Xe-LP GPU Performance: World of Tanks

Albeit different to most of the other commonly played MMO or massively multiplayer online games, World of Tanks is set in the mid-20th century and allows players to take control of a range of military based armored vehicles. World of Tanks (WoT) is developed and published by Wargaming who are based in Belarus, with the game’s soundtrack being primarily composed by Belarusian composer Sergey Khmelevsky. The game offers multiple entry points including a free-to-play element as well as allowing players to pay a fee to open up more features. One of the most interesting things about this tank based MMO is that it achieved eSports status when it debuted at the World Cyber Games back in 2012.

World of Tanks enCore is a demo application for its new graphics engine penned by the Wargaming development team. Over time the new core engine has been implemented into the full game upgrading the games visuals with key elements such as improved water, flora, shadows, lighting as well as other objects such as buildings. The World of Tanks enCore demo app not only offers up insight into the impending game engine changes, but allows users to check system performance to see if the new engine runs optimally on their system. There is technically a Ray Tracing version of the enCore benchmark now available, however because it can’t be deployed standalone without the installer, we decided against using it. If that gets fixed, then we can look into it.

World of Tanks: 768p Minimum Quality

WoT is an easy win for Intel.

 

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XV Xe-LP GPU Performance: F1 2019
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Came here to leave an identical comment before I've even read the article 😂
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    The Tiger King puns are getting old.
  • huangcjz - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I still don't get it...
  • Luminar - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    RIP AMD
  • tipoo - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    You haven't had the...Well I can't say pleasure, of watching Tiger King then
  • Flunk - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Wow, this naming scheme is even worse than the previous one. I've been patiently explaining to people for years that the number after the I is less important than that last letter.

    E.G. H > U > Y

    I can't even imagine how you'd explain this to someone who isn't a hardcore enthusiat. You basicallly need to look up each CPU number to know where in the stack it is. Might as well give up on the numbers entirely.
  • wr3zzz - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I am with you but it sounds like the 85 in 1185G7 is the new U.
  • ingwe - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Agree with Ian and Andrei. The power/naming shenanigans are just miserable.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Intel's product naming division is its own circle of hell.
  • CajunArson - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    You guys really REALLY need to update NAMD to the 2.14 nightly builds to get a real idea of what Willow Cove can do in a workload that is very heavily used in HPC: https://www.hpcwire.com/2020/08/12/intel-speeds-na...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now