It’s been a while since we’ve last seen a new workstation graphics card from AMD. With their Fiji GPU not being a good fit for the market, the company hasn’t had a significant update of the lineup since 2014, when Tonga was introduced into the mix. However as part of their SIGGRAPH 2016 professional graphics event, AMD is giving their professional card lineup a proper update and then some.

Announced Monday night, the company is introducing 3 new cards under their new Radeon Pro WX family, the WX 7100, WX 5100, and WX 4100. Powered by the AMD’s new Polaris family of GPUs, AMD is looking to bring the architecture’s power efficiency and display controller improvements to their workstation users. As this is based on the Polaris 10 and Polaris 11 GPUs, like their consumer desktop counterparts, AMD is targeting the bread-and-butter workstation market with their latest wares, in this case meaning the sub-$1000 market.

AMD Workstation Video Card Specification Comparison
  WX 7100 W7100 WX 5100 WX 4100
Stream Processors 2304 1792 1792 1024
Texture Units 144 112 112 64
ROPs 32 32 32 16
Boost Clock 1243MHz 920MHz >1.2GHz >975MHz
Memory Clock 7Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5 ? ?
Memory Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 128-bit
VRAM 8GB 8GB 8GB 4GB
TDP 150W? 150W ? ?
GPU Polaris 10 Tonga Polaris 10 Polaris 11
Architecture Polaris GCN 1.2 Polaris Polaris
Manufacturing Process GloFo 14nm TSMC 28nm GloFo 14nm GloFo 14nm
Launch Date Q4 2016 08/2014 Q4 2016 Q4 2016
Launch Price (MSRP) <$1000 N/A TBA TBA

Branding aside (more on that later today), the Radeon Pro WX series is essentially a continuation of AMD’s existing FirePro W series lineup and the traditional workstation market it targets. To that end the new Radeon Pro WX cards are retaining the FirePro W series numbering system, indicating which card/tier they are a replacement of.

At the top of the new Radeon Pro WX stack is the WX 7100. The successor to the Tonga based W7100, this is based on AMD’s leading Polaris 10 GPU. Relative to its predecessor then, it should offer a decent performance boost, combining a slightly larger number of SPs with higher clockspeeds. AMD has disclosed that the card will ship with 2304 SPs (36 CUs), which is a fully enabled Polaris 10 GPU, making this very similar to the consumer RX 480. Meanwhile specific clockspeeds have not been revealed, but given AMD’s 5 TFLOPs minimum, this puts the boost clock at no lower than 1.08GHz.

On the memory side the card will be shipping with 8GB of GDDR5 attached to a 256-bit bus. Clockspeeds have not been disclosed, but the consumer counterpart to this card, Radeon RX 480, used 8Gbps chips, so I’d expect at least 7 for the workstation card. I am a bit surprised that AMD opted to go with just 8GB of memory here – Polaris 10 should be able to support 16GB – but given the price goal and the target market, it makes sense.

On the TDP front I’m still waiting for AMD to post the full specifications of the card. But it’s a very safe bet it’s a 150W card given the GPU configuration and the fact that its predecessor hit the same power target. Speaking of which, like W7100 before it, this is a single slot, full profile card. AMD has once again given the card 4 DisplayPort outputs, this time capable of the newest DisplayPort 1.4 standard.

WX 5100

The second of the new WX trio is the WX 5100. Also based on the Polaris 10 GPU, this card opts for a lower balance of price, performance, and power consumption.  This replaces the Bonaire based W5100, and comes with 1792 SPs (28 CUs) enabled, and a clockspeed that will be at least 1.2GHz. Compared to its predecessor it should be massively faster as AMD has more than doubled the number of SPs, not to mention the clockspeed boost.

Attached to the GPU will be 8GB of GDDR5 memory over a 256-bit bus. Like the RX 7100 AMD has not disclosed memory frequencies here, though I’m going to be surprised if it’s as high as its bigger sibling since it needs to be a cheaper and lower power card. On that note TDPs are not available either; W5100 was a 75W card, but given the use of a mostly enabled Polaris 10, I’m not sure that’ll be the case here. RX 5100 is essentially a second-tier to 7100, which is something that did not exist in the previous FirePro generation.

In terms of build we’re looking at a card that takes a cue from its predecessor, utilizing a single wide, full profile, but overall relatively short card design. AMD is aiming for continuity with the previous generation in their card designs, so WX 5100 should be a drop-in replacement in that respect.

WX 4100

Last but not least we have the WX 4100. This replaces the W4300 as the low performance member of the workstation card family. As you might expect from such a description, this is based on AMD’s forthcoming Polaris 11 GPU, which so far we haven’t seen yet, but we’re told is aggressively power optimized. In terms of underlying hardware we’re looking at a fully enabled Polaris 11 GPU, with 1024 SPs (16 CUs), clocked at no less than 975MHz boost. Relative to its predecessor it should deliver a good performance boost, with 33% more SPs and a modest clockspeed bump.

With regards to memory, we’re looking at 4GB of GDDR5 attached via a 128-bit bus. Memory clockspeeds have not been disclosed. For that matter neither has TDP, but given that this is a Polaris 11 card meant to replace the W4300, it’s a very safe bet that this is a sub-75W card.

For design we’re looking at the only low profile member of the new WX family. The card utilizes a single wide cooler design and is outfit with mini-DisplayPorts in order to get 4 of them on a single low profile card.

Polaris Architecture & Card Availability

While the immediate performance and power efficiency gains afforded by AMD’s Polaris architecture are going to be the biggest piece of news here, Polaris brings other new functionality to the table as well. For the professional graphics market and FirePro/Radeon Pro users, these should be some very welcome changes.

When it comes to the display controller, Polaris represents a big step up from AMD’s prior generation architectures. DisplayPort 1.4 is now supported, which means that these cards can be used to drive 5K monitors via a single port, allowing up to 4 of such monitors to be driven per card. Meanwhile this also brings full and formal support for HDR and its many requirements (e.g. HDR metadata), which should be a boon for media users, especially now that HDR monitors are hitting the market. And though it’s not directly exposed on the new WX cards since all of them use DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0b is also supported, which again for media users should be useful for when they need to work specifically with HDMI displays/TVs via an adapter.

Along those lines, Polaris also introduces AMD’s new video encode and decode block.  This marks the first time that HEVC decode and encode have been available on a FirePro workstation card, This once again is another media-centric feature in the pro graphics workspace, as it allows for much better (and faster) support for HEVC content, including of course HDR content.

Finally, getting back to AMD’s Radeon Pro reformation, among the other changes AMD has announced is that they have significantly extended the warranty period for these new Radeon Pro WX cards. Whereas the older FirePro cards had a 3 year warranty, these new cards come with a 10 year warranty. Looking at the fine print in AMD’s announcement, this is compared of a 3 year warranty plus a 7 year extended warranty. I suspect this means that support after 3 years is more limited (e.g. possibly only hardware support and critical security fixes), but we’ll see what AMD has to say. But to put this in perspective, if you went back 10 years from now, this would mean AMD would still be supporting their ancient DX9-era R500-based FireGL 7300.Raja Koduri quipped that he’s never heard of anyone using a workstation card for 10 years, and I don’t doubt he’s right.

Wrapping things up, the new Radeon Pro WX series cards will be released in Q4 of this year. AMD has not announced pricing at this time beyond the fact that the entire lineup will be under $1000. Pricing will be released closer to launch, though as AMD themselves have noted, most of their sales are via preconfigured OEM workstations, so the bulk of their customers will never buy a card directly to begin with. In any case, AMD’s regular OEM partners such as HP have already announced their support, so we should be seeing WX-equipped workstations show up in Q4 as well.

Source: AMD

POST A COMMENT

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • outlw6669 - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    Did anyone else notice that the WX 4100 is a PCIe 8x card?
    I highly doubt there will be a performance impact due to this decision, but I bet there will be a BOM impact.
    Smart thinking AMD!
    Reply
  • ddriver - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    AMD's guide to making a "professional" product - lower clock speed, disable shader cores, jack up the price. Reply
  • testbug00 - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    you mean the exact same as Nvidia. Except the price isn't jacked up as high? Reply
  • ddriver - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    It might be for those quadro's nvidia released recently, but if you look at their entire portfolio, they actually have products which are different silicon, that is NOT crippled in terms of FP64 performance, uses ECC memory and MORE of it and all that good stuff.

    And hey, if I wanted to say "nvidia is better" that's what I would have said straight away. Have people become so dim that any criticism for AMD is automatically interpreted as nvidia promotion?

    And surely, nvidia PRO product's value is even worse than that of AMD, not because AMD are saints, but because they are forced in a position to be more giving. There is nothing AMD would like more than to be able to afford to be as nvidia ;)
    Reply
  • extide - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    It's the same silicon (for both vendors) but sometimes yeah the FP64 stuff is fused off in a Geforce, but not a Quadro, and AMD does it also -- Hawaii based Radeon is 1/8th FP64, while Firepro was 1/2 or 1/4, (I can't remember) Reply
  • catavalon21 - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    It may not be "fused off" in a Quadro, but it's severely limited. P5000 and P6000 FP64 are reported to be a meager 1/32 of FP32. If the PRO cards aren't getting decent double precision, is there anything that does?

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10516/nvidia-announc...
    Reply
  • outlw6669 - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    Erm, this is how all Pro cards are; red or green.

    Lower clock speeds for stability, higher price to offset extra software optimizations and lower volume.
    Disabling shaders allow both companies to hit lower power targets while using higher voltage (to ensure rock solid stability) when compared to their consumer brethren.
    Reply
  • Geranium - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    At lest they have higher FP16 performance then those new $5000 Quadro. And if I am not wrong those Quadro has less FP16 performance than most highend SoC class gpus. Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    Good catch. From leaked pictures it looks like the same is true of the RX460. Even halo cards rarely take more than a 1 or 2% hit from an x8 slot so the performance impact on a low end card like this should be negligible. OTOH assuming Polaris 11 was also intended to try and recover marketshare in the laptop market being able to knock a watt or two off of idle operating load by cutting the number of PCIe lanes would be a decent bump to battery life. Reply
  • ddriver - Tuesday, July 26, 2016 - link

    Might have been a good idea to also make it shorter so it can actually fit in regular x8 slots which are not cut in the end. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now