Final Words

The XPS 13 is a bold move from Dell. High quality build materials, a good keyboard, a good trackpad, and the latest generation Intel Ultrabook processor all inside a chassis with a display that is two sizes too big stuffed into it. Combine that with a 1920x1080 IPS display on the base model, as well as solid state storage as the only option, and you would expect the starting price to be north of $1000. But it is not. The base price, with a Core i3, is just under $800.

The XPS 13 also carries with it amazing battery life, especially on the lower resolution base model. Broadwell-U is part of that, but the display is also a big part of that score, especially on the light battery life test, and Dell would have had to work on the entire package to achieve this kind of battery life result. Any one choice that was a power hog would have dragged the scores down.

Of course no device is perfect and the XPS 13 certainly has some niggling issues which will hopefully be resolved in revisions or updates. The auto-brightness issue is one that they will hopefully address soon. I have no issue with auto-brightness in most cases, but there needs to a way to disable it. Not only can it be frustrating at times when the display is constantly changing brightness, especially in a dim room, but it makes display calibration impossible. If the touch version also had the Yoga style display hinge, it would also increase the capabilities of this device, although that hinge style would be wasted on the non-touch model.

The display is really the one standout feature though. Finally, someone has reduced the bezel size on a laptop. If you are not a fan of smaller laptops, this may not be for you though, since really, it is closer to a typical 11.6 inch model than a 13.3 inch. It would be unbelievable if all laptops were to follow this design pattern, but for now we can hope that at least the premium devices will do so. Dell has opened the door and shown us what is possible, and it looks awesome. The one loser in this scenario is the webcam position, which at the lower left side of the screen is far from ideal. If you are a heavy user of the webcam, this could pose an issue.

Comparing the two models is difficult. On one hand, the FHD model starts at $800 and with the Core i5, bumps up to $900. That is a great starting price for a well-built device like this one, even though the base model has just 4GB of memory. Moving to 8GB means jumping up to $1000. However the move to the excellent high resolution display is yet another $300 on top of that, bringing the least expensive model with touch in at $1300. While I do love the display, and I prefer touch on notebooks, $1300 is getting pretty expensive compared to the original price, and you lose a lot of battery life as well.

Really, it is a great choice to have to make, because neither option is the wrong one. We often lament the lack of options on other laptops, but here Dell let's users decide what they value most: resolution and display quality, or battery life. The only real issue is that you can't get touch with FHD, and you can't get 512GB SSD with the FHD either.

The Dell XPS 13 ends up being responsive, small, light, and well built. Dell has crafted what I am sure most people were hoping for when the original Ultrabook specification was announced. On top of that, they have designed a laptop with class-leading battery life, and plenty of choice to let people buy as little or as much as they need. Considering the competition, this is clearly the Ultrabook of the Broadwell-U generation to beat, and from what we saw at CES it may very well go unchallenged for the remainder of the year.

Battery Life, Speakers, and Noise
Comments Locked

201 Comments

View All Comments

  • icrf - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    How much power does touch circuitry/software consume? I remember first generation touch enabled laptops did rather poorly compared to their non-touch versions.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    These days touch is pretty negligible as I understand it -- maybe 50mW? Obviously tablets and smartphones are able to provide touch and still get great battery life. They have smaller displays but also much smaller batteries, so it should be a wash.
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    It is not a light based auto-brightness, or I could have done that. It's Content Adaptive.
  • extide - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    The brightness stayed at 200 nits for the whole test, which is where they test at, so whats the big issue?
  • maecenas - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    I wonder if it would be feasible to have a retractable webcam at the top of the laptop that could retract when not in use. That would allow for the smaller bezel and would be good from a privacy perspective too.
  • Uplink10 - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    Can someone please tell me in which market this 13" laptops belong. Screen is too small for any serious work or watching movies, it is only usable for administration tasks and portable server because of its size and thickness.
    Would love to see a review of Bay Trail laptops in range to 300 USD, they are cheap and offer a lot for their price.
  • Gunbuster - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    Um professionals that sometimes travel. Those who do "serious work" have an external monitor at their primary work space. I mean you can get a decent 24" LCD for $150 these days...
  • ZeDestructor - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    It's perfect for lightweight tasks when travelling: SSH, web-browsing, IM, a bit of code, reading stuff. If I need actual power, I'll drag along something like a Precision around instead.
  • John_dune - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    As a computer professional who doesn't have a desk at his job, but travels between 8 different worksites, something like this would be amazing to take with me, as in 80% of my computer time at work is dedicated to research, emails, and general day to day trudgery. I've been using 13 inch laptops for almost 7 years now, and have had no major issues with it (the only issue I have is if I ever try to do photo-editing, and at that point a 720p panel just doesn't have the pixels to display everything), even at 720p resolution.
  • Zan Lynx - Saturday, February 21, 2015 - link

    I have a XPS 13 from 2013 and I love it. I use a 28" external at work, but when I'm sitting on the couch or traveling the smaller size machine works great.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now