Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XIV

Despite being one number less than Final Fantasy 15, because FF14 is a massively-multiplayer online title, there are always yearly update packages which give the opportunity for graphical updates too. In 2019, FFXIV launched its Shadowbringers expansion, and an official standalone benchmark was released at the same time for users to understand what level of performance they could expect. Much like the FF15 benchmark we’ve been using for a while, this test is a long 7-minute scene of simulated gameplay within the title. There are a number of interesting graphical features, and it certainly looks more like a 2019 title than a 2010 release, which is when FF14 first came out.

With this being a standalone benchmark, we do not have to worry about updates, and the idea for these sort of tests for end-users is to keep the code base consistent.

Final Fantasy XIV: 768p Minimum QualityFinal Fantasy XIV: 1080p Maximum Quality

This is an easy win for Intel.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Deus Ex Mankind Divided Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Really not sure what you're chatting about here - the Renoir system on test uses LPDDR4X at the same frequency as the TGL system.

    The only really relevant query would be over the thermal design of the system, but even then, the power consumption charts (did you check them?) show that the TGL system sticks to its limits in 15W mode.

    Basically it feels like you're scrabbling for complaints that aren't really justified.
  • proflogic - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    *yawn* Looks like I'll skip another generation. It looks like PCIE ACS started getting into root ports with ICL, so I was hoping for more impressive performance gains with TGL (probably shouldn't have expected much with still having 4 cores). For my intended workloads, this generation isn't worth the investment. YMMV.

    I'm probably waiting for whenever AMD gets USB4 into their platform.
  • ksec - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Those GPU benchmarks looks very strange. And some are missing the AMD 15W variants others are missing Intels.....

    So the graph looks very unbalanced.
  • IanCutress - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Limited time to test. I set the gaming benchmark script to run overnight, and until I actually look at the output data, I won't know if a particular test has failed or not run properly. Then Intel asked for the system back on Sunday.

    I technically went on holiday from Monday (booked ages ago), had to take the Lenovo AMD laptop with me to test in the hotel room, and lost two days of holiday to writing up the review. Turns out in the middle of nowhere you can't really download borderlands 3 in a reasonable time scale.
  • ksec - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Thanks Ian on the hard work.I dont know how the publisher or other people thinks. Personally I wish this would be first thing spelled out in the article. It also felt like Intel is rushing things a little bit this time.
  • asfletch - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Wow you can still travel? Not sure whether envious...(Australian here, locked down to 5km radius).
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Damn! That's dedication, but I sincerely hope you get some proper time out soon to make up for it. 👍
  • MCPicoli - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Locking security fixes behind "premium" versions? How about NO?
  • ballsystemlord - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    I agree. Security only for businesses is stupid.
  • WaltC - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Wake me in six months if and when you tag a retail unit to test...;) Intel is so thoughtful to send out unfinished units for Intel-managed reviews with pre-conditions and canned scenarios to try and make it appear to equal or exceed AMD's presently shipping, finished products. Yawn...what else is new?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now