Professional Performance: Windows

Due to the market positioning of the ThinkStation P900 as an high level workstation with a Quadro professional graphics card, it makes sense to compare the system with industry-standard benchmarks and the other entry level workstations we have previously tested where possible. Benchmarks in this instance come from SPECviewPerf 11, a well-known multi-software test, SYSMark from BAPCo that is used by several industries for comparison, and Linux-Bench for some more scientific and synthetic analysis.

SPECviewPerf 11

SPECviewperf 11 (catia-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (ensight-04)

SPECviewperf 11 (lightwave-01)

SPECviewperf 11 (maya-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (proe-05)

SPECviewperf 11 (sw-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (tcvis-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (snx-01)

Despite having 20 cores and 40 threads in the mix, as well as the highest Quadro we've tested with SPECviewperf, the P900 has a few issues in these benchmarks. Not only does the software package have to be able to cope with a split memory configuration between the two CPUs (a non-unified memory architecture), but the single threaded performance of the system isn't winning any awards. That being said, the ensight section of the benchmark shows good numbers, as well as a few others. Lightwave does take a hit though.

SYSMark 2014

SYSmark 2014 - Office Productivity

SYSmark 2014 - Media Creation

SYSmark 2014 - Data and Financial Analysis

SYSmark 2014 - Overall

SYSmark focuses on several tests, with the office tests being more single threaded compared to the data and financial analysis. As a result the P900 falls behind on the office section, but steams ahead with multi-threaded tests. The overall score puts the top spot with the P900.

System Benchmarks Professional Performance: Linux
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Not sure what ads you're referring to; are you using Adblock Plus? I use A.P. and the viewing is just fine. Who doesn't use Adblock or something similar these days? :)
  • vFunct - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Most people don't use AdBlock because they're unnecessary add ons to a web browser.

    The less add-ons you have, the faster your web experience.
  • pablo906 - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    If you think that browsing the web without adblock and noscript is faster I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
  • MobiusPizza - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    I agree on the annoying Seasonic ad on the left. I use Adblock Plus but I whitelisted Anandtech just to show my support. Anandtech gets ad revenue from my visit even if I don't click on it (sites get revenue based on views not clicks), adblock will deny them of the revenue.
  • centhar - Thursday, May 7, 2015 - link

    I could care less as I block every site I can. If I want to research and/or buy something, I know where to look. I hate ads and logos on everything.
  • Flunk - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    You'll find that more and more people are ignoring ads now. The company I work for keeps tabs on it and the number of non-adblock users is shrinking fast.
  • GTVic - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Or Firefox plus NoScript. Keeps you safe from Javascript attacks and cuts out most of the advertising.
  • bigboxes - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    FF + AdBlock Plus = win
  • Shadowmaster625 - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    What is the point in buying a 2P system when there is obviously a huge bottleneck between the two processors resulting in reduced performance, especially when compared to a 1P system with the same TDP?
  • BillyONeal - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    What 1P system are you aware of that had a 300+ W TDP for the processor?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now