Gaming: Far Cry 5

The latest title in Ubisoft's Far Cry series lands us right into the unwelcoming arms of an armed militant cult in Montana, one of the many middles-of-nowhere in the United States. With a charismatic and enigmatic adversary, gorgeous landscapes of the northwestern American flavor, and lots of violence, it is classic Far Cry fare. Graphically intensive in an open-world environment, the game mixes in action and exploration.

Far Cry 5 does support Vega-centric features with Rapid Packed Math and Shader Intrinsics. Far Cry 5 also supports HDR (HDR10, scRGB, and FreeSync 2). We use the in-game benchmark for our data, and report the average/minimum frame rates.

AnandTech CPU Gaming 2019 Game List
Game Genre Release Date API IGP Low Med High
Far Cry 5 FPS Mar
2018
DX11 720p
Low
1080p
Normal
1440p
High
4K
Ultra

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Far Cry 5 IGP Low High
Average FPS
Minimum FPS

Far Cry 5 is another game that at reasonable 1080p settings actually shows some CPU differentiation. To really drive a wedge between the CPUs we do need to drop to 720p Low, but still, in both cases the 9900K comes out on top. And in this case the performance gap between it and the 8700K is actually a bit larger than normal at 12%. Still, this is a game that’s if it’s not GPU-bound is closer to being bounded by a limited number of threads, so the lack of major clockspeed gains for the 9900K keep it from pulling too far ahead. It also keeps the 9700K from falling too far behind.

Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V Gaming: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX12)
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • mkaibear - Sunday, October 28, 2018 - link

    Yes. Because MSRP is set by the manufacturer and the retail price is set by the retailer. And otherwise they'd have to update the article every single time a price changes.
  • Outlander_04 - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    So not value for money, definitely not value for money for gamers, and TWO HUNDRED AND TEN INSANE WATTS OF POWER DRAW.
    Funniest thing I have heard for a while now
  • Tkan2155 - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    No way im getting this 180 watts. 7nm will help to save energy. Amd need to take down intel. Lets do it together. I cannot stand intel anymore.
  • AutomaticTaco - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Revised power consumption. First motherboard was over-voltage.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen...

    Also, when Overclocked, and set to 1.075v for CPU the consumption actually dropped to 127W max.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen...
  • WannaBeOCer - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Can you post power consumption with MCE Off? The 9900K is a 4.3GHz processor not a 4.7GHz. MCE Auto on Asus boards boost the CPU to 4.7GHz on all 8 cores.
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, October 21, 2018 - link

    I remember there was much debate a year or so ago about that, but the whole issue seems to have faded away.
  • Synomenon - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Will the "Thermalright TRUE Spirit 120M BW Rev.A" with push / pull fans be enough to cool the 9900K?

    http://thermalright.com/product/true-spirit-120m-b...
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, October 21, 2018 - link

    At stock, maybe. Oc'd, almost certainly not.
  • daxpax - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    funny there's not 2700x included in benchmarks where AMD has advantage. clearly intel sponsored article
  • kaosou - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    I have a bit of a problem with the price you put on all the charts for ThreadRipper 1920X, at the time the article is posted, you can find TR 1920X at around USD 400, and the USD 799 price you put in the chart is very misleading.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now