Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XV

Upon arriving to PC, Final Fantasy XV: Windows Edition was given a graphical overhaul as it was ported over from console. As a fantasy RPG with a long history, the fruits of Square-Enix’s successful partnership with NVIDIA are on display. The game uses the internal Luminous Engine, and as with other Final Fantasy games, pushes the imagination of what we can do with the hardware underneath us. To that end, FFXV was one of the first games to promote the use of ‘video game landscape photography’, due in part to the extensive detail even at long range but also with the integration of NVIDIA’s Ansel software, that allowed for super-resolution imagery and post-processing effects to be applied.

In preparation for the launch of the game, Square Enix opted to release a standalone benchmark. Using the Final Fantasy XV standalone benchmark gives us a lengthy standardized sequence to record, although it should be noted that its heavy use of NVIDIA technology means that the Maximum setting has problems - it renders items off screen. To get around this, we use the standard preset which does not have these issues. We use the standard quality settings.

Final Fantasy XV: 720p Standard QualityFinal Fantasy XV: 8K Standard Quality

OK so testing at 8K was a complete accident. In that pure GPU limited scenario, Intel is ahead. When at 720p in a more standard combination of settings, Intel's 28 W goes above the 65 W desktop integrated graphics, but is behind when stuck in 15 W mode.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: Final Fantasy XIV Xe-LP GPU Performance: World of Tanks
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • JayNor - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    vs Ice Lake the new TGL architecture doubles the bandwidth of the ring bus, adds pcie4, lpddr5, thunderbolt4 and a much superior GPU ... When will AMD catch up? They still need to add avx512, dlboost, integrate wifi6 and now they are further behind. Or do they just add two more cores and declare it even since they can win at cinebench?
  • RSAUser - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    PCIe 4 will be next gen, and for current it doesn't really matter, pretty much no consumer SSD that can max it, and GPU is questionable.

    LPDDR5 should be 2022 with their next gen, which also includes PCIe5 by then.

    AV512 doesn't matter, not something you run on a laptop, DLBoost is Intel trademarked, there are other ML libraries that AMD uses, and you're not really running ML training on a laptop CPU, you'd use the GPU.

    The ring bus piece is an architecture difference, not sure why you're mentioning it? AMD's CCX design is better, Intel will be moving in that direction.

    In regards to integrated WiFi 6/802.11ax, that's a separate module added to the mobo, AMD is not a communication tech company.
  • JayNor - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    Intel integrates the Wifi6 high speed digital components into the PCH chiplet in the same package with the cores on the laptop chips.

    They build a separate wifi6 chip that OEMs can use with the AMD chips.
  • JayNor - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    Intel's ring bus wins...

    "We can also see that, even in the 15W configuration, Tiger Lake's dual ring bus delivers slightly more throughput than the 4800U's Infinity Fabric, and has 30% more throughput at 28W with dynamic tuning."

    https://www.tomshardware.com/features/intel-11th-g...
  • Rudde - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    You mean Intel caught up with AMD? Intel had a little over half the throughput of Renoir, when Renoir came out. Now Intel has caught up with AMD with Tiger Lake. AMD will likely pull ahead with Cezanne, continuing the back and forth.
  • Spunjji - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    Wow, parity at 15W and a win at nearly twice the TDP. Such wins.

    Seriously, why do you need to pathologically overstate their achievements?
  • MetaCube - Friday, October 23, 2020 - link

    "LPDDR5 should be 2022 with their next gen, which also includes PCIe5 by then." lmao
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    Maybe you dont care about having a better iGPU, but clearly its a selling point.
  • huangcjz - Thursday, September 17, 2020 - link

    I care about the integrated GPU. I only buy MacBooks, so AMD isn't a choice. I can't afford £2,400 for the 16" MacBook Pro with discrete graphics.
  • playtech1 - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    I've got some bad news for you... chances of Apple releasing a Tiger Lake MacBook looks very very slim

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now