Gaming: Final Fantasy XV

Upon arriving to PC earlier this, Final Fantasy XV: Windows Edition was given a graphical overhaul as it was ported over from console, fruits of their successful partnership with NVIDIA, with hardly any hint of the troubles during Final Fantasy XV's original production and development.

In preparation for the launch, Square Enix opted to release a standalone benchmark that they have since updated. Using the Final Fantasy XV standalone benchmark gives us a lengthy standardized sequence to record, although it should be noted that its heavy use of NVIDIA technology means that the Maximum setting has problems - it renders items off screen. To get around this, we use the standard preset which does not have these issues.

Square Enix has patched the benchmark with custom graphics settings and bugfixes to be much more accurate in profiling in-game performance and graphical options. For our testing, we run the standard benchmark with a FRAPs overlay, taking a 6 minute recording of the test.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile
Gaming: World of Tanks enCore Gaming: Civilization 6 (DX12)
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • Meteor2 - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    What a great site, thank you for posting it!
  • tommythorn - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    Typo: ">>Unfortuantely<< AMD has stated ..."

    "once in a while, a truly great CPU" The 300 (but really, 450) MHz Celeron C300 II was such a processor. It was a kludge (desperate to compete with AMD, Intel rushed out a chip that was essentially a P-II but much cheaper). It ended up being an amazing value and with a few hacks even become the introduction to SMP for many.
  • catavalon21 - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    I remember it well. Crazy to get a 50% overclock, but almost everyone's 300A would hit, and keep, 450.
  • MDD1963 - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    The famous Celeron 300A@464 MHz for $79 was quite popular, and, gamed as well as the $450 PII-450...
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, May 19, 2020 - link

    Funny how Intel's best price/performance moments tend to be knee-jerk responses to AMD :D
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    Does the USB-C Hub support AVX2?
  • 1_rick - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    I'm not sure. Do the chickens have large talons?
  • mikato - Sunday, May 24, 2020 - link

    Really, is that the only USB hub on sale in Australia to rank that high?
  • yeeeeman - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    Cheap price and good performance. That is why.
  • Flunk - Monday, May 18, 2020 - link

    $200 is the prime price for people building a fairly powerful computer, but with a budget. 3600 pairs well with pretty much any video card for gaming and is pretty powerful for anything else. Intel competition at this price point is weak, at least until Apollo Lake. 3600 is a obvious recommendation.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now