GRID Autosport

For the racing game in our benchmark suite we have Codemasters’ GRID Autosport. Codemasters continues to set the bar for graphical fidelity in racing games, delivering realistic looking environments layered with additional graphical effects. Based on their in-house EGO engine, GRID Autosport includes a DirectCompute based advanced lighting system in its highest quality settings, which incurs a significant performance penalty on lower-end cards but does a good job of emulating more realistic lighting within the game world.

GRID Autosport - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

GRID Autosport - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

With GRID: Autosport we’re back to a close race between the R9 380X and the GTX 960. This is a game where the R9 380 and GTX 960 were virtually tied to begin with, so the additional CUs put the R9 380X over the edge. At the same time however the additional CUs only buy the card a 5% performance advantage over the R9 380, so for AMD it’s not as large of a lead over the GTX 960 as they’d like to see.

On a side note, when testing cards for this article we discovered that AMD has finally fixed their driver bottleneck on this game. So cards like the R9 390 can do better than 80fps and take better advantage of what the latest crop of 144Hz Freesync monitors can offer.

Total War: Attila Grand Theft Auto V
Comments Locked

101 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kalessian - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    The Crysis 3 numbers don't make sense to me, vsync get left on or something?
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Nope. V-sync is off, and I can vouch that the instantaneous framerate does go over 60fps. That's just an amusing case of cards at this performance segment coming very close to averaging 60fps.
  • DanNeely - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    For the price matchup table on the first page, the 4GB 960 starts at $220 vs $180 for the 2gb model. NVidia might not be splitting them apart by model number; but pricewise it has cards at both slots.
  • tviceman - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Current cheapest 4gb GTX 960 on newegg (USA) is $180 w/o rebates. Next cheapest is $185 w/ additional $20 MIR. Next cheapest is $199 w/o rebate. Next cheapest is $210.

    There are plenty of 4gb GTX 960 cards for much less than $220.
  • nathanddrews - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    So... how much longer is AMD going to pretend that HDMI 2.0 doesn't exist? DP adapters are still MIA.
  • extide - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Next gen GPU's dude...
  • medi03 - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Cause dat 4k resolution is golden on card that can barely push 1440p...
  • nathanddrews - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Irrelevant:
    1. Most 4K TVs that can do 4K60 4:4:4 over HDMI 2.0 can also do 1080p120, native input.
    2. Games like Dota 2, LoL, and nearly all games prior to 2013 can be play 4K no problem by GPUs like this.
    3. 4K60 video (YouTube, GameStream, etc.)
  • SpartyOn - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    This card is no better, and actually probably worse, than my three year old GTX 770 4GB and at best is equal to a GTX 960, which can be had for easily under $200.

    Is AMD even trying anymore?
  • looncraz - Monday, November 23, 2015 - link

    Did you read the same review I did?

    The 380X is often 15% faster than the 960, and sometimes 30% faster... for average FPS. When it comes to the 99th percentile or minimum framerates there's just no comparison, 380x lays the smackdown on the 960.

    Sometimes the 960 can do quite well, but it usually loses by quite a bit.

    Your 770 is slower than the 960in some games, a bit faster in others. It is not as fast as the 380x, which is the same approximate performance of AMD's old 7970, which is a nearly four year old card.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now