Gaming Benchmarks

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013 SLI, Average FPS


In all combinations, the 8370E and the 8150 duke it out. F1 2013 seems to be an Intel dominated title, given the i3 and outperform the FX-9590.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite SLI, Average FPS


The FX-8350 again fits in just beneath the FX-8150, but for a lower power consumption.

Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider SLI, Average FPS


Tomb Raider continues to be CPU agnostic, even around the FX quad thread CPUs.

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs SLI, Average FPS


The eight threads offers some advantage in minimum frame rates, but average frame rates are still around the FX-8150.

Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4 SLI, Average FPS


The FX-8370E stretches its legs a little in terms of minimum frame rates, particularly in SLI, however it is handily beaten by the i3-4330.

CPU Benchmarks AMD FX-8370E Conclusion
Comments Locked

107 Comments

View All Comments

  • mrdude - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    No, no they haven't. Keller has stated that a new 'high performance architecture' is in the works, and that it will be an x86 variant but nothing outside of that. Bear in mind that AMD still considers Vishera a 'high performance architecture', so that statement has no meaning.
  • Germanicus - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    There is no question your bashing and trolling.
  • mrdude - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Yep. Me with my 5870 and 955 Deneb that I bought several years ago, still waiting, bashing and trolling for an upgrade.

    Here's the link to Jim Keller's interview:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOTFE7sJY-Q
  • Germanicus - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Watched it already.
  • TiGr1982 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Stop hoping for AMD and buy/build a modern Intel desktop i5/i7 config, e.g. as I did last year.
    It will be around twice as fast as Deneb - I owned Deneb 940 (used at 3.4 GHz) in the past, so I'm comparing from my own experience.
  • mrdude - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    I have both a Sandy Bridge and a Haswell laptop as my daily drivers. The desktop just sort of sits there soaking up files :P I've long since gotten over my AMD love affair. It's been a long time since the T-bred and Barton days.
  • duploxxx - Wednesday, September 3, 2014 - link

    twice as fast, yeah right go figure.... So now you just read this article twice as fast???

    the issue with review sites is theoretical benchmarks, daily use you don't even notice the difference, HD choice and stupid slow Microsoft OS make the difference in daily tasks. In specific multitasking, sure but then again these AMD parts do actually work well and most of these tasks are done in the background anyhow while doing other stuff, so who cares it would take 1min longer.

    So what is the issue? its review benchmark charts and e-penis behaviour.

    Now people start complaining that Intel is deliberatly reducing renew cycles while its consumers own fault choosing the famous jingle and brand. No reason to buy a atom - celeron - pentium or i3 while APU series offer better overall added value.
  • bsim500 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    So the "95w" 8-core chip actually runs at 3.3GHz and gets thrashed in 100% of tested games by even a 2-core 54w i3-4360?...

    ...And the faster "125w" 4GHz version pulls an eye-watering (and consistent across multiple tests) +233w under load?

    2009 just called and want their CPU's back...
  • Germanicus - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    See my comment above.
  • bsim500 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    I read your comments above. All you did was declare everyone who didn't fawn over the new chips to be a "troll", dodged a question someone asked then suggested that everyone who buys an Intel chip should "feel dirty" (which is trolling)...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now