In a surprise announcement, Samsung today unveiled their very first SoC with integrated 5G connectivity. The new chipset isn’t a flagship follow-up to the Exynos 9825 and 9820, but rather a new entry to the mid-range and seemingly a follow-up to the Exynos 9610 chipset. Nevertheless, the new chip brings a slew of new firsts to the market which should help the new Exynos 980 to be extremely competitive with upcoming offerings from Qualcomm and MediaTek.

Samsung Exynos SoCs Specifications
SoC Exynos 980 Exynos 9610
CPU 2x Cortex-A77 @ 2.2GHz
+ 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
2x Cortex-A73 @ 2.3GHz
+ 4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.7GHz
GPU Mali G76MP5 Mali G72MP3
NPU Integrated -
Memory
Controller
LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Media 10bit 4K120 encode & decode
H.265/HEVC, H.264, VP9
10bit 4K120 encode & decode
H.265/HEVC, H.264, VP9
Modem Shannon Integrated 

(LTE Category 16/18)
DL = 1000 Mbps
5x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 200 Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 2550 Mbps
UL = 1280 Mbps
Shannon Integrated

(LTE Category 13/13)
DL = 600 Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 150 Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
WiFi Integrated 802.11ax (WiFi 6) Integrated 802.11ac (WiFi 5)
ISP Main: 108MP
Dual: 20MP+20MP
Rear: 24MP
Front: 24MP
Dual: 16MP+16MP
Mfc.
Process
Samsung
8nm LPP
Samsung
10nm LPP

The very odd thing about the Exynos 980 is its new naming scheme. This is the first time Samsung has opted for a three numeral scheme in its Exynos line-up which is certainly bound to be a bit confusing at the beginning, certainly also because of similarities in the naming to the Kirin 980. However it’s quite evident that this new chip looks to be a follow-up to the Exynos 9610. I’m questioning Samsung’s naming scheme here and how it’ll play out for its follow-up chips both in the mid-range and next flagship iterations.

Nevertheless, the new Exynos 980 is the first chip to be announced to come with the new Cortex-A77 CPU from Arm. Whilst Samsung was able to jump the gun here in terms of announcement, we’re still expecting HiSilicon to be the first to market with a SoC with the new CPU in the next few weeks. Samsung’s integration of the new CPU within a mid-range SoC is quite aggressive, particularly seeing that the company lagged behind in this regard in previous generation Exynos SoCs such as the 9610. The A77 cores are clocked in at 2.2GHz which is naturally quite a bit less than what we expect of flagships, but the cores should be extremely efficient in this implementation. The two big cores are accompanied by 6 Cortex-A55’s at 1.8GHz, making this a octa-core SoC.

The GPU on the Exynos 980 is the same as its last flagship SoCs, a Mali-G76, however this time it’s only in an MP5 configuration which is less than half the cores of its flagship counterpart. I’m expecting the clock frequency of this GPU to be a lot more aggressive than its flagship counter-part, so performance should be more than half, which is actually quite a good performance target relative to Qualcomm’s mid-range SoCs.

The new chip is also the first mid-range from Samsung to integrate their in-house NPU architecture which the company promotes as augmenting camera capture abilities of the SoC platform.

The biggest news however is the announcement that this is an SoC with integrated 5G modem. Although we still have to wait out the competition, it might be one of the first SoCs with such integrated connectivity. LTE connectivity corresponds to Category 16/18 with 1000/200Mbps download and upload speeds, enabled through 5CA/2CA connectivity. On top of the LTE connectivity, the chip also supports 5G NR Sub-6 with speeds of up to 2550/1280Mbps. Through E-UTRA-NR Dual Connecivity (EN-DC), the modem can bundle LTE and 5G NR together and achieve up to 3.55Gbps download speeds. This modem looks to lack mmWave capabilities, but given its mid-range positioning as well as global preference of Sub-6 5G connectivity, it looks to be a strategic decision based on cost-effectiveness.

Also a first, is the fact that the new chip now integrates WiFi 6 (802.11ax). Samsung had started with its own WiFi connectivity solutions last year, integrating them into the SoCs, something we’ve yet to see implemented by vendors in the higher-end flagship SoCs which rely on external combo-chips.

Finally, the SoC promises ISP camera ability to support up to 108MP sensors, which falls in line with S.LSI’s own 108MP Isocell camera sensor.

The Exynos 980 is to start mass production by the end of the year and we’re likely to see devices shortly after. Overall, the chip seems unusually competitive for Samsung, showcasing quite a lot of firsts. Along with the new naming scheme, it feels a bit of a strategy shift compared to previous generation mid-range Exynos chips. Hopefully the new design enables Samsung to better compete for design wins outside of Samsung’s own Mobile division.

Related Reading:

POST A COMMENT

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • brakdoo - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    "the new Exynos 980 is the first chip to be announced to come with the new Cortex-A77 CPU from Arm"

    No, the Mediatek 5G SoC is the first announced with A77. This is clearly Samsung's answer but Mediatek's device seems to be a better choice being 7 nm and using Mali G77.

    The high-end SoC market might get cannibalized by these new mid-range 5G chips. The obvious loser will be Qualcomm...
    Reply
  • brakdoo - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    "The new chipset will be ready for lead customer samples in Q3 of 2019 and be in commercial devices by Q1 of 2020"

    https://www.mediatek.com/news-events/press-release...
    Reply
  • ZolaIII - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    I would really like to see E1's in commercial SoC's preferably eight of them as they would have ¼ power consumption and 50% performance per core compared to A77. Most significantly that would boost base user experience while power/area swings should be used for implementation bigger GPU and decent memory controller. Reply
  • Lodix - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    E1? Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    Neoverse E1. That CPU will not be employed in mobile devices. Reply
  • ZolaIII - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    Why not? I mean I know ARM ment it to go on network servers & data centers but that's not really a stopping factor. It's meant to go on DynamIQ clusters so it's integration is fairly easy. We desperately need a energy efficient enough OoO core's as a switch for in order one's where that's achievable on leading edge lithography. In such condition E1 fine tuned around 2 GHz wouldn't use more than 100~120 mW paird with second gen 7 nm EUV FinFET (based on free estimates on ARM own protections). That leaves 1.5~1.7 W out of 2.5 for everything else while CPU's are in full load... I mean really this would be a step up & a simple one. Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    SMT makes zero sense in mobile as it's not power-efficient, Arm has no plans to adopt it outside infrastructure / inside mobile. Reply
  • ZolaIII - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    We could argue about SMT & especially vertical implementation of it as MIPS did & how efficient it is after all ARM claims E1 is most power efficient OoO design ever. Truth is it would need some scheduler adjustments and won't play nice with big little scheduling. ARM plans... They will soon be glad to sell what ever they can. Reply
  • Gemuk - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    Hoping that this will go into the A51 might be too optimistic, but it will be nice if the A71 gets it, at least. Would be great if the 970, 960 etc. are just as attractive. Qualcomm (us) could really use some competition. Reply
  • SydneyBlue120d - Wednesday, September 04, 2019 - link

    Is 5G SA supported? Or just NSA?
    What about AV1 encoding in 2160p60 ?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now