GPU Performance

In the graphics department we're matching up Qualcomm's Adreno 420 versus the Mali T760MP6. The Adreno is running at 600MHz and is able to benefit from almost double the memory bandwidth at 25.6GB/s versus 13.2GB/s due to the Snapdragon's increased 128-bit memory interface. Let's look at how both compare in our overall benchmarks:

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

In 3DMark Unlimited the Exynos version comes just short of a few fps behind the Adreno 420. What is also surprising is that the Exynos 5433 performs much better in the physics score than I had anticipated; the same test on Huawei's SoCs limited the thread onto the little cores in the default settings giving mediocre performance results. However, it seems the A53 is performing much better and is able to match Qualcomm's offering now.

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

In BaseMark X 1.1, the Exynos is again neck-and-neck with the Snapdragon version. It loses by a slight margin in the Dunes benchmark while winning in the Hangar scenes by a similarly small margin. BaseMark X is again one of the benchmarks that can trigger the 700MHz state of the Mali GPU, offering higher performance at a much higher power draw depending on which scene is currently rendered on both tests.

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

Again we continue to see the same pattern in GFXBench's scenario benchmarks, with the Exynos version lagging a few frames behind the Qualcomm GPU in both Manhattan and T-Rex, in both on-screen and off-screen results.

GFXBench 3.0 ALU Test (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 ALU Test (Offscreen)

It's on the synthetic tests that we finally see some major deviation between the two architectures. ARM's Mali simply can't seem to keep up with the ALU throughput of Qualcomm's architecture. Both the Adreno 330 and 420 have a clear computational power advantage, exceeding even Imagination's PowerVR GPUs in the iPhones, leaving Mali strictly on the lower end of the performance spectrum.

GFXBench 3.0 Alpha Blending Test (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Alpha Blending Test (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Fill Rate Test (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Fill Rate Test (Offscreen)

We see a similar situation in the Alpha Blending and Fillrate tests, as the Adreno offers 2-3x the throughput. Utilizing the extra memory bandwidth here seems to be key to the success of the Snapdragon 805's graphics performance.

GFXBench 3.0 Driver Overhead Test (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Driver Overhead Test (Offscreen)

I've already mentioned the Driver Overhead score in the the more in-depth analysis of the T760. It's the first Android device to truly stand out from the rest of the crowd, finally making some progress into trying to catch up with Apple's excellent performance on iOS. Here's hoping more vendors concentrate on improving this metric in future driver updates.

I did some extensive power measurements on the Note 4 Exynos in this review, so naturally we're keen to see how this transforms into our battery benchmarks on the next page.

CPU and System Performance Battery Life & Charge Time
Comments Locked

135 Comments

View All Comments

  • mpokwsths - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    This one is the correct: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/...
  • Tom Womack - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    This is a superb piece of work: Anandtech at its best.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    Interesting about the power consumption of A7 vs a15, and a53 vs a57.

    I'm curious, what would the performance/Watt be like at the same power draw if you clocked the a53 sky high? Overclock it to 3ghz and see what happens
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    My unit won't go over 1.5GHz unless I vastly increase the voltages, and I don't feel comfortable doing that.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the response
  • patrickjchase - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    You can't - A53 has too many gate delays per pipe stage.

    If you want to go 3 GHz then you have to spread the total work required to execute an instruction over more stages (less work per stage ~= fewer gate delays per stage). That's one reason why the A57 has a 16-stage pipe (minimum for a simple integer op) whereas the A53 has an 8-stage pipe.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Wednesday, March 4, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the response dude, interesting stuff
  • techcrazy - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    Excellent article as always. It looks like you guys are going to review the Galaxy alpha, looking forward to that review. Have you guys manage to get A Sony Xperia Z3 Compact? It will be very interesting to see how it compare against Alpha.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    I'm not sure we'll be actually reviewing the Alpha due to the device being discontinued. I still have the MX4 Pro in the pipeline and after that things will get busy due to MWC.
  • tdslam720 - Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - link

    Great article but I can't help but feel like this is 4 months old. Wouldn't it have been more relevant and better from a clicks point of view to apply most of this research and work to the 7240 and just release this in March?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now