Smart Keyboard

The other half of what makes the iPad Pro worth talking about is the Smart Keyboard. For those that are unfamiliar with how this keyboard works, in essence it’s really a flip cover that happens to hide a keyboard inside of it. This is yet another thing I mentioned that the iPad really needed to improve its potential as a productivity tool.

I’m going to go ahead and spoil this section by saying that while the Smart Keyboard is worthwhile if you’re typing out more than a paragraph, this feels like one of the clunkier aspects of the iPad Pro.

However, the important question is how I got to that conclusion. Going over the user experience of the keyboard is a pretty simple matter. Attaching the cover to the tablet works the same way it always does, which is accomplished by placing the edge of the cover onto the edge of the tablet which also contains the Smart Connector. There are some strong magnets that help with alignment here, and provide the positive pressure needed to ensure that the data and power pins of the Smart Connector are firmly connected to the keyboard.

Once the cover is connected, setting up the keyboard is done by folding it out and doing some origami until the tablet is docked into the right place on the keyboard, which has a noticeable notch to it. Aligning this despite the strong magnets does take some work, as it seems that unless the cover is setup correctly the keyboard isn’t enabled at all.

If you’re trying for precision, I would say that there’s roughly a 4-5 second time delay from the moment that you decide that you need to use the keyboard to actually using it. In addition to this time delay, the keyboard is rather precarious and is basically only stable when you’re using it on a table. While gravity can keep the whole setup somewhat stable on your lap when the display is leaning backwards, if the display starts leaning forwards there’s really nothing stopping it from collapsing and detaching from the cover, as while the magnets are strong enough to hold the tablet in a static state, they aren’t strong enough to hold the tablet if there’s the additional force of decelerating the tablet as it falls. As a result, the angles that the keyboard and tablet can hold relative to each other is fixed.

To be fair, once the keyboard is set up and it’s in a stable position, typing on the tablet is a great experience. The Surface Pro 3 was decent in my experience, but the touchpad with its lack of strong palm rejection made for some frustrating experiences. In this respect, the iPad Pro does a lot better, to the extent that I didn’t have any trouble doing things like typing up long forum posts or various sections of this review. Key travel is short, but there’s good haptic feedback and the layout of the keyboard doesn’t have any strange issues that seem to happen so often to so many tablet keyboards. Something like the Pixel C just doesn’t even compare here, especially because due to the use of Bluetooth it’s absolutely useless in an apartment or any remotely dense environment where the 2.4 GHz spectrum is crowded to the point that it approaches being unusable.

However, despite this significant setup time for the keyboard cover, pretty much the only value for the keyboard cover is text input. Due to the ergonomics of a near-vertical touch screen it’s really not something that can be used for extended periods of time as once you’re done with text input to comfortably use the touch screen you really need to break down the keyboard and revert it back to a simple tablet.

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the conundrum of the keyboard when it comes to these tablets, and honestly I don’t think anyone has figured out the right way of doing things yet. I think the Pixel C in form is a step in the right direction, but the execution is unfortunate to say the least. The iPad Pro touchscreen keyboard has the size to allow for touch typing, but the utter lack of position feedback makes it difficult to know where to keep your hands and because touching the display means inputting a character it’s necessary to awkwardly keep your hands right above the glass of the display. The heart of the issue here is that it’s necessary to have an input method where it’s easy to keep your fingers resting on the home row of the keyboard, with clear haptic feedback for input and some indication of where the keys are. It’s also necessary to make sure that this keyboard is easily accessible when it’s needed but quickly stowed away when it isn’t.

I can’t help but wonder whether the better solution here would be something like Lenovo’s Yoga Pro design, but with a different method of execution. Instead of making the two halves a single unit, the keyboard portion should be easily and quickly detached with the smart connector held within the hinge. Rather than a traditional laptop keyboard, something more like the current Smart Keyboard would make a lot of sense. However, I suspect that in doing this a traditional flip cover would no longer make sense as the keyboard would really become an integral part of the user experience once properly integrated. We can talk about how touch-only is a faster and more convenient experience, but this really only applies to navigation as while I can type at about 40 words per minute without issue on a phone or tablet trying to reach 100 words per minute is hard to say the least.

Overall, I should make it clear that the iPad Pro’s Smart Keyboard is not a bad keyboard by any means. When I’m able to just focus on typing, the user experience far exceeds pretty much anything else I’ve tried in the industry. The problem is that as the Smart Keyboard starts to approach the point where I can actually use it, I start to really notice all of the flaws that the implementation has. In this case, the two major issues that really need to be solved here are speed to deploy/stow and lap stability. While a lot has been made of the iPad Pro’s inability to have adjustable viewing angles realistically it only needs two viewing angles, similar to how the Smart Cover only has two viewing angles. If the Smart Keyboard can feel like it appears and disappears almost instantly and can be used without a table effectively, it would probably be the ideal solution to the keyboard problem that tablets face.

Apple Pencil Software UX
Comments Locked

408 Comments

View All Comments

  • rabastens23 - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Exactly. The hardware was never the issue or shortcoming, software is - however most reviewers conveniently ignore that.
  • Qwertilot - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Well, its a good bit better off than the Pixel C software wise - there is at least a very large ecosystem actively built around 10" tablets, and adapting in places for larger ones. Very good indeed for some end user use cases.
  • Relic74 - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Yea see. I have both the Pixel C and iPad Pro and the thing is, I'm running the same apps on both platforms. I have MS Office, I have Art Rage, I have the entire Adobe app collection, I have Flipboard, Pinterest, Feedly and all of those apps. The only thing I don't have is the music creation stuff. I use the Pixel C for my productive stuff because it's just better geared for it, especially that it has an actually file-system, dealing with files is 10x better. The iPad Pro is for media consumption and other leisure activities. I just couldn't get pass iOS, to many restrictions for me to use it as a work machine. Well that and I couldn't even connect the iPad Pro to my works network, no Open ID or multiple user support.
  • londiste - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    why no direct comparison against surface pro? i believe anandtech did a review on surface pro 4 recently, so it shouldn't be too difficult. roughly the same size and weight, roughly the same price (for core m3 anyway, against which ipad pro kindla holds its own). clearly these two are marketed against each other, whether you consider surface pros to be in their own little niche.
  • Relic74 - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Different platforms all together, plus, one is running a desktop OS, the other a mobile OS. They really shouldn't be compared, no Professional is going to buy an iPad Pro to use as a laptop and no one is going to buy the Surface Pro to use as a tablet. At least no one who has half a brain that is.
  • Michael Wilding - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Kudos to everyone who wrote this article. It's the most comprehensive iPad Pro review on the net.
  • lucam - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Sure but it took 3 months to get it out....
    I have read many others on the net and this review doesn't say anything new to me apart a bit of X86 vs ARM
  • wolfemane - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    You just don't quit. Every article in the past 3 months has a post from you, "Ipad pro review, where is it?" and then you state it has nothing new than other reviews had. What the hell did you expect?
  • lucam - Sunday, January 24, 2016 - link

    Glad you have noticed that. You are right it's not worth it.
  • akdj - Tuesday, January 26, 2016 - link

    @lucam, maybe to YOU --- but for those of us that appreciate real world use, in depth testing and even 'subjective' comparisons using the device in the real world -- you better believe it's WORTH IT! And apparently not just worth it to me but about 300 other comments from folks also interested in with it or beating it up.

    To the crew @ Anand, keep up the excellent work and realize ignorance like I'm responding to is just that. We don't need reviews earlier. The 'wait' is cool because of the payoff with your reviews.
    Unreal. Go find another site lucam! This one ain't for you. Period. WAY Over YOUR Head!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now