While the first HDMI 2.1 48G-branded cables were announced back in late 2018, they were not formally certified by the HDMI Forum for one reason: the certification program for HDMI 2.1 was not ready then and it is still not ready now. Yet, numerous developers of cables are already demonstrating prototypes of their HDMI 48G products that are marked as Ultra High Speed HDMI. Furthermore, makers of televisions are prepping the first Ultra-HD TVs that use HDMI 2.1.

UHS HDMI Certification Program

HDMI 2.1 48G cables use four data lanes operating at 12 Gbps each for an aggregate bandwidth of 48 Gbps, up from 18 Gbps today, yet retaining backwards compatibility with existing equipment. The additional bandwidth HDMI 2.1 offers enables it to support new Ultra-HD resolutions and refresh rates including, including 4Kp120, 8Kp100/120, 10Kp100/120, and upcoming color spaces, such as BT.2020 (Rec. 2020) with 10, 12, or even more advanced with 16 bits per color component. Actually, high resolutions and bit depths eat up 48 Gbps of bandwidth quickly, so for anything higher than 8Kp60 with 4:2:0 chroma sub sampling and 10-bit color, VESA’s DSC 1.2a link compression technology is used.

Since HDMI 2.1 48G cables as well as sources and sinks are physically different from existing HDMI 1.4/2.0 cables, makers of appropriate products have to adopt new manufacturing methods, whereas HDMI Forum has to introduce a new certification program that includes various compliance tests that ensure that interconnections work fine at high data rates and support all the features. Makers of cables are typically experienced enough to build HDMI 2.1 48G products, HDMI Forum admits. Since however there is no HDMI 2.1 48G certification program, they are not advised to sell products marked as Ultra High Speed HDMI Cables.

The HDMI Forum plans to make its UHS HDMI interconnection certification program available in the next several months, so expect ‘official’ HDMI 48G copper and optical cables to become available in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, once compliance tests are ready, makers of TVs will be able to mark their TVs as HDMI 2.1 compatible.

In addition to new resolutions, refresh rates, and HDR bit depths, HDMI 2.1 offers numerous new features, including Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Quick Media Switching (QMS), Quick Frame Transport (QFT), and eARC. These capabilities do not need 48G cables for content with up to 4Kp60 resolution and 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. But, a combination of 4Kp120/4:4:4 and VRR will require UHS HDMI cables. Meanwhile, once the new cables are available, the industry is going to need 4Kp120 or 8Kp60 sources and content.

2020 Summer Olympics & China to Drive 8K Adoption

By now, numerous leading makers of televisions have introduced their Ultra-HD TVs with an 8K resolution. Meanwhile, since 8K content is barely available, such devices are hardly popular among the end user. This is going to change next year when Tokyo 2020 summer Olympics will be filmed and broadcast in this resolution. Furthermore, as China has a government plan to transit to 4K and 8K broadcasting in the next few years, Ultra-HD content will get another boost.

Sports fans will naturally appreciate Tokyo 2020 and Beijing 2022 Olympics filmed in 8K, people from the HDMI Forum believe, which will boost adoption of the latest televisions not only in Japan and China, but everywhere across the world. Another major driver for Ultra-HD adoption will be the plan of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, National Radio and Television Administration, and the China Media Group (CMG) to develop Ultra-HD industry in 2019 – 2022. The plan looks very complex as it includes everything from content creation to broadcasting to production of equipment for creators and users.

Related Reading:

Want to keep up to date with all of our Computex 2019 Coverage?
 
Laptops
 
Hardware
 
Chips
 
Follow AnandTech's breaking news here!
POST A COMMENT

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    I'm waiting for the $18k USD Best Buy Monster cable with free shipping and an $8 USD mail in rebate before I make a purchase. Oh, it should have RGB also...like the whole thing should be plastered with RGBs that I can't control unless I plug a PC into a second USB connector and then install software that requires Internet access and a login registered to my e-mail account. Where's Razer's people at? Someone over there should get on this right away! Reply
  • dullard - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    You forgot to add that the web access leaves your user name and password in plain text. And you forgot an IoT connection to the cable so that (1) your cable overloads the number of connections that your WiFi router can handle properly and (2) you have to regularly update your cable with patches for critical security failures that come 3 months after you have been hacked. Reply
  • Cullinaire - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    Why bother with all that when they can just give you a year of life lock? Reply
  • DanNeely - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    You're also forgetting that it will expose telnet to the internet with a login of root/p@$$w0rd Reply
  • dullard - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    That said, I like your RGB requirement. Who doesn't want extra power consumption and extra heat to dissipate along with annoying light? Reply
  • chaos215bar2 - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    On the one hand, you basically just described my bias lighting, which is *amazing*. On the other, my bias lighting would also be pretty annoying if it was RGB, required an always on internet connection, exposed telnet with a login of root/p@$$w0rd, and signed me up for a year of LifeLock. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    Agreed, if there's one thing I like having in my home theater, it's more ambient light shining on my screen. Reply
  • r3loaded - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    8K for the Olympics may be cool and all, but 4K@120Hz or even just 4K@60Hz would be far more useful for fast motion sports. Reply
  • TheUnhandledException - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    Exactly. Hell 1080p@120 would be amazing for sports. However higher resolution is easier to market so everything is sacrificed at the altar of resolution. Reply
  • PVG - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    If only the networks focused on offering 1080p streams that are not over compressed garbage (let alone 4K ones) instead of this 8K nonsense.
    "I need to see the olympics in 8K" said no one, ever.
    "I'd like to see what's going on in the black and brown smeers" said A LOT of people, , on S8 E3 of Game of Thrones (as an example)...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now