Software UX

For those that are unfamiliar with our other articles, we reviewed iOS 9 at its release back in September. If you aren’t familiar with what has changed in the move from iOS 8 to iOS 9 I highly recommend reading it as for the most part I have nothing new to say in the context of what was covered in that review. Instead of treading old ground, it’s worth discussing the specific aspects of the user experience that are unique to the iPad Pro.

The first, and perhaps most obvious change is the display size and resolution. While the aspect ratio is the same as the iPad Air, the significantly increased display size and resolution also affects applications. For the most part I haven’t noticed any issues here. However, in some cases there are still applications that haven’t been properly redesigned for the larger display, so they end up simply being purely upscaled versions of applications designed to fit 7.9 and 9.7 inch displays. This tends to look fairly ugly in my opinion but it does work without issue when dealing with backwards compatibility.

In cases where applications are updated to fit the iPad Pro, designs are generally well-executed and take advantage of the additional screen real estate. It’s probably not a surprise to know that most applications fall under this category, but it’s worth mentioning at any rate.

The larger display size also greatly enhances the utility of split-screen multitasking on the iPad Pro, as it’s generally quite useful to be able to run two almost iPad Air-sized apps simultaneously on the iPad Pro. As discussed in the Apple Pencil section of this review, being able to read a PDF and take notes/do problem sets based upon a document opened in Safari is incredibly useful and helps with productivity. There are other applications here to be sure, but I think an education setting was where I found the most value. However, it's worth mentioning that the multitasking UI feels like it isn't really designed for a future where hundreds of applications will occupy the slide-out multitasking menu.

For the most part, iOS is smooth and performant on the iPad Pro. However, there are a few notable cases where I did notice frame drops. For whatever reason, this seems to be basically limited to the Notes application. It seems that as time has gone on it has become increasingly difficult for anyone shipping a mobile OS to make everything smooth all the time, likely a product of their increasing complexity and larger code base.

Overall, I don't have as much to say here. When the only two competing tablet operating systems worth discussing in comparison to iOS are either neglected (Android) or heavily reliant upon legacy applications that really need a mouse and keyboard to be used properly (Windows), iOS stands alone as basically the only touchscreen OS worth using. I don't think the solution to the problem of the keyboard with the iPad Pro means that it needs a touchpad, nor should using both keyboard and touch simultaneously in the deployed mode be the dominant method of interaction. Trying to do the former is basically just emulating a really terrible laptop, while the latter makes for poor ergonomics almost universally.

While it may be appealing to make a tablet that is also a laptop due to the nature of legacy Windows applications, trying to make such a convergence device is a great way to make either a compromised laptop or a compromised tablet. The other half of the functionality is almost never going to be used in practice if my experiences with Surface Pro are anything to go by. Android showed arguably even more promise than iOS as a tablet OS due to its more traditional computer than appliance OS structure, for whatever reason the promise that came with the structure of Android didn't pan out in execution.

As a result, the iPad line stands alone in software, for better or for worse.

Smart Keyboard Camera, Misc.
Comments Locked

408 Comments

View All Comments

  • rabastens23 - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Exactly. The hardware was never the issue or shortcoming, software is - however most reviewers conveniently ignore that.
  • Qwertilot - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Well, its a good bit better off than the Pixel C software wise - there is at least a very large ecosystem actively built around 10" tablets, and adapting in places for larger ones. Very good indeed for some end user use cases.
  • Relic74 - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Yea see. I have both the Pixel C and iPad Pro and the thing is, I'm running the same apps on both platforms. I have MS Office, I have Art Rage, I have the entire Adobe app collection, I have Flipboard, Pinterest, Feedly and all of those apps. The only thing I don't have is the music creation stuff. I use the Pixel C for my productive stuff because it's just better geared for it, especially that it has an actually file-system, dealing with files is 10x better. The iPad Pro is for media consumption and other leisure activities. I just couldn't get pass iOS, to many restrictions for me to use it as a work machine. Well that and I couldn't even connect the iPad Pro to my works network, no Open ID or multiple user support.
  • londiste - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    why no direct comparison against surface pro? i believe anandtech did a review on surface pro 4 recently, so it shouldn't be too difficult. roughly the same size and weight, roughly the same price (for core m3 anyway, against which ipad pro kindla holds its own). clearly these two are marketed against each other, whether you consider surface pros to be in their own little niche.
  • Relic74 - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Different platforms all together, plus, one is running a desktop OS, the other a mobile OS. They really shouldn't be compared, no Professional is going to buy an iPad Pro to use as a laptop and no one is going to buy the Surface Pro to use as a tablet. At least no one who has half a brain that is.
  • Michael Wilding - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Kudos to everyone who wrote this article. It's the most comprehensive iPad Pro review on the net.
  • lucam - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Sure but it took 3 months to get it out....
    I have read many others on the net and this review doesn't say anything new to me apart a bit of X86 vs ARM
  • wolfemane - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    You just don't quit. Every article in the past 3 months has a post from you, "Ipad pro review, where is it?" and then you state it has nothing new than other reviews had. What the hell did you expect?
  • lucam - Sunday, January 24, 2016 - link

    Glad you have noticed that. You are right it's not worth it.
  • akdj - Tuesday, January 26, 2016 - link

    @lucam, maybe to YOU --- but for those of us that appreciate real world use, in depth testing and even 'subjective' comparisons using the device in the real world -- you better believe it's WORTH IT! And apparently not just worth it to me but about 300 other comments from folks also interested in with it or beating it up.

    To the crew @ Anand, keep up the excellent work and realize ignorance like I'm responding to is just that. We don't need reviews earlier. The 'wait' is cool because of the payoff with your reviews.
    Unreal. Go find another site lucam! This one ain't for you. Period. WAY Over YOUR Head!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now