Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. With Crysis 3, Crytek has gone back to trying to kill computers and still holds the “most punishing shooter” title in our benchmark suite. Only in a handful of setups can we even run Crysis 3 at its highest (Very High) settings, and that’s still without AA. Crysis 1 was an excellent template for the kind of performance required to drive games for the next few years, and Crysis 3 looks to be much the same for 2015.

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 1920x1080 - High Quality + FXAA

Not unlike Battlefield 4, Crysis 3 sees the R9 380X struggle to keep ahead of the GTX 960, and for that matter even the R9 380. In this case the additional shading and texturing resources just don’t do much for the card; it’s being bottlenecked elsewhere by other resources such as ROPs or geometry, as evidenced by the fact that the performance gain from overclock on the ASUS card is greater than the difference between the R9 380 and R9 380X. Unfortunately this also means that at 1080p even the ASUS card falls just short of the GTX 960.

Battlefield 4 Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor
Comments Locked

101 Comments

View All Comments

  • Faultline1 - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    What causes the 390 to be below the 380s in the Vantage Pixel fill benchmark test?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now