Western Digital has introduced its new WD Red SA500 family of specialized SSDs, which are designed for caching data in NAS devices. The drives are available in four different capacities from 500 GB to 4 TB to satisfy demands of different customers. To maximize their compatibility, the SSDs feature a SATA 6 Gbps interface and come in M.2-2280 or 2.5-inch/7-mm form-factors.

Now that many desktop PCs have either been replaced by laptops or are so small that they cannot house a decent number of capacious hard drives, NAS use is gaining traction among those individuals and small businesses who need to store fairly large amounts of data. To provide such customers high performance (which is comparable to that of internal storage), many NAS these days feature a 10GbE network adapter as well as a special bay (or bays) for a caching SSD. However, the vast majority of client SSDs on the market were not designed for pure caching workloads, which are more write-heavy than typical consumer workloads. Seagate with its IronWolf 110 was the first company to launch an SSD architected for NAS caching early this year and now Western Digital follows the suit with its WD Red SA500 family, which is broader than that offered by its rival.

While it's not being disclosed by the company, Western Digital’s WD Red SA500 SSDs are based on Marvell's proven 88SS1074 controller, and paired with the company’s 3D TLC NAND memory. When it comes to capacities, the new WD Red SA500 drives are available in two form-factors: M.2-2280 models offer 500 GB, 1 TB, and 2 TB capacities, whereas 2.5-inch/7-mm SKUs can store 500 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB and 4 TB of data.

Performance-wise, the WD Red SA500 offers up to 560 MB/s sequential read speeds, up to 530 MB/s sequential write speeds, and up to 95K/85K random read/write IOPS, which is in line with advanced client SATA SSDs. But the key difference between typical client drives equipped with the same controller and the WD Red SA500 is a special firmware optimized for more evenly mixed workloads and engineered to ensure longevity. By contrast,  client SSDs are tailored mostly for fast reads.

As far as endurance is concerned, the WD Red SA500 SSDs are rated for 0.32 – 0.38 DWPD over a five-year warranty period, which is in line with that of modern desktop drives. This is admittedly not especially high for a drive that can fill itself in under an hour, but presumably Western Digital confident that the caching algorithms in modern NASes are not so aggressive that the drives will be extensively rewritten. Moreover, at the end of the day we are talking about consumer as well as SMB-class NASes, where the expected workloads are lower than with enterprise systems.

The WD Red SA500 Caching SSDs for NAS
Capacity 500 GB 1 TB 2 TB 4 TB
Model Number ? ? ? ?
Controller Marvell 88SS1074
NAND Flash 3D TLC NAND
Form-Factor, Interface M.2 M.2-2280, SATA 6 Gbps -
DFF 2.5-inch/7-mm, SATA 6 Gbps
Sequential Read 560 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s
Random Read IOPS 95K
Random Write IOPS 85K 82K
Pseudo-SLC Caching ?
DRAM Buffer Yes, capacity unknown
TCG Opal Encryption ?
Power Consumption Avg Active 52 mW 60 mW 60 mW
Max. Read 2050 mW 2550 mW 3000 mW
Max. Write 3350 mW 3750 mW 3800 mW
Slumber 56 mW 56 mW
DEVSLP 5-7 mW 5-12 mW
Warranty 5 years
MTBF 2 million hours
TBW 350 600 1300 2500
DWPD 0.38 0.32 0.35 0.34
UBER 1E10^17
Additional Information Link
MSRP M.2 $72 ? $297 -
DFF $75 ? ? $600

Western Digital’s WD Red SA500 SSDs are currently available directly from the company, with broader availability expected in November. The cheapest 500 GB model costs $72 – $75 depending on the form-factor, the top-of-the-range M.2 2 TB SKU is priced at $297, whereas the highest-capacity 4 TB 2.5-inch model carries a $600 price tag.

Related Reading:

Source: Western Digital

POST A COMMENT

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • Golgatha777 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    All that speed and no affordable 10 Gb hardware to take advantage of any of it. Reply
  • igavus - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    What speed are you talking of? The read/write numbers are just.. sad, 10G is needless for this. Reply
  • willis936 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    Are you sure you're looking at the right spec table? Reply
  • Sivar - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    The drive can read and write (STR) >500MB/sec. Gigabit Ethernet tops out at 125MB/sec in impossibly perfect conditions.
    5Gbit is the minimum network bandwidth needed to stress even one of these drives.
    Reply
  • name99 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    I frequently get sustained 112 MB/s from my gigE (SSD on iMac through two switches to iMac Pro).
    Maybe not 125, but I can't complain given the iMac is 7 yrs old and one of the switches is even older.

    But the rest of your point is perfectly valid and legit! Hell, we don't even need 10G, infrastructure for multiGig (2.5 and 5G) would be welcome!
    Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    112 is not 125. His point still stands.

    2.5G should have become the standard years ago, given it uses the same hardware.
    Reply
  • npz - Friday, November 01, 2019 - link

    Also, one can always stripe the SSD caches and most NAS, whether commercial or home built will have at least 2x ports/slots/bays for them so 10G can definitely be reached reading and writing to them Reply
  • Jorgp2 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    ?

    There's a $150 4 port switch, and cheap cards on eBay.
    Reply
  • dgingeri - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    There's a $130 4X10Gb+1X1Gb switch and $85 X520 NICs on Amazon, new. I find that quite affordable. Reply
  • name99 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    That's SFP (not ideal), but yeh, that's definitely a step in the right direction. How new is this product (I didn't see it last time I looked maybe 6 weeks ago)?

    Still too industrial looking, still too targeted at enterprise rather than simple home use. But definitely progress.
    I'd be willing to pay that price for 5 RJ45 ports, slightly less aggressive appearance, and simple "switch it on and plug in" -- drop the RouterOS, VLAN, management and everything else that's no important for home and just adds things that can go wrong.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now