Conclusion

The F12C is Streacom's first attempt to stray away from SFF and passively cooled cases, towards the territory of high performance enclosures for advanced PCs. As a company, Streacom has a fair share of experience with aluminum enclosures and the F12C reflects that. It is an exquisitely shaped and finished case, without a single visible flaw. Aesthetics are a subjective matter but we believe that few would not appreciate the elegant simplicity of pure aluminum. Despite its many openings and the very low weight, the mechanical strength of the F12C is remarkable. Its surface is also strongly resistant to fingerprints, stains and scratches, which is very important if the case will be installed in a living room with children or pets roaming about.

A very important feature of the Streacom F12C is the modular internal configuration design. The multipurpose mounting bars attached to rails is an excellent idea that allows unforeseen levels of customization. If we were talking about a large tower case, having such rails across its main panels would result to infinite possible configurations. For the F12C in particular, it definitely is very effective but imperfectly applied. If there is an ATX motherboard in the case, the left side panel rail becomes almost useless, as even a fan will block the motherboard's headers. If the case was just an inch wider, fans or drives could be installed on the left side panel without compatibility issues with ATX motherboards. The 450 mm standard width limit of AV cabinets is what obviously limited Streacom and they wanted to make sure that their design would fit inside all common furniture. This makes the F12C a little too narrow for systems with ATX motherboards, forcing the user to either abandon most of the left rail or select a shorter motherboard instead. Still, if a mATX or ITX motherboard is selected, there is more than plenty of space for radiators, fans, and drives, offering the user some flexibility when choosing components. Finally, the locking mechanism could have been a lot better than a metallic clip.

Despite its very high quality and versatile design, there are two issues with the F12C chassis that may affect users. The first is the omission of any front I/O ports. Getting rid of the 3.5 mm headphone jacks could be justified somehow, but having no front (or side) USB ports limits the usability in a HTPC environment, requiring users to solely use the IR remote route. This is especially true for a case intended for HTPC systems that also offers no option for an optical drive at all. Even if we consider a household that every main storage device is accessible via the network, being unable to attach a simple flash drive or HDD is problematic. The second aspect is of the retail price. The case is not available yet for the North American markets, but a retail price of about $225 (currently 199 EUR in Germany, 166 GBP in the UK) is very steep and definitely not for those with a tight budget. Streacom's pricing means that the case is aimed more at a premium crowd, which certainly highlights the aluminium chassis and lightweight, modular design, but it will be elimated from the non-premium crowd based on price almost immediately.

Streacom designed and produced the F12C chassis obviously hoping to gain a piece of the market consisting of users who want to build very powerful HTPC systems, usually designed to double as gaming machines. Actually, the design and capabilities of the F12C chassis have it leaning more towards gaming machines rather than HTPC systems, limiting the market potential of the case even further. The F12C is aimed towards an admittedly small fraction of the PC market, aimed to users who will not consider the cost too much. The modular mounting system requires a little bit of extra work with a screwdriver, but it offers excellent versatility to those that want to build their own unique designs. However, these users also are very demanding and the F12C has a shortcomings as well. The lack of front USB ports and the inability to use any type of optical media are important issues for HTPC users, but we could imagine that a system integrator might take this chassis and attempt to build a custom machine.

Testing and Results
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • E.Fyll - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Sorry, lost a sentence there.

    You may be right about dB(A)/W (although it does not work quite that way) but it is not useful to provide noise graphs for three specific fans that I chose for a test that was done just for illustrative reasons. If I chose two fans, four fans, or any other fans from the hundreds of the available models, the results would differ. There is no point to provide you with a "dB(A)/W" rating when that will change based on your selection.
  • Landiepete - Wednesday, September 16, 2015 - link

    Caveat. I've used their SFF passive case (8c) in the past. These are rated upto 95W TDP hardware, however, even using 65W TDP, cpu and mobo temperatures crept up to around 60°C, and I wasn't even pushing the hardware very hard.
    Using a 45W TDP unit in it's current incarnation keeps temps generally around 45°C, every once in a while it goes up to 50.

    I also use a SFF an active unit (7C), and, using a 65W TDP unit, it can't keep the unit cool when only the CPU fan is installed. There is not evough room inside the case to use anything but a low profile fan, and it needs help from a small (size limit again) evacuation fan. This works, but the noise at load is quite horrendous.

    So far I have NOT been impressed with Streacom efforts.
  • Wwhat - Wednesday, September 23, 2015 - link

    It doesn't look very attractive to me, but I think a person with some talent doing some slight mods can make it look nice. But default it just looks bad to my eyes.
  • Haravikk - Monday, September 28, 2015 - link

    Interesting, but some very strange decisions here; while I like that there's an option for using the sides as intakes/exhausts, I can't help but feel that the case should still have mounts for a more traditional front to back cooling setup with vents for intake fans at the front, since this is the only side that should be completely clear at all times. The sides and top could easily be obstructed in many HTPC setups, which limits the usefulness of a case that can only be cooled from these sides. While I don't like using the rear panel for exhaust due to the necessarily small fan mounts (once you take up space for PCI slots and I/O), not offering it as an option still seems a glaring mistake.

    Likewise the lack of front USB ports; that limits its usefulness for gaming (nowhere to plug in wired controllers or charge wireless ones) and eliminates a useful means of connecting install media or providing media files that you already have.

    So yeah, as much as I like well made aluminium cases, there are just too many issues with this one to make it really useful IMO.
  • Sertis - Friday, October 9, 2015 - link

    I rather think it's a nice htpc case. I currently use a node 605 and if I had silver components id rather have this. All I need in an htpc is a very good looking case about the same width as my amp and space for a full size vide card. Optical drive? I can rip to my nas from the nas itself or my desktop, or my laptop. Tuner? HD homeruns in the garage. USB in the front is an affront to the senses especially with the blue plastic in 3.0 ports. I just run an active USB repeater cable to a pop up panel in the floor and a coupler into the leg of the coffee tabletable to a popup panel. Htpc controls are via a mce receiver in the back with a harmony ir blaster. Some people just want things to look clean. They should offer 19" rack mount ears to go all the way for custom installs.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now