*We are currently in the middle of revisiting our CPU gaming benchmarks, but the new suite was not ready in time for this review. We plan to add in some new games (Borderland 3, Gears Tactics) and also upgrade our gaming GPU to a RTX 2080 Ti.

Gaming: Far Cry 5

The latest title in Ubisoft's Far Cry series lands us right into the unwelcoming arms of an armed militant cult in Montana, one of the many middles-of-nowhere in the United States. With a charismatic and enigmatic adversary, gorgeous landscapes of the northwestern American flavor, and lots of violence, it is classic Far Cry fare. Graphically intensive in an open-world environment, the game mixes in action and exploration.

Far Cry 5 does support Vega-centric features with Rapid Packed Math and Shader Intrinsics. Far Cry 5 also supports HDR (HDR10, scRGB, and FreeSync 2). We use the in-game benchmark for our data, and report the average/minimum frame rates.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

 

Gaming: Strange Brigade (DX12, Vulkan) AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 Conclusion
Comments Locked

249 Comments

View All Comments

  • ksec - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    It was only yday I asked on forum what is happening to Intel 7nm CPU. We know Tiger Lake is coming, then there is Alderlake. And that is it.

    Again, despite all these, AMD needs to "sell" better. The results from their quarterly report are no way near good enough.
  • outsideloop - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Hardware Unboxed includes the 9th Gen i3 and i5 parts against these new Ryzens, in their testing.
  • CrystalCowboy - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    About the test setup: No PCIe 4.0 graphics cards. No PCIe 4.0 NVME SSD. You are handicapping these CPUs by not letting them take full advantage of their features. If an older or lesser CPU cannot support these features, well then it deserves to score lower for it. You did use DDR4-3200 RAM, thanks for that.
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Users with a $99 CPU are going to use a PCIe 4.0 SSD? really?
    How do I keep the storage element consistent between tests then, to make sure I'm actually testing the CPU? How do I keep that storage constant for CPUs 10 years ago?
  • Makaveli - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Yup Ian,

    That complaint is ridiculous, almost no one is going PCIe 4 storage in a budget build.

  • MDD1963 - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    can't wait for a water block equipped X570 for $800 and the R3-3100 to get the best OC's possible with muh PCI-e 4.0 storage......!!!! :) (Who cares if PCI-e 4.0 drives sometimes fare 1-3% worse than the 970 EVO in some real world comparisons!)
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    Maybe it's because after buying a PCIe 4 capable MB and a PCIe 4 SSD, I wouldn't have any money left to buy a CPU for more than $ 100? Kidding, of course, this challenge makes no sense.
    That aside, it would be interesting to see what kind of CPU can actually make good use of PCIe 4 capable MBs and fast storage.
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    $500 Car w/ $10,000 rims
  • MDD1963 - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Yes, PCI-e 4.0 SSDs would have help *so much* on ... gaming frame rates.... <exaggerated overtly obvious eye roll> :)
  • eastcoast_pete - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Thanks Ian! If possible, please add some performance numbers for the current i3 and i5 in. Right now, AMD owns the below $200 space for desktop CPUs. Also, data from other websites that had some i5-9100 on hand show that the 3100 A.K.A AMD's leftover dies, are outperforming Intel's offerings here.
    Really hope Intel steps up, and soon. I'm hoping to buy something later this year, so whoever gives me the most bang for my buck gets my money.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now