Storage and Networking Performance

Storage and networking are two major aspects which influence our experience with any computing system. This section presents results from our evaluation of these aspects in the ASRock 4X4 BOX-4800U. On the storage side, one option would be repetition of our strenuous SSD review tests on the drive(s) in the PC. Fortunately, to avoid that overkill, PCMark 8 has a storage bench where certain common workloads such as loading games and document processing are replayed on the target drive. Results are presented in two forms, one being a benchmark number and the other, a bandwidth figure. We ran the PCMark 8 storage bench on selected PCs and the results are presented below.

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Score

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Bandwidth

The 1TB Crucial P5 SSD in the Frost Canyon NUC manages to provide higher storage bandwidth compared to the 512GB DRAM-less Patriot P300 in the 4X4 BOX-4800U, but the storage subsystem scores are fairly close to each other.

On the networking side, we restricted ourselves to the evaluation of the WLAN component. Our standard test router is the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120 configured with both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks. The router is placed approximately 11 ft. away with a direct line-of-sight to the PC under test. A wired client (Zotac MI553, with an Akitio T3-10G NBASE-T Thunderbolt 3 adapter) is connected to the 5GbE port of the RAX120 and serves as one endpoint for iperf evaluation.

We first left the 5GHz network at default (meaning, no DFS), and the 4X4 BOX-4800U connected with the following parameters,

A script to run iPerf3 with 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 parallel streams between the 4X4 BOX-4800U and the Zotac ZBOX MI553 was processed - the first set for TX alone, followed by another set for RX, and finally a third set with bidirectional traffic.

The RAX120 can be explicitly configured to connect over a DFS channel. This works in the absence of any radar presence in the vicinity. In such a scenario, the 4X4 BOX-4800U connected with the following parameters,

The iPerf3 script was processed again and delivered the following result.

With DFS support, we can expected around 1.28 Gbps of best-case throughput via the AX200 in the 4X4 BOX-4800U. The table below presents the iPerf3 benchmark results obtained in the above testing scenario.

Wireless Bandwidth - TCP Traffic
(iPerf3 Throughput in Gbps)
Stream
Count
80 MHz Wi-Fi 6 (Non-DFS) 160 MHz Wi-Fi 6 (DFS)
TX RX TX RX
1 0.897 - 1.259 -
2 0.893 - 1.242 -
4 0.868 - 1.286 -
8 0.862 - 1.299 -
16 0.876 - 1.294 -
1 - 0.695 - 0.908
2 - 0.697 - 1.027
4 - 0.698 - 1.154
8 - 0.701 - 1.211
16 - 0.701 - 1.262
1 0.652 0.153 1.183 0.045
2 0.612 0.208 1.020 0.185
4 0.451 0.342 1.089 0.152
8 0.207 0.541 0.940 0.298
16 0.403 0.383 0.815 0.421

The numbers presented above are slightly lesser than the average segment bandwidths noted, as the data in the graph is computed from the network interface's counters, while iPerf reports results based only on the traffic sent by it alone.

Miscellaneous Performance Metrics HTPC Credentials - I
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • watersb - Saturday, December 19, 2020 - link

    Thanks.

    The motherboard looks like PC-104, without the funky stack connector.
  • mars2k - Tuesday, December 1, 2020 - link

    Why no Blu-Ray playback? What do they think we're supposed to do?
  • kapqa - Friday, October 8, 2021 - link

    Thank you, very informative.
    It would have been nice to have the Ethernet Speed&Behavious test included in the Network Capabilities Analysis.
    Looking forward to see some interesting devices yet to come.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now