Smart Keyboard

The other half of what makes the iPad Pro worth talking about is the Smart Keyboard. For those that are unfamiliar with how this keyboard works, in essence it’s really a flip cover that happens to hide a keyboard inside of it. This is yet another thing I mentioned that the iPad really needed to improve its potential as a productivity tool.

I’m going to go ahead and spoil this section by saying that while the Smart Keyboard is worthwhile if you’re typing out more than a paragraph, this feels like one of the clunkier aspects of the iPad Pro.

However, the important question is how I got to that conclusion. Going over the user experience of the keyboard is a pretty simple matter. Attaching the cover to the tablet works the same way it always does, which is accomplished by placing the edge of the cover onto the edge of the tablet which also contains the Smart Connector. There are some strong magnets that help with alignment here, and provide the positive pressure needed to ensure that the data and power pins of the Smart Connector are firmly connected to the keyboard.

Once the cover is connected, setting up the keyboard is done by folding it out and doing some origami until the tablet is docked into the right place on the keyboard, which has a noticeable notch to it. Aligning this despite the strong magnets does take some work, as it seems that unless the cover is setup correctly the keyboard isn’t enabled at all.

If you’re trying for precision, I would say that there’s roughly a 4-5 second time delay from the moment that you decide that you need to use the keyboard to actually using it. In addition to this time delay, the keyboard is rather precarious and is basically only stable when you’re using it on a table. While gravity can keep the whole setup somewhat stable on your lap when the display is leaning backwards, if the display starts leaning forwards there’s really nothing stopping it from collapsing and detaching from the cover, as while the magnets are strong enough to hold the tablet in a static state, they aren’t strong enough to hold the tablet if there’s the additional force of decelerating the tablet as it falls. As a result, the angles that the keyboard and tablet can hold relative to each other is fixed.

To be fair, once the keyboard is set up and it’s in a stable position, typing on the tablet is a great experience. The Surface Pro 3 was decent in my experience, but the touchpad with its lack of strong palm rejection made for some frustrating experiences. In this respect, the iPad Pro does a lot better, to the extent that I didn’t have any trouble doing things like typing up long forum posts or various sections of this review. Key travel is short, but there’s good haptic feedback and the layout of the keyboard doesn’t have any strange issues that seem to happen so often to so many tablet keyboards. Something like the Pixel C just doesn’t even compare here, especially because due to the use of Bluetooth it’s absolutely useless in an apartment or any remotely dense environment where the 2.4 GHz spectrum is crowded to the point that it approaches being unusable.

However, despite this significant setup time for the keyboard cover, pretty much the only value for the keyboard cover is text input. Due to the ergonomics of a near-vertical touch screen it’s really not something that can be used for extended periods of time as once you’re done with text input to comfortably use the touch screen you really need to break down the keyboard and revert it back to a simple tablet.

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the conundrum of the keyboard when it comes to these tablets, and honestly I don’t think anyone has figured out the right way of doing things yet. I think the Pixel C in form is a step in the right direction, but the execution is unfortunate to say the least. The iPad Pro touchscreen keyboard has the size to allow for touch typing, but the utter lack of position feedback makes it difficult to know where to keep your hands and because touching the display means inputting a character it’s necessary to awkwardly keep your hands right above the glass of the display. The heart of the issue here is that it’s necessary to have an input method where it’s easy to keep your fingers resting on the home row of the keyboard, with clear haptic feedback for input and some indication of where the keys are. It’s also necessary to make sure that this keyboard is easily accessible when it’s needed but quickly stowed away when it isn’t.

I can’t help but wonder whether the better solution here would be something like Lenovo’s Yoga Pro design, but with a different method of execution. Instead of making the two halves a single unit, the keyboard portion should be easily and quickly detached with the smart connector held within the hinge. Rather than a traditional laptop keyboard, something more like the current Smart Keyboard would make a lot of sense. However, I suspect that in doing this a traditional flip cover would no longer make sense as the keyboard would really become an integral part of the user experience once properly integrated. We can talk about how touch-only is a faster and more convenient experience, but this really only applies to navigation as while I can type at about 40 words per minute without issue on a phone or tablet trying to reach 100 words per minute is hard to say the least.

Overall, I should make it clear that the iPad Pro’s Smart Keyboard is not a bad keyboard by any means. When I’m able to just focus on typing, the user experience far exceeds pretty much anything else I’ve tried in the industry. The problem is that as the Smart Keyboard starts to approach the point where I can actually use it, I start to really notice all of the flaws that the implementation has. In this case, the two major issues that really need to be solved here are speed to deploy/stow and lap stability. While a lot has been made of the iPad Pro’s inability to have adjustable viewing angles realistically it only needs two viewing angles, similar to how the Smart Cover only has two viewing angles. If the Smart Keyboard can feel like it appears and disappears almost instantly and can be used without a table effectively, it would probably be the ideal solution to the keyboard problem that tablets face.

Apple Pencil Software UX
Comments Locked

408 Comments

View All Comments

  • Qwertilot - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Especially for stuff like newspapers and magazines - its an a4 sheet of paper, so everything is the right size :)

    Mine mostly sits on a book stand and does that/internet/bits of TV etc. Exceedingly good for that.
  • Speedfriend - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Why is there no near iPad Air with the A9X. Is it because the TDP is too high? Why do we never see any attempts to measure power for the Apple SOCs? Is it because Apple remove publications from review and press access lists if they attempt to delve too deeply?
  • WorldWithoutMadness - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Watch your back... you delve too deeply.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    "Why do we never see any attempts to measure power for the Apple SOCs?"
    Because it's destructive, which means we can't do it to our review units. We'd need to buy units specifically for it, and even then there's a good chance we'd simply break it due to how difficult it is.

    It's one of those things I'd like to do, but it requires a lot more in the way of resources than you'd otherwise expect.
  • Kevin G - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Perfectly understandable for review units and products just hitting the market. However, I suspect Anandtech has a few drawers full of tablets and phones that are no longer in active use/loaner review units which could be sacrificed for this data. Acquiring older units from the used market would be a cost effective way to get this data too.

    An alternative would be to partner up with a site like iFixit to help split the cost of the hardware. They take it apart and Anandtech would pay for a functional, already disassembled unit.

    The difficult part would simply be getting the time to sit down and so this. :)
  • nathanddrews - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    The foil is strong with this one.
  • name99 - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    We don;t need to resort to crazy conspiracy theories. Some possibilities include:
    - Yields from TSMC on the SoC weren't high enough. Or the variant
    - Apple was worried that even with TSMC and Samsung making A9/A9X, there wasn't enough capacity to make all the SoCs they needed for iPhone AND new iPads, so they limited themselves to just the halo model (which they know will sell in smaller quantities).

    - Apple want the next iPads to have 3D Touch and the screens for that were not ready in quantity. (This is the option I would bet on).

    - Apple want the next iPads to have some other nice new feature (like at least two, perhaps four) speakers and that hardware is not ready in quantity.

    I would not be at all surprised to see Apple release the next gen iPad Air and mini in say March or April (and perhaps to maintain those dates from now forward, to spread demand somewhat throughout the year instead of all peaked in Sept/Oct).
  • khon - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    It's not a "pro" tablet when it only runs mobile software, and there is no possibility of using a mouse or trackpad.

    It's a larger iPad for students to take notes on, or for people who want a bigger screen when they're sitting on the couch.
  • blackcrayon - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    It runs whatever software someone chooses to write for it, within its capabilities.
    What if your profession was doing digital sketches? Talk about narrow-minded.
  • rabastens23 - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    What if you profession goes beyond doing just digital sketches tho? Let's open up that mind and admit the iPad Pro, for all its qualities, doesn't fit most professional needs - if anything, because apps are not available.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now