ATTO - Transfer Size vs Performance

ATTO provides a quick and easy test of performance over a range of block sizes, which makes it a good overview of performance. It illustrates quite clearly how performance plateaus as transfer size increases, with reads bumping up against the limits of SATA but writes being limited by the speed of the flash itself.

AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Performance

Any drives that perform transparent compression will perform much worse on this test than the Iometer tests. The SandForce controllers that relied heavily on compression are much less popular (having been largely displaced by controllers from Silicon Motion, Marvell, and Phison), but this in still an important metric to keep in the suite. Many real-world sources of bulk data (such as encoded video) are already heavily compressed and cannot benefit from any attempts at further compression.

Incompressible Sequential Read PerformanceIncompressible Sequential Write Performance

With a freshly-wiped drive and the short duration of the AS-SSD test, the drives perform much closer to their advertised speeds.

Idle Power Consumption & TRIM Validation Final Words
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gigaplex - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    It's unlikely Samsung is holding back, as the phenomenon is affecting all brands.
  • ddriver - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link

    Corporations do price fixing, why not performance fixing.
  • niva - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link

    It is possible to do performance fixing, but not likely in this case. Enterprise hardware should generally concentrate on endurance, probably using different binning and better memory. I'm sure they can beef up the drivers too and optimize for certain loads. In general they'll get the most sales by selling in greater numbers. Artificially limiting performance so they can make more profit margin on some (much smaller quantities) hardware being sold to enterprise doesn't make sense.

    That all being said I guess it is possible.
  • ShieTar - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link

    Yes, there is a DRAM cache. The size of it is listed in the table on the first page of the article.

    Without this, random writes would still be horrible, as overwriting a complete 128KB block whenever the drive is supposed to write down just 4KB leads quickly to the need of reading, deleting & re-writing the blocks, as no unused 128KB-blocks are left.
  • Laststop311 - Tuesday, October 27, 2015 - link

    its just part of how nand cells works. If you need faster speed 3d xpoint is coming to save the day.
  • Per Hansson - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link

    The DRAM cache is not used to cache writes.
    It's large size is mainly for the NAND mapping table.
    If writes where cached in DRAM the performance of 4KB random writes would of course be waaay higher than what it is.
    And quite extreme dataloss would occur in case of power loss.
  • virtualbigd - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    Can you elaborate on your reliability point above, for Samsung?
  • virtualbigd - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    I know about 840 EVO, is there something else?
  • Samus - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I have my reservations over Samsung drives, especially since the 840 EVO, but DAMN.
  • jay401 - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    Hey if you turn that V upside down, you have the first A-NAND SSD. :D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now