While we’ve also written about the iPhone 6, the iPhone 6 Plus needs its own review in order to really understand the various features of the device that would otherwise be buried in the context of the iPhone 6. Without question, this device represents a significant departure from the way Apple has competed in the smartphone space. Until now, Apple hasn't competed in the phablet space and has thus avoided competing with Galaxy Note line that has been established as the dominant phablet for the past 3-4 generations. As a result, Apple occupies a fast-follower position at best.

This brings us to the iPhone 6 Plus, which really is an extension of the iPhone 6. Both phones share the same SoC, NAND configurations, front and rear camera sensors, LED flash module, industrial/material design, TouchID home button, earpiece and speaker configuration, WiFi/BT chipset, modem, and button layout. At this point, I’m going to stop listing similarities because the iPhone 6 Plus is interesting for its differences. Unlike similarities, the differences are simple. The iPhone 6 Plus is bigger, the display has higher pixel density, the camera has optical image stabilization, and iOS 8 has new app designs to take advantage of the larger screen. The iPhone 6 Plus is also more expensive, with the 16GB version starting at the same price as the 64GB version of the iPhone 6.

While I’ve already discussed the design of the iPhone 6, it’s important to see whether the same design translates to the iPhone 6 Plus. To this end, the iPhone 6 Plus does well. While the angular design of the iPhone 5 line would have looked and felt enormous in the hand, the shape is quite similar to the iPad line and is similarly comfortable in the hand, although the rounded edge really differentiates it, as does the control scheme. The only real issue here is that the top bezel on the front becomes surprisingly large, and this seems to contribute to a sense that the phone is top-heavy even though the phone is evenly balanced.

  Apple iPhone 5s Apple iPhone 6 Apple iPhone 6 Plus
SoC Apple A7 Apple A8 Apple A8
Display 4-inch 1136 x 640 LCD 4.7-inch 1334 x 750 LCD 5.5-inch 1920 x 1080 LCD
WiFi 2.4/5GHz 802.11a/b/g/n, BT 4.0 2.4/5GHz 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, single stream, BT 4.0, NFC
Storage 16GB/32GB/64GB 16GB/64GB/128GB 16GB/64GB/128GB
I/O Lightning connector, 3.5mm headset
Size / Mass 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm,
112 grams
138.1 x 67 x 6.9 mm,
129 grams
158.1 x 77.8 x 7.1 mm,
172 grams
Camera 8MP iSight with 1.5µm pixels Rear Facing + True Tone Flash
1.2MP f/2.4 Front Facing
8MP iSight with 1.5µm pixels Rear Facing + True Tone Flash
1.2MP f/2.2 Front Facing
8MP iSight with 1.5µm pixels Rear Facing + True Tone Flash + OIS
1.2MP f/2.2 Front Facing
Price $99 (16GB),
$149 (32GB)
on 2 year contract
$199 (16GB),
$299 (64GB),
$399 (128GB)
on 2 year contract
$299 (16GB),
$399 (64GB),
$499 (128GB)
on 2 year contract

Overall, even though the iPhone 6 Plus is noticeably taller than the Galaxy Note 3 both feel similar in size. The iPhone 6 Plus is on the thinner side which makes a significant impression in the hand. At any rate, it’s physically impossible for me to use this device with one hand for most situations. It’s definitely a tablet in this sense, but in a much more compact and pocketable form factor.


Of course, drawing the comparison between the iPhone 6 Plus and Galaxy Note 3 inevitably raises the question of “bendgate”, which draws interesting parallels with “scuffgate” from the iPhone 5 generation. Unfortunately, I can’t destroy multiple review units in order to thoroughly investigate this issue. However, we can look at Consumer Reports’ data and come to a few conclusions about this problem. The first is that in the case of the iPhone 6 Plus, there appears to be an area near the bottom of the volume buttons that is a weak point as we see a clear failure of the casing in this area.

However, it seems that there is a significant amount of force needed in the first place in order to cause permanent deformation. Otherwise, everything that we’ve seen is primarily the result of fundamental differences between the two materials. It’s clear that in the case of the Galaxy Note 3 that a great deal of the structural rigidity is tied to the display itself, so the case doesn’t quite provide much in the way of protection as the polymer used is clearly in the elastic region all the way to failure. LG seems to have a different design though, as their polymer material has a clear case of brittle failure at the limit, which saved the display from shattering.

It's certainly possible to bend the iPhone 6 Plus (or really any phone or tablet), but the real issue here that hasn’t been addressed is the level of force needed to cause a certain level of elastic or plastic deformation in the material. This matters far more when discussing drop protection as the level of force in such a scenario is relatively small but applied over an extremely short period of time. There’s also no mention of force per unit area in any of these figures, so we can’t really have a serious discussion about this issue without the necessary data.

Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • jameskatt - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    The vast majority of Chinese will want the iPhone 6 Plus - in gold. Samsung is dead to the Chinese.
    To any wealthy and upper middle class Chinese, the iPhone is the only worthy phone to get. Xiaomi, Lenovo, and other Chinese tigers make up the bottom half. And Samsung is nowhere to be seen. The larger iPhone 6 Plus completely eliminates the need for a Samsung phone.
  • jameskatt - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    If you can't afford an Apple iPhone, simply buy the much cheaper Chinese alternatives.
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    And enjoy fragmentation ,malware, bugginess, terrible software and hardware and on and on. Also Google spying on everything you do a and selling it.
  • thesavvymage - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    yeah, no. Google services dont work in China
  • Narg - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    The Chinese apps stores are much worse for malicious apps....
  • Narg - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    No, if you can't afford Apple, go with a cheap Nokia. 10 times better experience and much better overall in terms of what you get for your money.
  • vFunct - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Why would anyone get a fake iPhone when you can get a real iPhone instead?

    Androids are just lower quality iPhones. They don't innovate like Apple does and Android vendors just try to copy and cheapen, but they can't get the quality right. That is why their products are horrible to use compared to iPhones.

    Again, if you're gonna get a smartphone, get a real iPhone instead of a fake one with Android in it.
  • JeffFlanagan - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Better non-apple products are fake iphones in your extremely limited mind? Can anyone be as clueless and delusional as you pretend to be?
  • vFunct - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Well, the article does say that this is the best on the market, so there goes your argument there.

    You would do well to remove your Android bias.

    Remember, Apple invented the modern smartphone. Everything else is just a lower-quality imitator, with Android devices always trying to play catch-up on Apple's innovation.

    Again, if you want an iPhone, just get a real iPhone.. you don't need to get a fake iPhone like any of those Android devices.
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    It certainly bends better than anything else in the market :3

    What else does it do better?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now