Display

As we briefly discussed in our look at the specifications, the Galaxy S6 line introduces a newer generation of AMOLED displays, which is said to increase maximum luminance to 600 nits. Samsung claims that this was achieved with the use of new materials, which is likely necessary in order to sustain power efficiency improvements. It doesn't seem that AMOLED is uniquely suited to high resolution, but rather that Samsung Display Corp. is managing to dramatically improve how they make AMOLED displays with every year that offset power consumption increases from higher resolution displays.

To find out how Samsung did, we use SpectraCal's CalMAN 5 Ultimate, in addition to X-Rite's i1Pro2 Basic to characterize displays as accurately as possible.

Display - Max Brightness

From the results Samsung's claims of a 600 nit display are valid in this case, which is a 100% APL white display. It's important to note that achieving this requires the use of auto-brightness, and that manual brightness is limited to a much lower brightness to reduce power usage, here the S6 sees similar maximum brightness as the S5. The S6 edge disappointingly only achieves 272 nits in this mode, a rather low value. I saw color balance shift dramatically in auto-boost mode, which suggests that this operating mode is likely less efficient than manual brightness. As an explanation, we've seen that colors are controlled in AMOLED by voltage while brightness is controlled by PWM (pulse width modulation). As with most recent AMOLED displays, there's no DC bias to the pixels so the contrast really is infinite instead of just a very large number when displaying black.

Galaxy S6

Galaxy S6 edge

Display - White Point

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Moving on to grayscale, we can see that Samsung has done a pretty good job of controlling the white point and gamma across the saturation sweep, even if green is slightly dominant in both displays. We can also see that there is variation across displays as the S6 edge is closer to neutral while the S6 sample tends a bit warmer.


Galaxy S6


Galaxy S6 Edge

Display - Saturation Accuracy

In the saturation sweep, both displays do an incredible job. I really don't have anything else to say here, because there's really no way to improve on the level of calibration Samsung has done on this display. Unless Samsung calibrates every single display in production, which is wildly impractical and effectively impossible to do, this is as good as it gets for a mass-produced device. Improving past this point will also be incredibly difficult to perceive, which means there's no real reason to go any further.


Galaxy S6


Galaxy S6 edge

Display - GMB Accuracy

In the Gretag MacBeth ColorChecker, we can get an idea for overall color accuracy, which paints a picture similar to the saturation test. The only real problem I've noticed with these displays are the viewing angles, which can produce color shifting when the display is tilted. This is a bit of an issue on the edge variant as I can see that the edges of the display appear somewhat green when viewed head on, but otherwise there are no real issues to be seen here.

Overall, from a color standpoint it’s looking like Samsung has made one of the best displays available on the market today. Color accuracy is at the point where it’s pretty safe to say that the calibration doesn’t have clear color errors, and the peak brightness of the display is incredibly high. The 1440p resolution helps to compensate for the PenTile subpixel layout so in practice it’s effectively impossible to make out any pixels or the subpixel pattern. The contrast remains infinite as with most modern AMOLED displays, and overall it’s really hard to find any issue with the Galaxy S6’s display at first.

However while the S6 edge seems to be without any issues, the S6 does have some odd display issues that can be seen in direct sunlight as seen in the photo above. To be clear about this the photo above is a simple white screen, which should make the image completely homogeneous but instead there are two visible vertical lines and another jagged horizontal line that appear across the display. Inspection under a light microscope doesn’t really reveal what’s causing this, but the defect is quite visible in practice as seen in the photo above. I suspect that defects are rare, and in any condition other than direct sunlight I can’t see this visual problem.

While trying to see what this kind of defect looked like under a microscope, I also went ahead and took some photos of the subpixel pattern. As far as I can tell, it looks like the green subpixels have a bit more variance than what we’re used to as they tend towards oblong shapes rather than circles, which is likely due to the much tighter pixel density. It seems that this variance may cause some color shifting in certain units, which seems to remain a potential problem with Samsung's AMOLED displays. The pixel fill factor still remains surprisingly low when compared to LCDs, which usually have much higher active area. Due to the subpixel arrangement and some other differences in the display design, color shifting also remains higher than one would expect from LCD displays that are found in phones like the iPhone 6.

The final test that I managed to run on the Galaxy S6 is the brightness vs APL test, which shows the advantage of AMOLED’s emissive nature as it can dynamically increase brightness if the entire display isn’t showing a white screen. As a result, this means that in low APL scenarios like dark movie scenes and app themes it’s possible to see a maximum brightness closer to 700 nits or higher. However, in practice the display’s practical brightness is closer to 600 nits.

Overall, the display is still one of the best on the market, but I would be a bit concerned about fill factor for VR applications as that was a problem on the Note 4. Issues like purple smearing have been resolved, but there are still some problems with the display such as color shifting with changes to viewing angles and some variability in display quality from unit to unit. With this generation I suspect Samsung is either meeting or exceeding the best LCDs in quality, and with the next generation of AMOLED it’s likely that high end smartphones will have to migrate to AMOLED to remain competitive.

Battery Life and Charge Time System Performance
Comments Locked

306 Comments

View All Comments

  • itzraywhy - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    If this isnt the best smartphone android camera in the market what is?
  • sonicmerlin - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    Are you aware that in the COUNTRY benchmarks you mentioned the iPad Air 2 several times but didn't include it in the charts? You even wrote "here we see the Air 2" blah blah except it's not in the chart!
  • sonicmerlin - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    Sorry I meant "CPU" benchmarks. Stupid autocorrect.
  • heartinpiece - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Yup, I also pointed that out a few pages(of comments) back.
    Would be great to see comparisons against the iPad Air 2
  • JoshHo - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 - link

    We're often faced with a dilemma here as inserting comparison devices can lead to a naive reading that we're attempting to directly compare a tablet-class vs smartphone-class SoC when one has a significantly higher TDP. These scores are also available on Bench but we will add them with a note.
  • 3ogdy - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Looking at the phone I can very easily state this is an iPhone by Samsung. Leaving the incredibly stupid decisions (no microSD card slot on a high-end phone) and the stupid ones aside (battery is hard to remove), this is one big piece of sh!t. If I wanted an iSh!t, I would've bought one, Sammy. Let CrApple be CrApple, you Korean copycats. I wouldn't be surprised if the Koreans got a deal with the Americans to have the right to use their design papers. This is nearly identical to an iSh!t - look at the edges, at the way the various antennas were integrades, at the grills, the buttons, the SIM cover and the way to remove it.....THIS IS A CrApple product, not a Samsung one.

    Oh and yes, the SGS5 was ugly as hell and brought nothing new to the table. No progress, no sale. Why would anyone spend money on a phone that's basically the same as its previous generation in terms of tech specs and capabilities, looks a million times worse (including the the version for Gypsies) and costs as if it was a flagship in every possible way?

    I couldn't care less about the decisions taken over at Samsung, but I'd love to see these huge "F**k you, customers!" and middle fingers pointed at us reflected in the product sales.
    Microsoft did the same thing and they woke up and even posted apologies and stating "We listened." big and clear on their front page. They are about to screw things up with that stupid Windows h8 theme in WIndows 10 again...but keeping in mind how late the XP theme came after XP was first introduced, they are still on schedule.
  • nerd1 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Samsung just followed mainstream customers and reviewers (who mostly cared for look and feel), and market seems to quite like sammy's decision.
  • Uplink10 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Leaving MicroSD card slot is not a mainstream decision but a decision out of greed. It is costlier to buy a phone with bigger memory than to stick in a MicroSD card.
  • jet57 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    h265 encode is mentioned as a capability of the SoC, but does the S6 record video using that codec, in any size? I'm very keen for this as I love the idea of 4K video but have reservations over handling gigantic h264 files that could be half the size if they used h265.
  • jasonb16 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    How's voice quality.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now