unchanged.

The ASRock EPYCD8-2T includes seven PCIe 3.0 slots, which is an is an impressive feat given the board is ATX. They run in a x16/x8/x16/x8/x16/x8/x16 configuration, with the four full-length slots running at the full x16 bandwidth, and the half-length slots running at x8. One of the biggest benefits of AMD's EPYC is that each processor has 128 available PCIe lanes, which the ASRock model takes full advantage of. Also benefiting from the PCIe capability is two PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slots, with two Oculink slots for U.2 drives, with support for up to nine SATA devices via two mini SAS HD ports, with a single SATA DOM powered connector. 


The ASRock EPYCD8-2T has seven PCIe 3.0 slots

To connect remotely to a system using this model, users can access it over a network using a Realtek RTL8211E Gigabit Ethernet port designed for the boards IPMI. The Aspeed AST2500 BMC adds a D-sub 2D video output on the rear panel which allows users to run without a graphics card installed. The management interface itself is very well-rounded with a clean GUI and offers plenty of server-level functions. The memory support includes eight slots which support up to DDR4-3200 of RDIMM and LRDIMM ECC memory and a maximum capacity of up to 1 TB.

Looking at the performance, and the EPYCD8-2T is very competitive from a computational standpoint. The real difference came in our power consumption testing which puts it as the more power-efficient model when compared directly to the GIGABYTE model. Another highly positive result came in our DPC latency testing, with the lowest latency achieved from any model tested over the last few years. This makes the EPYCD8-2T very suitable for an audio workstation, despite not including any onboard audio; audio producers generally use much higher grade audio equipment anyway. Results in our POST time testing were also favourable with the ASRock board booting into Windows around 20 seconds quicker than the GIGABYTE counterpart.

 

Bigger sized boards such as E-ATX models can cram more memory slots on, but the EPYCD8-2T is 'ahead' of its size in terms of specifications with its great storage capability spearheaded by dual PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slots, and support for up to nine SATA drives. The ASRock EPYCD8-2T retails for $498 with dual 10 G Ethernet, or alternatively users satisfied with dual Gigabit Ethernet can save some budget with the EYPCD8 ($460) coming in at around $40 cheaper. For comparative purposes, the larger E-ATX sized GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0 which we previously reviewed retails for $565, had more memory slots (16 versus 8) and offering up to 2 TB. Being ATX means the ASRock EPYCD8-2T is compatible with more chassis types, including 1U chassis, and conventional desktop cases.

Overall the ASRock Rack EPYCD8-2T is a solid single-socket EPYC solution for users not interested in PCIe 4.0 but still want plenty of PCIe and storage availability in a single socket ATX form factor.

CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • romrunning - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    Would it be possible to get a review of more recent AMD server boards from ASRockRack, like the ROMED8HM3 (SP3 socket, supports EPYC Rome, has many PCIe 4.0 slots)?
  • Slash3 - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    The ASRock Rack ROMED8-2T is a similarly near perfect board for the current Epyc CPUs; I'd love to see some reviews once it hits retail channels (within a few weeks, hopefully).

    https://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.a...
  • cygnus1 - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    I plan to build a new home server before the end of the year so I went and checked that one out. I do want it to be AMD, and not really caring if it's Epyc or Ryzen, just need to find a good board with IPMI like these AsrockRack ones. The only problem I see for me with the ROMED8-2T is no x16 slots and the x8 slots are all closed ended for some reason, so you can't even put an x16 card in them.
  • brucethemoose - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    All 7 slots on the ROMED8-2T are x16.

    https://www.asrockrack.com/photo/ROMED8-2T-1(M).jp...
  • Foeketijn - Tuesday, April 21, 2020 - link

    Not sure what the requirements are, but I can endorse the Asrockrack X470 boards. Ryzens Zen2 and the x470 make a really efficient powerhouse (just 100 Watts for a 8 core in a noisy but cool 1u server doing stress testing)
  • romrunning - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    Or the ROMED8-2T or ROMED8QM-2T? Really, I guess any of the newer "ROME" models that ASRockRack has listed. These newer boards would be more relevant than the older EPYCD8-2T, of which the ROMED8-2T seems like it's the direct successor.
  • Mr Perfect - Tuesday, April 21, 2020 - link

    Yes, please review Epyc boards with PCIe 4. There are several in this price range that have it, so it's not really beneficial to look at boards of the same cost that have half the IO bandwidth.

    Tyan's S8030GM4NE-2T has five x16 4.0 slots and the two 10gb Ethernet ports. I'd love to know if that board was any good.
  • shabby - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    Only two 10g ports? Come on where are my 100g ports...
  • vladpetric - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    100g is not something that a CPU-based system can saturate. High end switches, aggregating traffic from multiple end points - sure. Software running on a CPU - no.
  • eastcoast_pete - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    I don't think that question was asked in earnest. However, if it was, I agree with you.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now