Sequential Read Performance

Our first test of sequential read performance uses short bursts of 128MB, issued as 128kB operations with no queuing. The test averages performance across eight bursts for a total of 1GB of data transferred from a drive containing 16GB of data. Between each burst the drive is given enough idle time to keep the overall duty cycle at 20%.

Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Orange is for the new drives, Blue is for the previous generation models

The burst sequential read speeds of almost all of these SATA drives are essentially equivalent; the slightly lower scores from the new WD and SanDisk drives are not a meaningful drop from the previous generation.

Our test of sustained sequential reads uses queue depths from 1 to 32, with the performance and power scores computed as the average of QD1, QD2 and QD4. Each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB transferred, from a drive containing 64GB of data.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read

On the longer test of sequential reads, the WD Blue 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D end up in the second tier of SSDs, tied with the Intel 545s and Toshiba's MLC-based OCZ VX500, but Samsung's 850 PRO and 850 EVO still have a substantial performance advantage.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)

The power efficiency of the WD Blue 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D is excellent, trailing behind only the MLC-based OCZ VX500 that also uses a reduced amount of external DRAM. The previous generation of SanDisk and WD drives had the same power efficiency as Samsung's 850 PRO and EVO, which was good by last year's standards.

From QD1 to QD2, the WD Blue 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D see a slight improvement in sequential read performance and don't benefit any further from higher queue depths. The Samsung 850 PRO and 850 EVO both show a much larger jump in performance from QD1 to QD2, leading to a higher steady-state sequential read speed. The OCZ VX500 can actually match the Samsung drives at high queue depths, but it doesn't saturate until QD4.

Sequential Write Performance

Our test of sequential write burst performance is structured identically to the sequential read burst performance test save for the direction of the data transfer. Each burst writes 128MB as 128kB operations issued at QD1, for a total of 1GB of data written to a drive containing 16GB of data.

Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)

As with sequential reads, the burst sequential write speed of the new WD and SanDisk drives is slightly reduced from the preceding generation, but the performance isn't low enough to make the new drives stand out from the crowd.

Our test of sustained sequential writes is structured identically to our sustained sequential read test, save for the direction of the data transfers. Queue depths range from 1 to 32 and each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB, followed by up to one minute of idle time for the drive to cool off and perform garbage collection. The test is confined to a 64GB span of the drive.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write

The performance of the WD Blue 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D on the longer sequential write test is much improved from the previous generation of drives, but still rather slow compared to the competition.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)

With a substantial performance boost, the power efficiency of the latest WD/SanDisk SSDs is now about average, and is competitive with Samsung's drives but far lower than what the Crucial MX300 or OCZ VX500 offer.

The mediocre sustained sequential write performance of the new WD/SanDisk 3D NAND SSDs is due to a combination of relatively low performance once the drive has reached its full performance, and a slow ramp up that is still not quite at full speed by QD4. Most drives are operating at or very near their full performance at QD2.

Random Performance Mixed Read/Write Performance
POST A COMMENT

52 Comments

View All Comments

  • MajGenRelativity - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Looks like a good drive to keep in mind. Congratulations to WD and SanDisk on making a product worthy of challenging the 850 Evo. Good to see the rest of the market FINALLY catching up! Reply
  • nathanddrews - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Knowing that SATA is just about completely tapped at this point, it would just be nice if we could get these drives down to the $0.10/GB range. Reply
  • MajGenRelativity - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Unfortunately, that won't happen while we're in the middle of a NAND shortage/price fixing epidemic Reply
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Agreed. I'm hoping that by next year the large scale switch over from planar to 3d nand will be complete and the supply situation will be less squeezed. Reply
  • MajGenRelativity - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Yep. I hope DRAM prices go down too Reply
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Same, although a shortage caused by rising demand is at least a good problem to have after years of the consumer PCs decline dragging the industry down. Reply
  • MajGenRelativity - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    That's true, assuming the "shortage" is caused by rising demand. I have no proof either way, so you quite well could be right. Reply
  • melgross - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    Much of it is coming from increasing smartphone and tablet storage. For example, Apple now has either 64GB or 256GB for their phones, and up to 512GB for the Pro tablets. Those are pretty large numbers, and along with some Android models, are sucking a lot of NAND and RAM out of the market. Reply
  • smilingcrow - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    The demand is coming from other areas not PCs and that's only half of it.
    The other is that they have kept supply low so not to get into the same over supply issue that they have had before.
    The very low RAM prices were unsustainable due to massive losses but not sure if NAND has ever been sold below cost.
    Reply
  • MajGenRelativity - Thursday, September 14, 2017 - link

    Ah Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now