System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Corsair HX 750 power supply. This power supply is Platinum rated. As I am in the US on a 120 V supply, leads to ~87% efficiency > 75W, and 92%+ efficiency at 375W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The Xeon-W 2155 used is an i9-7900X in Xeon form. The clock speeds and boosts are all the same. To that end, we should see similar results on the X299 based motherboards as we do on this C422 based board with a Xeon-W CPU. To that end, the power consumption numbers using this combination were the best we have seen in the idle tests at a power-sipping 54W and 59W in long idle and OS idle respectively. Loaded power consumption was also on the lower side hitting 198W while most others were well above 200W.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 10 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.

Non UEFI POST Time

POST times for the C422 based board will be noticeable longer compared to X299 boards in this segment. To that end, the X11SRA booted in 1m23 by default, and with disabling many controllers, etc, shaved the time off considerably to 1m09. Compared to X299 the board has more training and other items to bring up during POST. 

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds. 

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

Our DPC Latency results don't show anything extraordinary here. While the X11SRA did come back with the slowest result, it is still under the magic 300µs value. When plugging a speaker in and playing audio, we did not catch any hitching or audio issues. 

Benchmark Overview CPU Performance: Short Form
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • tricomp - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    No Ryzen to buy Intel
  • Psycho_McCrazy - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    So many X299 mobo reviews and now a WS one, so niche.
    Spare a thought for us mortals looking for AM4 B350 boards. Mini ITX AM4 mobo reviews anyone?
  • ruthan - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Gaming charts are almost useless for me, i want to see comparision with 7820x and 8700K.. I now that gaming performance wouldnt be better, but not everybody have enough money and room for separated gaming and working PC..
  • bill.rookard - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Well, that sucks. It used to be that you could buy some regular boards, and eventually through server replacements get a hold of Xeons on the secondary used market. These are actually quite useful, and decently powerful.

    Now, server motherboards and chipsets will be required. Grr....
  • Sartorial - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Does it support bifurcating / "quadfurcating" PCI-E slots for passive M.2 risers?
  • cinematicket - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    New points are continually giving new learning.So as a reader this is very informative and intreseting topic.
    https://bookbyq.com/
  • porcusRex - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    im in the market for a new workstation. I would like to see this motherboard compared to the Asus WS C422 pro/se. build will be used for developement/db work and to run VMs. plan is for 128 g memory and xeon w-2155. the only other available board only supports 64 G memory i think.
  • stanbessami - Thursday, December 6, 2018 - link

    Excellent scalability, full support for the Broadwell-EP family up to E5-2699 v4 from BIOS 2.0. There are all modern and really necessary connectors. Technical support manufacturer, fresh bios.
    All stores indicate in the description that the memory is only ECC REG, but this is not the case, it works fine with regular 2133 boards. Really effective energy saving options specified in the specification. Power, reliability, a decent manufacturer in its segment "SUPERMICRO". Price = quality. By the way, I write argumentative essays and reviews for https://writemyessayonline.com/, where you will also find a lot of useful information, as well as be able to order any paperwork.
  • hansmuff - Monday, March 25, 2019 - link

    Maybe IPMI isn't a requirement in a workstation class board, but it sure would be nice especially at this price. My X10 Supermicro server board was only about $220 and has IPMI. It would be a nice distinguisher in this space.
  • charliejoe752 - Tuesday, July 16, 2019 - link

    Hey, Thanks for sharing, very useful information about the chipset technology. I provide the students with essay help online(https://www.assignmenthelp4me.com/essay-help.html)... I am presently working with Assignment Help 4 Me, the website that is best among all the service providers and has 100% customer satisfaction.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now