Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XIV

Despite being one number less than Final Fantasy 15, because FF14 is a massively-multiplayer online title, there are always yearly update packages which give the opportunity for graphical updates too. In 2019, FFXIV launched its Shadowbringers expansion, and an official standalone benchmark was released at the same time for users to understand what level of performance they could expect. Much like the FF15 benchmark we’ve been using for a while, this test is a long 7-minute scene of simulated gameplay within the title. There are a number of interesting graphical features, and it certainly looks more like a 2019 title than a 2010 release, which is when FF14 first came out.

With this being a standalone benchmark, we do not have to worry about updates, and the idea for these sort of tests for end-users is to keep the code base consistent.

Final Fantasy XIV: 768p Minimum QualityFinal Fantasy XIV: 1080p Maximum Quality

This is an easy win for Intel.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Deus Ex Mankind Divided Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • AMDSuperFan - Monday, September 21, 2020 - link

    What really concerns me is this Intel Tiger is built on a 10mm process that looks like it is as good or better than the TSMC 7nm process. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_nm_process. They do not talk about the +++ superfin variants for node density. We need Super Navi to fight against this. We know for laptops or gaming, nobody can touch big navi. Nvidia cannot. It will be much faster I think than 3090 or even 4090 by everything I see. Nvidia might be out of their league finally and put into their place. I would not be surprised to see Big Navi designs at 150w with 10x the speed.
  • Rtx dude - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    3090 is twice the size of 3080. So, it will ebd big NAVI in performance and bebchmarks
  • Showtime - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Sorry, but with your name alone, we can't take anything you say seriously.
  • MrVibrato - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    Oh, but there are quite a few who couldn't resist the bait. Which, and this is one of my guilty pleasures, makes for entertaining reading...
  • hecksagon - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    He's referencing the performance improvement we will see in AMD's integrated graphics once the architectural improvements from Big Navi trickle down.
  • dotjaz - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    In the meantime, Intel wins for the next 8 months or so. We don't even know if Van Gogh can beat TGL yet.
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    That's a charitable interpretation, but actually this account is just a sockpuppet for an Intel shill who got tired of waiting for AMD fanboys to show up and so made one of their own. Everything they post is nonsensical junk.
  • AMDSuperFan - Monday, September 21, 2020 - link

    Even as a superfan it seems obvious that our amd cannot fight against this new technology. How is a usurper faster than us on video for gaming? As the owner of ATI, we are a video gaming company. Nvidia with their Voodoo 2 technology has nothing on ATI. My 7900 card is still fast for many games even today - but the same cannot be said for Voodoo 2 cards. But we have big things on the future and we should get back our championship in 2022.
  • PixyMisa - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    This was almost funny once.
  • SarahKerrigan - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Big Navi is a multi-hundred-watt dGPU. This is a laptop processor. They don't compete with each other at all.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now