GPU Performance

Eurocom offers a wide-range of MXM modules to outfit the Sky X7C as desired, starting at the NVIDIA GTX 1060, and going all the way up to the same RTX 2080 that powers this review unit. The RTX 2080 is currently sits at the top of the product stack for notebook computers, and will likely remain that way for some time unless NVIDIA decides to give the RTX notebook lineup the Super treatment. That does seem unlikely, since one of the biggest changes to the latest RTX Super cards is increased power draw, which is something notebooks would struggle with. NVIDIA rates the RTX 2080 at 80-150W+ officially, meaning there’s a lot of room for the manufacturer to tweak the power draw of the card to match the device it is in, and we’ve already seen that this can play a big factor in overall performance, especially in thin and light laptops.

As an MXM3 module, the Eurocom Sky X7C also offers some upgradability in the GPU department as well, although finding and replacing MXM cards can be an expensive upgrade, but it is at least an option that smaller, soldered notebooks do not even offer.

To see how the Eurocom Sky X7C performs, it’s been tested against a couple of synthetics, and our gaming laptop suite of games.

3DMark

Futuremark 3DMark Fire Strike

Futuremark 3DMark Sky Diver

Futuremark 3DMark Cloud Gate

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Graphics

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Physics

UL’s 3DMark offers a variety of tests, from the very demanding Fire Strike down to Ice Storm Unlimited, which can be run on a tablet. The Sky X7C is the fastest single-card laptop we’ve tested to date, unsurprisingly, and offers generally more performance than even the 1080 SLI GT83VR Titan, with the exception of Fire Strike which is the most GPU limited test of the bunch. As the tests get less GPU limited, the dramatically faster processor pulls the desktop replacement ahead and keeps it there for the rest of the tests.

GFXBench

GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal 1080p Offscreen

GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High 1440p Offscreen

GFXBench offers DX12 tests with the Aztec Ruins workloads, and as a test that is cross-platform and available for smartphones, it’s not much of a challenge for a system with this much performance. It does appear to be GPU limited though, with the Eurocom neck and neck with the MSI GE75 Raider.

Dota 2

Dota 2 Reborn - Enthusiast

One of the most popular arena battle games is Dota 2, and although this is a game that can be run even on integrated graphics, it can be CPU limited, and the Core i9-9900K drags the Eurocom well ahead of any other RTX 2080 laptop we’ve tested.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The original Tomb Raider can still be a challenge for some gaming laptops with lighter GPUs, but not so much for an RTX 2080.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The second installment of the latest Lara Croft series is much more demanding than the original, with some breathtaking imagery in the game. The Eurocom jumps to the top again.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The most recent installment of the Tomb Raider series bumps the visuals yet again, and this DX12 title is still very challenging even at just 1920x1080. Although the Eurocom Sky X7C averages 116 FPS in this test, and is easily playable, that’s well below the refresh rate of many 1920x1080 laptop displays.

Civilization VI

Civilization VI Enthusiast

The current version of Civilization VI tends to be heavily CPU bound, especially on the end-of-turn, and the extra grunt of the Core i9-9900K really shows in this title.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite - Enthusiast

Bioshock was a great franchise, and it’s loss is a loss to all of us, but this game is not a challenge for so powerful a notebook.

Shadow of Mordor

Shadow of Mordor - Enthusiast

The first installment in this game set in Tolkein’s Middle Earth is easily playable on a modern system with an RTX 2080, and the Eurocom Sky X7C breezes through this test.

Shadow of War

Shadow of War - Enthusiast

The latest version of the open world action role-playing series is more demanding of the GPU, and at the highest settings the Eurocom Sky X7C once again jumps to the top of the stack, although not much over the MSI GE75 Raider with the same GPU, meaning this game is more GPU bound than CPU.

F1 2017

F1 2017 - Enthusiast

We always like to include one of the games featuring Codemasters’s Ego engine, and that game is currently F1 2017. The Ego games tend to be more CPU limited than other titles, and that shows with our results.

Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5 - Enthusiast

Despite being a graphical showcase, Ubisoft’s Far Cry 5 is actually one of the most CPU limited of the big FPS games at the moment, so the extra grunt from the i9-9900K really shows through here, with a significant lead over the other RTX 2080 notebooks.

High Resolution Gaming

Although 1920x1080 has dominated gaming for some time, over the last couple of years there has been a surge in the number of high-resolution displays shipping with notebooks, and of course as a Desktop Replacement class computer, the Eurocom Sky X7C can easily be connected to an external display as well, so in addition to our normal 1920x1080 tests, the high-end gaming laptops of recent vintage have also been tested at both QHD and UHD resolutions.

QHD Gaming

When gaming at QHD, even with the RTX 2080, there is still a significant framerate hit, although the faster processor in the Eurocom notebook still helps it pull ahead, especially in Far Cry 5 which is the most CPU limited game of the three.

UHD Gaming

When stepping up to UHD though, the framerate average dips below the 60 FPS you would really prefer to see, even with a Core i9-9900K and RTX 2080 powering the system. If you want to game at UHD, even with the latest hardware you are going to need to adjust the settings to compensate for that resolution, whether manually or using something like the GeForce Experience software to configure the game settings.

This leads to the eternal question of whether gaming is better at UHD but 60 FPS or under, or 1920x1080 with a high-refresh display such as the 144 Hz IPS panel that has been shipping in the last generation. Luckily with the Eurocom Sky X7C, that choice is yours, since Eurocom will configure the X7C with either of those displays, or several others as well, including the 2560x1440 120 Hz panel. If I was buying, I would choose the 144 Hz 1920x1080 with G-SYNC for the ultimate in smoothness, but as with most things about this notebook, there is far more choice available than on most systems.

System Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • p1esk - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    I love the option of 1440p at 120Hz! Hope to see it in normal laptops (perhaps new MBPs can lead the way to improved refresh rates?)
  • HollyDOL - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    Since the article title talks about 'true desktop replacement', could we get price and performance comparison to desktop with "same" parts? ie. DDR4-3000 + 9900K + RTX 2080...
  • Brett Howse - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    Our GPU bench is currently an i9-9900K as well. As a comparison I got 116 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Ryan got 114.6 with the desktop version, so the performance seems similar. Unfortunately we don't have a lot of overlap on our tests though because Ryan is able to keep GPUs and benchmark them on new suites whereas laptops have to go back to the manufacturers so I don't rotate the tests as heavily since every time I add a new test it starts out with zero results to compare against.

    Is there a particular title you'd like to see compared against other than Shadow of the Tomb Raider?
  • HollyDOL - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    nice, thanks...
    Compile Chromium (time) test would be nice...
    or in general anything that puts the machine under high sustained stress for longer period (45mins+)...
  • craz8 - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    I have one of these laptops - a Sager branded one.

    It really is quite heavy, and the 330W power brick is equally beefy - I selected the RTX 2070 to avoid needing double power bricks. I do use this on my lap, but the power plug at the back falls out a lot in this configuration. It's not a very secure connection. Since it's at the back, the only way to notice is that suddenly the CPU is running at 1.3Ghz instead of 4+

    I almost always run this in Quiet mode, as the fans are almost silent in this mode. When I'm stressing the machine, the CPU clocks down to about 3.4-3.6 Ghz, which is still good enough for the work I do on it. If I run in performance mode, the things I run go a little faster, but the fan noise is not worth the extra speed.

    There really isn't enough cooling for Nvme drives. Even small amounts of writing to them immediately pushes the temps to 90+, and there's no room for extra heatsinks to help with this.

    I have the 4K screen, which seems pretty good, but if you dual boot into a Linux OS, the bootloader screen is hilariously small, and some versions of Linux have poor scaling options

    I mostly use this on my desk, and it (or Windows 10) really doesn't like my CalDigital TB3 dock. Luckily, everything plugs into the chassis (unlike recent Apple hardware)

    I don't play games on this, so barely use the GPU (RTX 2070). I'd love to have options to push more power and cooling to the CPU whilst scaling them back to the GPU without having to poke at the values manually.

    Overall, I like mine, but it does have quirks.
  • Alistair - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    I think you'd be much better off with a (I hate to say it) nVidia creator laptop, or a 9880H/9980HK laptop with a 120/144hz Gsync IPS screen. We need a comparison with Clevo of the MSI Stealth and Raider and Titan.

    https://www.newegg.com/matte-black-with-gold-diamo...
  • Brahman05 - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    I have sager's version of the x9e2 with a 7700k and 1080sli and the same 1440p panel, and the panel is both one of the best and worst parts in the thing. One thing not mentioned in this article is the gtg does not really support the refresh rate, but by reporting a 120hz refresh it at least still cuts down on input lag. I really have no complaints though. When I got it I had a mobile lifestyle and had the money for it, my only two real gripes are ZEN and RTx. Not 3 months after I got the thing AMD goes and makes 8c16t a thing and even if the architecture is pretry much the same from the 6700k to the 9900k the productivity of the same class chip is now double. And with RTX going to NVLink for an sli bridge Nvidia has axed mobile sli due to the complexity involved in producing that type of connector. So this X7c is really the way to go anymore. Damn you progress!
  • LsRamAir - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    No Overclocking detail... bahhhh! Pushing these DTRs to the max that their cooling allows for is what at least half of their buyers do... Next time, yes please! (Especially in the wake of similarly spec'd DTR machines burning out under mild OC's, which SHOULD NOT HAPPEN, it would be nice to know if this SKY is also part of the bad choices group.)
  • peteraustin - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    Amazing article https://www.anandtech.com/ you should definitely read it in your spare time
  • hennes - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    I recently got this laptop as a replacement for a 10 1/2-year-old laptop. I wanted a full-sized keyboard, which means 17” or larger. Potable means 17” really it the limit. And 17” is perfect for 2k screens.
    The Sky X7 was one of the few which offered that and it had all my desired other connectivity (multiple NVME, multiple DP out, a few fast USB ports, thunderbolt, …

    What really was surprising is how few other there are. Many with low res displays (1920x1080) which makes sense for gaming. Some with 4K displays future proof but quite small on a 17” display.

    That made the X7C almost the only sensible choice.

    And from an engineering view the thicker than average body was also very attractive. As were the looks. Form over function simply looks good, while designed stuff tend to look odd and twisted to me.
    The only thing it lacks for me is more battery capacity. Lugging the large charger around is not fun and two battery slots (or 2x 80) for airplane use would have been my choice if it was offered.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now