Conclusion

The F12C is Streacom's first attempt to stray away from SFF and passively cooled cases, towards the territory of high performance enclosures for advanced PCs. As a company, Streacom has a fair share of experience with aluminum enclosures and the F12C reflects that. It is an exquisitely shaped and finished case, without a single visible flaw. Aesthetics are a subjective matter but we believe that few would not appreciate the elegant simplicity of pure aluminum. Despite its many openings and the very low weight, the mechanical strength of the F12C is remarkable. Its surface is also strongly resistant to fingerprints, stains and scratches, which is very important if the case will be installed in a living room with children or pets roaming about.

A very important feature of the Streacom F12C is the modular internal configuration design. The multipurpose mounting bars attached to rails is an excellent idea that allows unforeseen levels of customization. If we were talking about a large tower case, having such rails across its main panels would result to infinite possible configurations. For the F12C in particular, it definitely is very effective but imperfectly applied. If there is an ATX motherboard in the case, the left side panel rail becomes almost useless, as even a fan will block the motherboard's headers. If the case was just an inch wider, fans or drives could be installed on the left side panel without compatibility issues with ATX motherboards. The 450 mm standard width limit of AV cabinets is what obviously limited Streacom and they wanted to make sure that their design would fit inside all common furniture. This makes the F12C a little too narrow for systems with ATX motherboards, forcing the user to either abandon most of the left rail or select a shorter motherboard instead. Still, if a mATX or ITX motherboard is selected, there is more than plenty of space for radiators, fans, and drives, offering the user some flexibility when choosing components. Finally, the locking mechanism could have been a lot better than a metallic clip.

Despite its very high quality and versatile design, there are two issues with the F12C chassis that may affect users. The first is the omission of any front I/O ports. Getting rid of the 3.5 mm headphone jacks could be justified somehow, but having no front (or side) USB ports limits the usability in a HTPC environment, requiring users to solely use the IR remote route. This is especially true for a case intended for HTPC systems that also offers no option for an optical drive at all. Even if we consider a household that every main storage device is accessible via the network, being unable to attach a simple flash drive or HDD is problematic. The second aspect is of the retail price. The case is not available yet for the North American markets, but a retail price of about $225 (currently 199 EUR in Germany, 166 GBP in the UK) is very steep and definitely not for those with a tight budget. Streacom's pricing means that the case is aimed more at a premium crowd, which certainly highlights the aluminium chassis and lightweight, modular design, but it will be elimated from the non-premium crowd based on price almost immediately.

Streacom designed and produced the F12C chassis obviously hoping to gain a piece of the market consisting of users who want to build very powerful HTPC systems, usually designed to double as gaming machines. Actually, the design and capabilities of the F12C chassis have it leaning more towards gaming machines rather than HTPC systems, limiting the market potential of the case even further. The F12C is aimed towards an admittedly small fraction of the PC market, aimed to users who will not consider the cost too much. The modular mounting system requires a little bit of extra work with a screwdriver, but it offers excellent versatility to those that want to build their own unique designs. However, these users also are very demanding and the F12C has a shortcomings as well. The lack of front USB ports and the inability to use any type of optical media are important issues for HTPC users, but we could imagine that a system integrator might take this chassis and attempt to build a custom machine.

Testing and Results
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • RaistlinZ - Monday, September 14, 2015 - link

    A full tower case, put on its side, with ventilation all around...got it.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Not quite.

    "It essentially looks like a typical tower case that has fallen on its side. An aluminum cover shields the expansion card slot screws. Strangely, there are no ventilation or fan openings, even though there is more than enough space of a small exhaust fan."
  • meacupla - Monday, September 14, 2015 - link

    This might have been a decent product, if it were released 10 years ago.

    These days, it's all about compact mITX systems or compact streaming devices, like nVidia Shield.

    Also, IR? really? BT/Wifi remote control is the way to go.
  • Odeen - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    You can always add an internal USB RF remote receiver (Yaocoo makes one) to any case. The problem is that you're stuck with Yaocoo's remote. IR is important if you want to integrate the HTPC into a home theater system with an IR universal remote.

    RF is great, but it's not a solution until there's a universal RF remote
  • nmm - Monday, September 14, 2015 - link

    It drives me nuts when I see fan mounts that block 30%+ of the fan area with mounts intended to be compatible with multiple fan sizes.
    http://images.anandtech.com/doci/9618/manual.jpg
    The design is intended to be versatile, but in the end it just winds up being wasteful in my mind.
  • budabellyx - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Does it also make toast?
  • Jhlot - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    It looks like a toaster in the first picture.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    "The noise of a finalized system will solely depend on the parts chosen by the user. We had to skip directly to our advanced noise testing, exploring the noise dampening capabilities of the case."

    Not good enough. If you're going to claim its temperature performance is such and such, after adding three fans — and compare that performance with other cases — then you need to post the decibel rating.

    Cooling is about decibels per watt... how much noise is generated to cool a specific amount of waste heat. Without the decibel information your review is unfinished.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    It's also a contradiction to say the dust filtration sheets have holes that are too large to effectively capture dust and then praise them for being "very practical".

    Shouldn't a practical dust filter filter the dust?
  • E.Fyll - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    And that's why we had its thermal performance posted without the fans - and compared it. A single sentence, "worse even than the BitFenix Neos", is better than five graphs.

    You may be right about dB(A)/W (although it does not work quite that way) but it is not useful to

    I specifically wrote that the filtration sheets have holes that may be too large to stop small dust particles. That is a lot different than "effectively capture dust". If what you mean by "effectively" is "all of it", then the only filter you should consider is a solid wall.

    Also, "practical" and "efficient" are two vastly different things. And stating that something is practical for a very specific reason is a very long shot from "praising".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now