Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V

The highly anticipated iteration of the Grand Theft Auto franchise hit the shelves on April 14th 2015, with both AMD and NVIDIA in tow to help optimize the title. GTA doesn’t provide graphical presets, but opens up the options to users and extends the boundaries by pushing even the hardest systems to the limit using Rockstar’s Advanced Game Engine under DirectX 11. Whether the user is flying high in the mountains with long draw distances or dealing with assorted trash in the city, when cranked up to maximum it creates stunning visuals but hard work for both the CPU and the GPU.

For our test we have scripted a version of the in-game benchmark. The in-game benchmark consists of five scenarios: four short panning shots with varying lighting and weather effects, and a fifth action sequence that lasts around 90 seconds. We use only the final part of the benchmark, which combines a flight scene in a jet followed by an inner city drive-by through several intersections followed by ramming a tanker that explodes, causing other cars to explode as well. This is a mix of distance rendering followed by a detailed near-rendering action sequence, and the title thankfully spits out frame time data.

AnandTech CPU Gaming 2019 Game List
Game Genre Release Date API IGP Low Med High
Grand Theft Auto V Open World Apr
2015
DX11 720p
Low
1080p
High
1440p
Very High
4K
Ultra
*Strange Brigade is run in DX12 and Vulkan modes

There are no presets for the graphics options on GTA, allowing the user to adjust options such as population density and distance scaling on sliders, but others such as texture/shadow/shader/water quality from Low to Very High. Other options include MSAA, soft shadows, post effects, shadow resolution and extended draw distance options. There is a handy option at the top which shows how much video memory the options are expected to consume, with obvious repercussions if a user requests more video memory than is present on the card (although there’s no obvious indication if you have a low end GPU with lots of GPU memory, like an R7 240 4GB).

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

GTA 5 IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

GTA V is always an amusing game, and not just for its criminal hi-jinx. Originally released for the last-gen consoles years ago – with the best CPUs and GPUs of 2005/2006 – it still sells well. More importantly, it can still punish a modern GPU. And CPUs don’t get off too easily either, especially at our 1080p high settings. In this case the CFL-R chips take a 1-2-3 win, all of them pushing past even the 8700K. The performance gain is nothing to write home about, but the 9900K has improved over its predecessor by 9%.

However these CPU differences quickly become irrelevant at higher, more GPU-demanding settings. At 1440p Very High we’re looking at a tie for the top 7 CPUs, and no one is getting more than 23fps at 4K.

Gaming: Strange Brigade (DX12, Vulkan) Gaming: Far Cry 5
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • 0ldman79 - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    AMD needs to improve their AVX processing as well, but they've got Intel in a bit of a predicament.
  • Hifihedgehog - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you...

    Intel’s FX 9000 series.

    Now even hotter and more power hungry than ever!
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, October 21, 2018 - link

    It reminds me a lot of the P4 days when Intel just had to shove clocks through the roof to remain relevant. And I don't know why tech sites are salivating so much on oc levels that are barely any better than a chip's max turbo, it's a far cry from the days of SB, especially since one can run a 2700K at 5GHz with sensible voltage and good temps using a simple air cooler (ordinary TRUE works fine) and one fan, without high noise (I know, I've built seven of them so far). To me, the oc'ing potential of the 9K series is just boring, especially since the cost is so high that for gaming one is far better off buying a 2700X, 8700K (or many other options) and using the save to get a better GPU.
  • sgeocla - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    Why compare to the TR 1920x ($799) and not to the TR 2950X ($899)?
    The TR 2950X kills it in almost every productivity benchmark even against i-9 9900k.
    Not even mentioning the 9th gen power consumption.
  • Yorgos - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    don't bother with the review.
    They show you the results that makes intel seem good.
    Intel/Purch media have failed to show to the people that they exceed even Threadripper's TDP in order to fight Zen.
    Desperate moves for desperate times.
    Better look somewhere else for an unbiased review.
  • mkaibear - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    What, you mean apart from page 21 where it shows that it almost doubles Threadripper's TDP for the same core count CPU and is 50% greater than the one which has 50% more cores than it does?

    Some reading comprehension lessons needed I think.
  • yeeeeman - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    The 9900K looks like a nice CPU, but damn that power consumption is stupidly high. It is almost twice what the 2700X consumes.
  • Hifihedgehog - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    *High-end AIO required.
  • AGS3 - Friday, October 19, 2018 - link

    Twice the CPU - 8 cores over 5Ghz :)
  • AutomaticTaco - Saturday, October 20, 2018 - link

    Revised down. The first motherboard they used was extremely higher voltage settings.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now