Display

While the iPhone 6 Plus’ display is largely similar to the iPhone 6’s display, there are still a few areas worth talking about. The first area is resolution, which is noticeably better on the iPhone 6 Plus on close examination. In general, there’s less aliasing that is visible on the display. While text rendering in general is even better, the improved resolution is most obvious in the rotation lock symbol, which is noticeably smoother and rounder. The use of the 2208x1242 resolution with downscaling should also have a similar effect to FSAA (Full Screen Anti-Aliasing), which will reduce the effects of aliasing on the display.

Outside of simple resolution testing, we also need to test all other aspects of the display. In order to do this, we turn to SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 with a custom workflow. As always, we use a spectrophotometer to measure color to ensure accurate results. For this review, I won’t go over viewing angles as that’s covered in the iPhone 6 review.

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

Our first test is of peak luminance and contrast. At maximum, the contrast difference between the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus is relatively small, and the difference in peak luminance is relatively small as well. I suspect that this means that Apple isn’t quite at the point where backlight luminous efficiency is rapidly falling off the way it seems to at 500+ PPI RGB LCD displays.

Display - White Point

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Display - Saturation Accuracy

Display - GMB Accuracy

While I normally walk through each type of calibration test, there’s relatively little need in this case as the iPhone 6 Plus is close to the iPhone 6. There are some differences and the iPhone 6 is nearly perfect while the 6 Plus ends up being better than the 5s but not quite at the same level as the 6. I suspect this could be due to production variance, but these are different panels so without additional test units we can't say for certain. The iPhone 6 Plus display is quite close to the iPhone 6’s display in most regards, only larger; this is effectively as good as it gets for an LCD display.

Camera

Ultimately the change to the camera is the one difference that really sets the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus apart outside of the change in size. This one difference is optical image stabilization, or OIS. However, at first it's almost impossible to tell whether OIS is active. As someone who has used multiple cameras with OIS, this is a very odd sensation. Normally, OIS means that it's possible to see the effect of reverse accommodation in either the camera preview or while recording video, but I never saw these effects while recording video, whether in daytime or at night. In fact, I'm not even sure that video is ever optically stabilized, as seen in the videos below. I'm not sure why Apple chose to do this, as video recording is already cropped and would hide most of the odd effects that occur at the edges of the field of view when using OIS.


Putting aside OIS in video, it's obvious that the one area where OIS would be put to use is low light photography. Examining the EXIF data of low light photos, I was rather surprised to discover that in single shot mode (burst mode caps shutter speed to 1/15s) that the iPhone 6 Plus never exceeds 500 ISO. However, in order to keep pace with the iPhone 6's maximum of 2000 ISO and 1/15s exposure time, the iPhone 6 Plus drives exposure time as far as a quarter of a second, which is four times as long.

I really can't emphasize how incredible it is that Apple has pulled this off as it felt like something was wrong when I was testing low light photos as seen below. Normally, such a long exposure time entails noticeable trade-offs, but as far as I can tell motion blur is close to what I see on the iPhone 6 in low light. This seems to be the product of the multiple exposure combination that was mentioned in the keynote, and it really does work as advertised. While some benefit can be seen in the lightbox shot above, it's really in low light conditions like the photo below where we see significant benefits.


As you might expect, there's not much difference in daytime photos. I'm guessing that OIS is disabled above a certain shutter speed in order to reduce the distortion and blurriness that can come from OIS.


Battery Life and Charge Time Software and Final Words
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    iOS has built in support for a stylus.
  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    iOS has built-in support for numerous stylus. Feel free to pick one up if you feel the need. WACOM provides a very nice 2048 one and there are plenty of apps available that make use of the multiple levels of sensitivity.
  • Narg - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    I would liked to have seen photo comparisons with Nokia's phones in this....
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    WHY, WHY anandtech keeps using chrome browser for any browser based benchmark, and using safari browser for apple device? It's just not fair. Sammy's browser has almost TWICE better sunspider score compared to chrome, almost the same as Safari!
  • Parhel - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Not true at all. Not even close to true. Not even a little tiny bit.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Check other reviews who tested both browsers. Stock browser get ~400ms for sunspider test, which is almost 2X better results than chrome.
  • port1974 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    LOL...get a clue!

    When Ford builds a V8 engine do you really think it holds up to ones built by the likes of Porche or Ferrari??? Do you think your 40,000 car can compete with one that costs 400,000.

    Like so many others, your are obviously upset at the fact that you can't afford, or refuse to pay more for these handsets. You are also swayed by raw numbers as opposed to real life performance.

    Apple doesn't need a low end 13 megapixel camera to take great shots when it can accomplish the same result with a properly built 8 Megapixel sensor, that's been optimized fully.

    The operating system is so tightly programmed that it doesn't require 4 cores and 3 GB of ram to outperform the competition.

    Android is a Mal & Spyware riden operating system with over 1 million corrupt apps and counting. It's the Windows of mobile computing. Sloppily written and full of security compromises.

    When Apple updates its software everyone who owns any previous models is immediately included, unlike Android users that have to wait years, if they get them at all. Let me guess...you're still on Jellybean "1 point who cares" !

    Comparing a quality built product to one built out of mediocre scraps is beyond ridiculous and only goes to prove you refuse to grasp reality.

    Let's not even get started on the smartwatch debate...that's a definite dead end for you, given the crap other companies have put forth so far.

    I'm not trying to put you down, as you appear to be trying to do to others, with your less than well thought out rant...just hoping at some point you get the chance to remove the blinders.

    Best of luck with that!
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    Hyundai genesis v8 is actually faster than Porsche panamera baseline model.
  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Maybe 0-60, but that's just spec wars. That Gv8 will never keep up with the Panamera around a course or through some mountain roads.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Based on Nürburgring lap time results, Gv6 is ~10 sec slower than low-end porsches (8:30 vs 8:40), so I bet the v8 version can easily keep up with 310HP baseline panamera at tracks. Maybe I am wrong.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now