System Performance

Intel’s Coffee Lake is a nice upgrade, offering up to six cores in the 45-Watt H series, compared to four in Kaby Lake. MSI offers either the Core i7-8750H, Core i7-8850H, or the Core i9-8950HK, with the latter installed in the review unit. The Core i9-8950HK offers six cores, 12 threads, and a 2.9-4.8 GHz operating window at stock speeds. There’s 12 MB of cache, and of course the 45-Watt TDP.

The review unit also comes with 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2667, and there’s two more SODIMM slots if you need more memory than that. The base models come with just a single 16 GB stick, so while you do lose out on the dual-channel memory, it’s nice that if you do want to upgrade to 32 GB of memory, you don’t need to buy two sticks of memory.

To test system performance, the GT75 Titan was run through our standard laptop tests. Comparisons are against similar systems and a few others, but if you want to compare it to any laptop we’ve tested, you can use our online Bench.

PCMark

PCMark 8 - Home

PCMark 8 - Creative

PCMark 8 - Work

PCMark 10 - Essentials

PCMark 10 - Productivity

PCMark 10 - Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 - Overall

PCMark tests all aspects of a system, including the CPU, GPU, and storage. The extra cores in the GT75 Titan help propel it to the tops of these tests, even compared to the Clevo P870DM2 with it’s desktop class Core i7-6700K CPU.

Cinebench

Cinebench R15 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench is a pure CPU test, and with both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests, we can take a look at both the single-core performance as well as when all six cores and twelve threads are in use. With a maximum turbo frequency of 4.8 GHz, the Core i9-8950HK pulls out a nice lead on the single-threaded result, and the extra cores absolutely demolish the quad-cores in previous laptops.

x264

x264 HD 5.x

x264 HD 5.x

Another CPU test, x264 does a video conversion over two passes. The workload is quite long, and on Ultrabooks it can bump into the thermal limits of a device, but on these desktop replacement systems that’s not an issue. The MSI GT75 Titan once again flexes its extra two cores here and wipes the floor against even the fastest quad-core models we’ve tested.

Web Tests

All of our web tests are done with the latest version of Microsoft Edge, and unlike our other tests, web performance is often dictated by the browser. Over time, browsers tend to get faster at certain tasks, so even the same device may show different results later in its life.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Google Octane 2.0

WebXPRT 2015

Interestingly, the Kraken 1.1 and Octane results are a bit lower for this laptop compared to some of the previous generation devices we’ve tested. However the WebXPRT results do show an improvement. At the end of the day, laptops with H series CPUs tend to not struggle with web workloads regardless.

Storage Performance

You can get the GT75 Titan with just a 1 TB 7200 rpm drive, or MSI offers models with 256 and 512 GB SATA SSDs, and models with either a single 512 GB NVMe, or two 512 GB NVMe in RAID. There’s three total M.2 slots, so after purchase, there’s room to upgrade as well. It’s nice that all models come with the 1 TB spinning drive though, since the install size for games these days can be well over 100 GB per game.

As enthusiasts, it can be a bit disheartening that SSDs have become commodities for laptop manufacturers, but that is certainly the case. The review unit we received from MSI ships with the Samsung PM981 512 GB SSD. This 64-layer TLC drive is one of the best performing TLC drives around, and if you want to read more about it please check out our review.

The Samsung PM981 is perhaps not quite as fast as their Pro series with MLC NAND, but for most people, the speed difference is mostly academic. The PM981 can saturate a PCI 3.0 x4 link on reads, and still does awfully well on writes.

SSDs in laptops is a bit of a lottery, but this GT75 Titan has a great SSD. They offer this in RAID 0 as well for 1 TB total, which is going to perform marginally better, but likely not enough for anyone to really notice except on synthetic tests.

Design GPU Performance
POST A COMMENT

47 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    At least on high end laptops like this one, I'd be interested in seeing 1440p/4k results when possible. Yes, for most titles that's still going to be an aspirational target, for another year or two; but with current high end GPUs being overkill for 1080p seeing how much farther you can push is useful; and 2080SLI (when supported) and the upcoming 7nm generation will likely be able to hit acceptable framerates in at least some titles and being able to look back against the prior generation will be beneficial. Reply
  • darkich - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    I find it beyond ridiculous that you're actually fine with a 1080p TN with this screen size and this GPU, for this price in this day and age!

    Can someone please explain..why would anyone need hulking 1080p POS if there are many laptops that are less than half lighter, far sleeker, cost half the price and can play EVERY game at 1080p 60fps?!?
    Reply
  • darkich - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    ..heck, excuse me but I have to straight up say that anyone buying this with a 1080p screen is a total idiot, sorry.
    Just see no point.
    Reply
  • darkich - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    ..oh and also, why are you ignoring the fact that not being able to play at 4K 60fps is NOT an excuse for not having a 4K screen??
    Is it that complicated to lower the resolution in the game settings??
    Reply
  • npz - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    I'd get the 1080p screen. I do NOT want to scale. Period.

    The TN panel has a wide viewing angle at 120 deg, good color gamut 94%NTSC and good accuracy (see the display tests) and can do 120hz with 3ms latency, much better than the 4k panel.
    Reply
  • Death666Angel - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    All I see here is a reference to the horizontal viewing angles ("..turn your head slightly..."). That's never been an issue with my TN panels (HP w2408h and some notebooks). The vertical angles are usually crap. It's often tough to get a uniform picture on 24"+ monitors. It's not as bad on laptops, but even my 14" notebook had issues with it. If I were to believe that vertical viewing angles are just as good they'd need to be specifically mentioned, ideally with pictures like notebookcheck and prad.de do. And IPS panels have developed 120Hz+ capabilities as well. :) Reply
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    If you can't see the point of a 120 Hz display versus a 60 Hz display then I don't think anyone will be able to help you. Reply
  • darkich - Friday, September 14, 2018 - link

    Fair enough.
    I'd still take a far more quality and detailed image on a 17" over grainy 120Hz any day
    Reply
  • Brett Howse - Friday, September 14, 2018 - link

    Well if you really are interested in this laptop but the 1920x1080 is holding you back, they do have a 3840x2160 IPS with G-Sync as well. Reply
  • darkich - Sunday, September 16, 2018 - link

    Soo..that brings us back to my initial point, right?
    Why are you wasting your time on this 20 year old screen specs then?
    Why aren't you reviewing the said IPS option instead ?
    Benchmarking this laptop would only make sense at at least 1440p and with a screen that can actually showcase games in their full glory.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now